Some Power-save changes in e Draft

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission January 2004 Mathilde Benveniste, Avaya Labs -- ResearchSlide 1 Clarifications on APSD Mathilde Benveniste Avaya.
Doc.: IEEE /0846r0 Submission July 2008 Mathilde BenvenisteSlide 1 Power save for wireless mesh Mathilde Benveniste
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0619r1 Submission May 2008 M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) Scheduled service periods in wireless mesh Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /0619r0 Submission May 2008 M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) Scheduled service periods in wireless mesh Notice: This document has been prepared.
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Power Save Delivery for 11ay
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
Solving Status mismatch
Solving Status mismatch
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
Integration of WUR to Power Save Mode
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Further Discussion on “Lost Ack” During Unscheduled Service Period
Further Discussion on “Lost Ack” During Unscheduled Service Period
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
Remedy to the ‘Missing Ack Problem’
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Remaining issues regarding power save
Clarifications on Call Admission Control for EDCA
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
Remedy to the Lost Ack Problem while Power Saving
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Power efficient and unified s solution
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
6 GHz operation for 11ax follow up
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: January 2008
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Piggybacked Inter-Service Time
Resolution to Comment 497, TGe D5.0
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
Direct transmission in PSM
Interference Signalling Enhancements
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
Peer Service Period Date: Authors: January 2008 Month Year
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
Use of More Data Field Date: Authors: Jan 2006 Jan 2006
Admissions Control and Scheduling Behaviours for Scheduled EDCA
Peer Traffic Indication enhancements
Stephen Wang, Floyd Simpson, Steve Emeott, Ye Chen,
Resolution to Comment 497, TGe D5.0
Presentation transcript:

Some Power-save changes in 802.11e Draft May 2004 Some Power-save changes in 802.11e Draft Mathilde Benveniste - Avaya Labs Mark Bilstad - Cisco Systems Steve Emeott, Floyd Simpson, Stephen Wang - Motorola Jarkko Kneckt, Jari Jokela - Nokia Keith Amman, SpectraLink Andrei Kajukhov, TI Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

Comments resolved with this proposal May 2004 Comments resolved with this proposal Amann/7 Amann/11 Amann/5 Barr/4 Barr/5 Barr/8 Barr/9 Eklund/2 Eklund/3 Eklund/4 Eklund/5 Eklund/6 Eklund/7 Eklund/8 Hansen/10 Hansen/12 Kandala/9 Kandala/22 Benveniste/4 Benveniste/5 Benveniste/6 Benveniste/7 Benveniste/8 Benveniste/9 Benveniste/10 Benveniste/11 Benveniste/12 Benveniste/13 Benveniste/14 Benveniste/15 Barr/18 Barr/19 Barr/20 Barr/21 Barr/22 Barr/23 Barr/24 Barr/25 Barr/26 Barr/27 Barr/28 Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

The power-save method was simplified and enhanced as follows: May 2004 SCOPE The power-save method was simplified and enhanced as follows: Stations may continue to use Unscheduled APSD for all-traffic (periodic and non-periodic) At the same time stations have information and control over the amount of buffered traffic received per service period Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

May 2004 Overview of Power Save Unscheduled APSD is made into a generalization of legacy PS-poll releases a single frame No overlapping service periods Scheduled and Unscheduled APSD my co-exist TIM/MD reflects the status of all frames (NO CHANGE) Any uplink QoS data or QoS null frame can act as a trigger for the service period (NO CHANGE) QoS trigger specifies maximum downlink frames will be in the service period The last DL frame transmitted in the service period must have the EOSP set to 1 Downlink frames may contain a queue size and AC of highest priority buffered frame Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

What we had before in the 802.11e draft May 2004 What we had before in the 802.11e draft The TIM and More Data bit indicate whether traffic is buffered at the AP The AP is required to send at least one frame (if one is buffered), but may send more Unscheduled APSD was enabled on a per AC basis TSPECs were used by a station to enable use of U-APSD for each AC/TS Legacy and APSD can be used by the same station Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

May 2004 Use of APSD Unscheduled APSD has become a generalization of legacy power save Scheduled and Unscheduled APSD may co-exist The choice of Scheduled APSD for an AC/TS will be indicated by sending a TSPEC A scheduled SP will end upon receipt of a frame with the EOSP bit set and TID corresponding to the TSPEC; all other TIDs on a frame with the EOSP bit set will end an unscheduled SP Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

No Overlapping Service Periods May 2004 No Overlapping Service Periods Only one service period of a given type (scheduled or unscheduled) can be active at a time per station Any frames received by the AP from a station while an unscheduled service period is already active for the station will not be regarded as triggers Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

May 2004 A Requirement: The EOSP bit must be set in the final DL frame transmitted in a service period Problem: If the frame with the EOSP bit set is transmitted by the AP before other frames released in the same service period, the station will go to sleep before it receives all transmitted frames This problem is addressed by the above requirement A way to meet this requirement: Frames go through the same access/transmit buffer in a service period; e.g. In a service period, frames are released from a single triggered buffer and all have the same AC The AP will chose the buffer for frame release it will release frames from the highest-priority non-empty buffer Thus, there will be no frames arriving after the station has gone back to sleep Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

May 2004 Possible organization of triggered buffers & frame release (Informative) If there are as many triggered buffers as ACs, there is one triggered buffer per AC If the AP employs fewer triggered buffers than ACs, ACs are (dynamically) mapped into buffers monotonically. E.g. All higher priority triggered buffers, except for the lowest, receive frames corresponding to a single AC The lowest-priority triggered buffer receives frames corresponding to the remaining ACs Frames released in a service period are transmitted from the same access/transmit buffer; this ensures that the EOSP frame arrives last. E.g. In a service period, frames are released from a single triggered buffer and have the same AC Example: 3 active ACs 2 triggered buffers AC=3 AC=1 AC=0 Arriving frames by AC 2 triggered buffers per trigger-enabled station Triggered Buffer 2 Triggered Buffer 1 Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

Dealing with possible confusion at the stations May 2004 Dealing with possible confusion at the stations Using a single TIM (and a single More Data bit) gives rise to ambiguity concerning the priority of the buffered frames; this may cause a problem for devices needing to perform other urgent tasks With knowledge of the priority of buffered traffic, a station could retrieve higher-priority frames immediately; lower priority frames could be left to wait Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

Proposal: Add signaling for priority information May 2004 Proposal: Add signaling for priority information An APSD station seeing the TIM indication will decide whether to generate a trigger frame, wait until its next trigger frame, or wait longer before responding to a TIM (or More Data bit) indication To help with this decision, the AP conveys information on the priority of buffered frame; we propose the addition of signaling in a field that is currently transmitted, but reserved. Bits 8-15 in the QoS control field of the DL frame (which correspond to Queue Size in an uplink frame) are used to convey information about data remaining buffered when the DL frame is released. They would show TID of the highest-priority frame buffered in bits 8-11 the queue size – I.e. total buffered traffic (in units of 4096 octets), found in bits 12-15 Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

Proposal: Limit the SP length May 2004 Proposal: Limit the SP length To provide more control to the station on the amount to buffered traffic sent per SP, the station may indicate the maximum number of frames in an SP in a trigger frame When bit 7 is set to 1, the value in Bits 8-10 in the QoS control field of the trigger frame is the Max SP Length A PS-Poll may be used as a trigger frame with maximum SP length of 1 frame Max SP Length (frames) Interpretation Do not start service period 1-6 Maximum number of downlink frames in the SP 7 No limit imposed on the maximum number of frames in the SP Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

Summary of proposed changes May 2004 Summary of proposed changes Unscheduled APSD is made into a generalization of legacy PS-poll releases a single frame Scheduled and Unscheduled APSD my co-exist The choice of Scheduled APSD will be indicated by sending a TSPEC A scheduled SP will end upon receipt of a frame with the EOSP bit set and TID corresponding to the TSPEC; all other TIDs on a frame with the EOSP bit set will end an unscheduled SP No overlapping service periods TIM/MD reflects the status of all frames (NO CHANGE) Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI

Summary of proposed changes - 2 May 2004 Summary of proposed changes - 2 Any uplink QoS data or QoS null frame can act as a trigger for the service period (NO CHANGE) QoS trigger specifies maximum downlink frames will be in the service period 0 => do not start service period 1-6 => corresponding number of downlink frames 7 => no limit on frames released The last frame transmitted in the service period has the EOSP set to 1 AP may limit frames in SP to a single AC; most likely this will be the highest priority AC w/ buffered frames Downlink frames may contain a queue size AP provides queue size for all ACs and indicates the highest-priority AC with frames remaining buffered at the AP Avaya, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia, SpectraLink, TI