Guidance on Attainment Tests for O3 / PM / Regional Haze

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft STI DWB By Hilary H. Main Paul T. Roberts Sonoma Technology, Inc Redwood Way, Suite C Petaluma, CA Prepared for the U.S.
Advertisements

1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Eladio M. Knipping, Ph.D. January 16, 2014 Air Quality Applied Science Team (AQAST) Meeting Rice University, Houston, TX Air Quality Research from the.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
1 Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan Bush Clinton Bush.
PM Model Performance Goals and Criteria James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling Meeting Denver, CO May 26,
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group.
St. Louis PM 2.5 SIP Modeling Update Calvin Ku, Ph.D. Missouri Department of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Advisory Committee.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Projection of Visibility Changes and Modeling Sensitivity Analysis.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Analysis.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation WESTAR Conference on BART Guidelines and Trading September 1, 2005 Tom Moore -
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
1 MANE-VU Modeling Plans Inter-RPO Modeling Meeting May 25, 2004 Shan He, Emily Savelli, Jung-Hun Woo, John Graham and Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Impacts of Meteorological Variations on RRFs (Relative Response Factors) in the Demonstration of Attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality for 8-hr.
Source: Javier Fochesatto Regulatory Context for Modeling Robert Elleman EPA Region 10.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
National RPO Technical Meeting June 9, 2005 Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
VISTAS 2002 MPE and NAAQS SIP Modeling
Weight of Evidence for Regional Haze Reasonable Progress
EPA Air Policy Priorities
Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations that Result from Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) James T. Kelly, Adam Reff, and Brett Gantt.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Brian Timin- EPA/OAQPS
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Byeong-Uk Kim and Jim Boylan Planning and Support Program
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Impact of NOx Emissions in Georgia on Annual PM2.5
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Regional Modeling Update
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Oil and Gas Emission Inventories and Applications for Estimating Impacts to Health and Welfare Tom Moore, WESTAR-WRAP John Grant and Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ramboll.
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Status of Exceptional Events
Implementation Workgroup April 19, 2007
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Guidance on Attainment Tests for O3 / PM / Regional Haze Ellen Baldridge & Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group / EPA 2nd Models-3 Workshop Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 October 21, 2002

Status of Modeling Guidance Guidance for Estimating Attainment of 8-hour Ozone NAAQS (Draft) Guidance for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for PM2.5 and Regional Haze (Draft) http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram Modeling Guidance -- DRAFT8HR Modeling Guidance -- DRAFT-PM

Status of Modeling Guidance (continued) Drafts extensively reviewed by Regional Offices State representatives Stakeholder groups Ellen Baldridge – O3 Brian Timin – PM2.5 & regional haze

What is in the Modeling Guidance? How to use modeling and other analyses – modeled attainment demonstration through relative reduction factors – screening test – weight of evidence How to setup and apply models

Modeled Attainment Demonstration – Relative Reduction Factors – Use models to predict relative changes in concentrations – determine site specific observed design values – model current pollutant concentrations – model future pollutant concentrations – calculate RRFs as ratios of future to current – estimate future concentrations as a product of observed design values and RRFs For PM2.5, sum across components (RRF each for SO4, NO3, OC, EC, IP, CM)

Screening Test Concentrations are predicted where there are no nearby monitors Predicted concentrations are greater than those in vicinity of monitors Maximum areawide design value is multiplied by RRFs for non-monitor locations to estimate design value

Weight of Evidence Supplement to attainment test Core plus additional analyses Other air quality estimates (e.g., grid-cell hours >NAAQS) Analysis of air quality & emission trends Receptor oriented models Results of all analyses are reviewed and weighed

Modeling Systems for Ozone Urban Airshed Models (UAM, MAQSIP, CALGRID, etc.) CAMx (source apportionment capability) Models3/CMAQ Model performance/accuracy is well established

Modeling Systems for PM2.5 Models3/CMAQ – proof-of-concept applications as basis for support and guidance REMSAD – policy analysis applications & national rules Other regional models – PM-CAMx, URM, UAM-AERO, SAQM

Other PM Modeling Approaches Source Apportionment – PM-CAMx & CMAQ “Hot spot” analyses – ISC, AERMOD, CALPUFF Receptor models – CMB, UNMIX, PMF

Upcoming Modeling Activities Continue model performance evaluation Explore sulfate, nitrate, and organic issues SMOKE w/ BEIS3, Mobile-6, improved NH3, fires, primary PM emissions Vertical layer sensitivity modeling Nitrate oriented sensitivities