A Multicenter Study Comparing Two Numerical Versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in Palliative Care Patients Sharon M. Watanabe, MD, Cheryl Nekolaichuk, PhD, Crystal Beaumont, BSc, Laureen Johnson, RN, Jeff Myers, MD, Florian Strasser, MD Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 456-468 (February 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020 Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Overall, how different were your responses between Form A (ESAS) and Form B (ESAS-r)? (n=160). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Overall, how important is the difference between Form A (ESAS) and Form B (ESAS-r)? (n=158). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Distribution of drowsiness scores (ESAS vs. ESAS-r). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Distribution of appetite scores (ESAS vs. ESAS-r). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Distribution of well-being scores (ESAS vs. ESAS-r). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 41, 456-468DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.020) Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions