Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structural Basis for Recognition of Diubiquitins by NEMO
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
GTP-Dependent K-Ras Dimerization
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Jianchao Li, Haiyang Liu, Manmeet H. Raval, Jun Wan, Christopher M
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 126-138 (January 2015) Structural and Functional Characterization of the Phosphorylation-Dependent Interaction between PML and SUMO1  Laurent Cappadocia, Xavier H. Mascle, Véronique Bourdeau, Samuel Tremblay-Belzile, Malik Chaker-Margot, Mathieu Lussier-Price, Junya Wada, Kazuyasu Sakaguchi, Muriel Aubry, Gerardo Ferbeyre, James G. Omichinski  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 126-138 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Interaction between SUMO1 and PML in HEK293T Cells (A) Schematic representation of PML domains (human PML-I) and sequence alignment of the phosphoSIM regions of PML from different eukaryotic species. The domains and regions indicated as boxes in the schematic representation include the Really Interesting New Gene (RING) domain (light gray), the B1 and B2 B-box domains (medium gray), the coiled-coil domain (dark gray), and the phosphoSIM module (black). In the alignment of the PML phosphoSIM region: †, CK2-concensus sites; ∗, identical residues in the aligned sequences; and ., homologous residues. (B) Amino-acid sequence of phosphoSIM mutants used for BRET studies. The residues mutated are in italics and underlined. (C) Representative BRET titration curves showing interaction between SUMO1 and either wild-type PML or mutants in HEK293T cells. The PML-RLuc (▪), PML-4SD-Rluc (▵), and PML-4SA-Rluc (▿) were used with GFP-SUMO1. See also Figure S1. Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Phosphorylation of PML Enhances Interaction with SUMO1 (A) Representative ITC thermogram for the interaction between SUMO1 and the PML-SIM peptide. (B) Amino-acid sequences of the PML-SIM and the PML-SIM-PO4 peptides used in the ITC studies. (C) Comparison of the dissociation constant (KD) values for SUMO1 binding to the PML-SIM and PML-SIM-PO4 peptides in the ITC studies. Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SUMO1 Lysine Residues Are Critical for PML:SUMO1 Interaction (A) Ribbon model of the 3D structure of SUMO1 (light gray; PDB ID 2UYZ) with lysine residues from the two basic patches highlighted as sticks. (B) Representative BRET titration curves showing interaction between either wild-type SUMO1 or the SUMO1 basic patch mutants and PML in HEK293T cells. PML-RLuc was used with GFP-SUMO1 (▪), GFP-SUMO1-K37-39A (○), GFP-SUMO1-K45-46A (+), or GFP-SUMO1-4KA (∗). Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Positively Charged Residues in SUMO1 Make Specific Interactions with the PML-SIM-PO4 Peptide (A) Overlay from the 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled SUMO1 in the presence of one molar equivalent of either the unlabeled PML-SIM (blue) or PML-SIM-PO4 peptide (pink). (B) Histogram of the differences in chemical shift perturbations (CSP) that occur in the titration between 15N-labeled SUMO1 and the PML-SIM-PO4 peptide with those obtained in the titration between 15N-labeled SUMO1 and the PML-SIM peptide. The differences in chemical shift changes for the two individual titrations were calculated using the formula Δδ = [(0.17ΔNH)2 + (ΔHN)2]1/2. (C) Ribbon model of the 3D structure of SUMO1 (light gray; PDB ID 2UYZ). The amino acids of 15N-labeled SUMO1 showing a significant chemical shift change (Δδ [ppm] > 0.15) upon formation of a complex with PML-SIM-PO4 are highlighted in green. See also Figure S2. Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Crystal Structures of the ΔN-SUMO1:PML-SIM-PO4 and ΔN-SUMO1:PML-SIM Complexes (A) Electron density map corresponding to residues 552–562 of PML-SIM-PO4. The peptide is in stick representation with carbon atoms colored in yellow. The 2FoFc electron density map, contoured at 0.8σ, is represented by a gray mesh. (B) Overall structure of the ΔN-SUMO1:PML-SIM-PO4 complex highlighting the interactions between SUMO1 and residues 552–562 of PML (PDB entry 4WJN). The proteins are in cartoon representation with ΔN-SUMO1 carbon atoms (gray) and PML-SIM-PO4 peptide carbon atoms (yellow); ΔN-SUMO1 residues interacting with the PML-SIM-PO4 peptide are in stick representation. (C) Electron density map corresponding to PML-SIM residues 552–560 and using the same representation mode as in (A) with PML carbon atoms colored in green. (D) Overall structure of the ΔN-SUMO1:PML-SIM complex highlighting the interactions between SUMO1 and PML (PDB entry 4WJO). The presentation is similar to (C) with PML carbon atoms colored in green. See also Figure S3. Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 In Vivo Effect of Expressing PML-IV Wild-Type or PhosphoSIM Mutants in U2OS Cells (A) Growth curves for U2OS cells stably expressing a control (Vect), a PML-IV (PML-wt), a PML-4SA mutant, or a PML-VVVI-AAAS mutant. Data are represented as mean of triplicates monitored over a 9-day growth period, and statistical analysis (t test) for the mutants was performed relative to the PML-wt. ∗ p < 5 × 10−4, ∗∗ p < 5 × 10−5. (B) Immunoblots of PML and tubulin in U2OS cells as in (A). (C) Indirect immunofluorescence with an anti-PML antibody and DAPI, nuclear marker, to visualize PML-NBs in U2OS cells, as in (A). Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Structural Comparison of the ΔN-SUMO1:PML-SIM-PO4 and ΔN-SUMO1:mDaxx-SIM-PO4 Complexes (A) Structure of the ΔN-SUMO1:mDaxx-SIM-PO4 complex highlighting the interactions between SUMO1 and residues 733–740 of Daxx (PDB entry 4WJP). The proteins are in cartoon representation with ΔN-SUMO1 carbon atoms (gray) and mDaxx-SIM-PO4 peptide carbon atoms (cyan); ΔN-SUMO1 residues interacting with mDaxx-SIM-PO4 are in stick representation. (B) Structural comparison of the phosphorylated/acidic region of the phosphoSIMs of PML and Daxx (cyan) in the phosphorylated form. The proteins are in cartoon representation with the ΔN-SUMO1 carbon atoms (gray), the PML-SIM-PO4 peptide carbon atoms (yellow), and the mDaxx-SIM-PO4 peptide carbon atoms (cyan); ΔN-SUMO1 residues interacting with the mDaxx-SIM-PO4 peptide are in stick representation. See also Figure S4. Structure 2015 23, 126-138DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.10.015) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions