Shall we modify BLM Thresholds on Superconducting Magnets?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Advertisements

CSC Simulated Charge Tim Cox, Jay Hauser, Greg Rakness, Rick Wilkinson CSC Charge Simulation1.
LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th UFOs in the LHC Tobias Baer LBOC June, 14 th 2011 Acknowledgements: N. Garrel, B. Goddard, E.B. Holzer, S.
LHC UFO Study Working GroupSeptember 15 th UFOs since TS#4 LHC UFO Study Group Tobias Baer September, 15 th 2011 Acknowledgements: B. Goddard, S.
BLM thresholds for MQW magnets V. Raginel, B. Auchmann, D. Wollmann BLM Threshold Working Group meeting, 24/02/2015.
E.B. Holzer Chamonix XIV workshop, CERN January 18, Pre-commissioning of Critical Beam Instrumentation Systems E.B. Holzer, O.R. Jones CERN AB/BDI.
Andrzej SIEMKO, CERN/AT-MTM Slide 1 14th “Chamonix Workshop”, January 2005 Beam loss induced quench levels A. Siemko and M. Calvi Machine Protection Issues.
Mariusz Sapinski BI/BL Acknowledgements: 1 Planning of quench tests - QTSWG Latest news concerning planning of quench tests Quench Test Strategy.
LSWG day, Sept. 2, 2014, B. Auchmann for the BLMTWG Collaboration of many teams: OP, RF, BI, Collimation, LIBD, FLUKA, etc. T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi,
BIQ Workshop, September 15 Collaboration of many teams: BLM, Collimation, FLUKA, LIBD, OP, RF, etc. B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets, B.Dehning 1 B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco,
LMC 30 LPC A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run Heat pulse.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Status of FLUKA Simulations for Collimation BLM Thresholds 6 th BLM Threshold Working Group 10/02/2015 E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Sixtrack input.
6 th QTAWG meeting, March 28, Overview 6 tests/events have been analyzed. RegimeMethodCERN namingMagnet typeTemperature shortkick750 µrad kick eventMB1.9.
B. Auchmann, O. Picha, Joint CWG/BLMTWG Meeting August
Bus-Bar Quench Studies Summary of Available Calculations LMC Meeting August 5 th 2009 Bus-Bar Quench Studies Summary of Available Calculations LMC Meeting.
Mariusz Sapinski BI/BL Acknowledgements: 1 Planning of quench tests - LMC158 Draft planning of beam induced quench tests at the end of 2013 run LHC Machine.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
1 Heat load for a beam loss on the superconducting magnet Yosuke Iwamoto, Toru Ogitsu, Nobuhiro Kimura, Hirokatsu Ohhata, Tatsushi Nakamoto and Akira Yamamoto.
Mariusz Sapinski (LOAO) FAIR Commissioning and Control WG GSI, November 18 th, 2015 Experience with LHC Beam Loss Monitoring system (and lessons for FAIR)
LHC Beam Loss Monitors, B.Dehning 1/15 LHC Beam loss Monitors Loss monitor specifications Radiation tolerant Electronics Ionisation chamber development.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
Eva Barbara Holzer July 16, LHC MPP Eva Barbara Holzer for the BLM team LHC MPP CERN, July 17, 2010 Proposal on Threshold Corrections for RC Filters.
Chamonix 2006, B.Dehning 1 Commissioning of Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning CERN AB/BDI.
Beam Induced Quench Session 2: quench test at LHC B. Dehning, C. Bracco.
Draft MD Planning Thu (3.11.) DayTimeMDMP Thu05:00 Ramp down, cycle 07: GeV: Injection stability and losses – check steering constraints, define.
Simulations and BLM Scaling Studies for the Collimation Quench Test (with protons) A. Mereghetti CWG Meeting, CERN, 22 nd Oct 2015.
Pier Paolo Granieri, TE-CRG Collimation Upgrade Specification Meeting #35 21 st March, 2014.
Energy deposition with and without IR3 upgrade Predicted energy deposition with and without IR3 (IR7)dispersion suppressor collimators. Gain from collimators.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
1 st BLMTWG Meeting, , B. Auchmann, O. Picha with help from M. Sapinski, E.B. Holzer, A. Priebe.
Eva Barbara Holzer LHC Machine Protection ReviewSeptember 6, Eva Barbara Holzer LHC Machine Protection ReviewSeptember 6, Eva Barbara Holzer.
HCAL Leakage Studies CLIC Physics & Detector Meeting 10. November 2008 Christian Grefe CERN.
Results from the cold test of the first QD0 prototype
Overview of LHC Beam Loss Measurements
Workshop on Beam Induced Quenches, Sept. 15, 2014
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Quench Simulation at GSI
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Second look at the results of the 2012 analysis of triplet thresholds
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Injection region BLMs – ECR
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, B.Dehning
Interpretation and use of BLM Data
Assessment of BLM thresholds at cold magnets
Agenda 9:00-10:00 Beam Interlock System Changes Following the 2006 Audit Benjamin Todd 10:00-11:00 Beam Dump System follow-up from the 2008 Audit Jan Uythoven.
Sensitivity tests of BLM_S chamber in PSB dump
Using the code QP3 to calculate quench thresholds for the MB
Commissioning of BLM system
Beam Loss Monitoring Eva Barbara Holzer, CERN
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Wednesday 09 March …:09:00: beta* measurement (1.5 m) by K-modulation and with AC-dipole excitation. 1/17/2019 LHC 8:30 meeting.
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
The n-3He Simulation Using Geant4
Warm Magnet Thresholds
Report on Beam Loss Monitors
Machine Protection Issues affecting Beam Commissioning
Thursday 17/3 Morning: evaluation of the origin of the timing problem occurred over night and the implication on machine protection 09:00 – 12:00 Dry ramp.
Wednesday h10: Programmed dump. 07h54: Injection. 200b.
The combined signal spectra of PSD for protons and helium nuclei
Presentation transcript:

