Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Advertisements

Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Distinct Roles for CTD Ser-2 and Ser-5 Phosphorylation in the Recruitment and Allosteric Activation of Mammalian mRNA Capping Enzyme  C.Kiong Ho, Stewart.
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Cdc7-Dbf4 Phosphorylates MCM Proteins via a Docking Site-Mediated Mechanism to Promote S Phase Progression  Yi-Jun Sheu, Bruce Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast  Song Chou, Lan Huang, Haoping Liu  Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Seung-Jae Lee, Craig Montell  Neuron 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Repression by Ume6 Involves Recruitment of a Complex Containing Sin3 Corepressor and Rpd3 Histone Deacetylase to Target Promoters  David Kadosh, Kevin.
Mediator–Nucleosome Interaction
Sun Young Kim, James E. Ferrell  Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Sharona E Gordon, Michael D Varnum, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Junbiao Dai, Weiwu Xie, Troy L. Brady, Jiquan Gao, Daniel F. Voytas 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Xuetong Shen, Ryan Ranallo, Eugene Choi, Carl Wu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Heterochromatin Dynamics in Mouse Cells
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Alain Verreault, Paul D. Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman 
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 935-942 (October 2002) Essential Role for the SANT Domain in the Functioning of Multiple Chromatin Remodeling Enzymes  Laurie A. Boyer, Michael R. Langer, Kimberly A. Crowley, Song Tan, John M. Denu, Craig L. Peterson  Molecular Cell  Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 935-942 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00634-2

Figure 1 SANT Domains Play Key Roles for Chromatin Remodeling Enzymes In Vivo The amino acid sequences of the SANT domains are shown at the top of each panel. Deletions are indicated by black bars beneath the sequence. All other residues targeted for mutagenesis are identified by asterisks. (A) The Swi3p SANT domain is required for SWI/SNF function in vivo. Strains were grown to mid log phase in YEPD and analyzed for β-galactosidase expression from an integrated HO-lacZ reporter (Stern et al., 1984). Analyses were performed in triplicate and values were averaged. Values varied by <15%. Activity was normalized to percentages of wild-type levels. Strains used were CY666 (wild-type), CY667 (swi3-), CY669 (ΔSANT), CY671 (W546A), CY674 (C561A), CY675 (R564A), CY676 (F565A), CY694 (R565E), CY695 (Q560A), and CY697 (W546A, F565A). (B) The SANT domain is essential for RSC function. Strains harbored a deletion in RSC8/SWH3 and contained a wild-type copy of RSC8/SWH3 on a URA3-CEN plasmid (CY885). CY885 was then transformed with a control LEU2-CEN plasmid (RS315) or LEU2-CEN plasmid containing a copy of one of the following: wild-type RSC8/SWH3 (RS315-RSC8), rsc8/swh3 K353A (CP817), or rsc8/swh3 ΔSANT (CP816). Strains were initially grown on YEPD and replica plated onto either selective media or media containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (FOA) and grown for 5 days at 30°C. (C) Ada2p function requires a functional SANT domain. Strains were grown to mid log phase in YEPD and analyzed for β-galactosidase activity from an integrated HO-lacZ reporter. Analyses were performed in triplicate and values were averaged. Values varied by <15%. Activity was normalized to percentages of wild-type levels. Strains used were CY733 (wild-type), CY718 (H103E), CY719 (Δ98-102), and CY884 (Δ97-106). Molecular Cell 2002 10, 935-942DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00634-2)

Figure 2 The SANT Domain Is Required for the Activity of Gcn5p-Containing HAT Complexes (A) Western blotting was used to probe the subunit composition of peak SAGA fractions isolated from wild-type and Ada2Δ97-106 strains. (B) In vitro acetylation assays using nucleosomal substrates. Assays were performed using a 6-fold range in concentration of Gcn5p-containing HAT complexes (0.5, 1.5, 3 μl). Gcn5p-containing HAT complexes were incubated with oligonucleosomes and 3H-acetyl CoA and subjected to 18% SDS-PAGE. Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue to visualize histones, destained, soaked in ENHANCE (NEN), and analyzed by autoradiography. Data shown are representative of at least three independent experiments and multiple HAT purifications. (C) GST binding reactions were performed with SAGA fractions isolated from CY733 (wild-type) and CY884 (Ada2Δ97-106). Equivalent amounts of SAGA were incubated with glutathione agarose beads bound with GST-H3 (amino acids 1-46) or GST as control. Binding reactions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with antisera to Ada3p or Gcn5p. 100% of the bound fraction, 50% of the input, and 50% of the unbound fractions were analyzed. Similar results were seen in at least five independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 935-942DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00634-2)

Figure 3 Ada2p SANT Domain Stimulates Catalytic Activity of Gcn5p (A) Purification of recombinant Gcn5p, Gcn5p/Ada2p, and Gcn5p/Ada2pΔSANT. Shown are Western blots of Ni2+-NTA agarose eluates obtained by fractionation of bacterial lysates. (B) H3 peptide saturation curves for Gcn5p (open circles), Gcn5p/Ada2p (closed squares), and Gcn5p/Ada2pΔSANT (open diamonds). (C) Core histone saturation curves for Gcn5p (open circles), Gcn5p/Ada2p (closed squares), and Gcn5p/Ada2pΔSANT (open diamonds). (D) Plots of initial velocity versus [Nucleosomes] for Gcn5p (open circles) and Gcn5p/Ada2p (closed squares). Reactions were performed using 100 μM AcCoA at 24 ± 1°C, in 5 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5). Initial rates (nM product formed per second per Gcn5p equivalent, Eeq) were determined and analyzed via fits to the Michaelis-Menten equation (displayed curves). The Gcn5p enzyme equivalent, Eeq, was determined from quantitative Western blot titration of the three Gcn5p preparations. Steady state parameters for the various forms of Gcn5p were obtained from duplicate, triplicate, or quadruplicate experiments and are summarized in Table 1. Stock concentrations of histones and nucleosomes were calculated separately after complete acetylation of substrates when excess Gcn5p was employed. This ensured accurate determination of initial substrate concentrations as reported in the x axis of each plot. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 935-942DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00634-2)