Shall we modify BLM Thresholds on Superconducting Magnets? Mariusz Sapinski CERN 2010.09.03 Shall we modify BLM Thresholds on Superconducting Magnets?

Threshold components and Note44 algorithm T = SBLM(Eb) · ΔQ (Eb,t) / ED (Eb,t) BLM signal quench margin energy deposited in coil 1. t<tmetal : ΔQ = enthalpy limit (ΔH), ED=Emax 2. tmetal<t<thelium : ΔQ = ΔH+5%Helium, ED=Ecable 3. t>thelium : ΔQ = 5%Helium+SteadyFlow·t, ED=Ecable Helium = ⌡T0Tquench cV dT, T0=1.9K or 4.5K, Tquench=2.8K … 9K Ingredients, 8 functions of Ebeam: SBLM,tmetal,thelium,ΔH,SteadyFlow, Emax,Ecable,Helium Geant4, analytic calculations, thermodynamic models measured!

Threshold components tmetal=4.6 ms filter correction 3.5 TeV dry cable He heat flow

Threshold components and new algorithm T = SBLM(Eb) · ΔQ (Eb,t) / ED (Eb) BLM signal quench margin energy deposited in coil 1. t<tmetal : ΔQ = enthalpy limit (ΔH), ED = Emax 2. tmetal<t<thelium : ΔQ = ΔH+5%Helium, ED=Ecable 3. t>thelium : ΔQ = 5%Helium+SteadyFlow·t, ED=Ecable Helium = ⌡T0Tquench cV dT, T0=1.9K or 4.5K, Tquench=2.8K … 9K Ingredients, 3 functions of Ebeam: SBLM, ED – radial distribution, ΔQ (t) – with all physical processes measured!

Quench margins - comparison Note44 – algorithm ZERODEE (P-P. Granieri, 2008) Arjan's code Quench test result about 20 mJ/cc Interestingly, for 7 TeV the millisecond scale QL behaves similarly – Note44 concentrated on 7 TeV operation. RS05, factor 4

Threshold comparison 450 GeV old 450 GeV new 3.5 TeV old 3.5 TeV new

My remarks Experience indicates that for losses in millisecond timescale we are more than factor 3 from quench level. This hopefully will be verified by quench test and wire scanner scan with 50 bunches – next week. Arjan's code and ZERODEE indicate that we underestimate BLM thresholds in millisecond scale. Arjan's code offers more sophisticated approach to Quench Levels than Note 44, and is especially powerful in the intermediate time range, where obviously Note 44 algorithms are artificial. Arjan's code is “private” - up to now all we have been using was published. We need more understanding of the code results, quench experiments and probably more simulations (Edep distributions in the coils) but, in view of the recent dumps in RS05, we might gain by producing more reliable BLM thresholds in millisecond scale.

Extra slides

Threshold components tmetal=4.6 ms sanity check He heat reserve thelium He heat flow 3.5 TeV tmetal dry cable filter correction