Capturing Auxin Response Factors Syntax Using DNA Binding Models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Advertisements

Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Prediction of IgE-binding epitopes by means of allergen surface comparison and correlation to cross-reactivity  Fabio Dall'Antonia, PhD, Anna Gieras,
IPA1: A New “Green Revolution” Gene?
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Harnessing the Potential of the Tea Tree Genome
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
GeneCloud Reveals Semantic Enrichment in Lists of Gene Descriptions
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Genetic and Epigenetic Determinants of Neurogenesis and Myogenesis
BARLEX – the Barley Draft Genome Explorer
Analysis of total and polysomal RNA clk-1(qm30) and clk-1(qm30)+WT.
Kinetic Discrimination of tRNA Identity by the Conserved Motif 2 Loop of a Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase  Ethan C. Guth, Christopher S. Francklyn 
Transcriptome Survey of the Contribution of Alternative Splicing to Proteome Diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana  Haopeng Yu, Caihuan Tian, Yang Yu, Yuling.
Systems Biophysics of Gene Expression
Genomic cis-Regulatory Architecture and trans-Acting Regulators of a Single Interneuron-Specific Gene Battery in C. elegans  Adam S Wenick, Oliver Hobert 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
GeneCloud Reveals Semantic Enrichment in Lists of Gene Descriptions
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
A Drug-Drug Interaction Crystallizes a New Entry Point into the UPR
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Mathematical Modeling of the Heat-Shock Response in HeLa Cells
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Anne Pfeiffer, Hui Shi, James M. Tepperman, Yu Zhang, Peter H. Quail 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages (December 2012)
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Positive and Negative Control of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions by Other DNA Loops Generates Specificity and Tunability  Nan Hao, Keith E. Shearwin, Ian.
Protein–Protein Communication: Structural Model of the Repression Complex Formed by CytR and the Global Regulator CRP  Birgitte H Kallipolitis, Mads Nørregaard-Madsen,
Arabidopsis ABF3 and ABF4 Transcription Factors Act with the NF-YC Complex to Regulate SOC1 Expression and Mediate Drought-Accelerated Flowering  Keumbi.
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
CCA1 Binds the Promoter of GI in Vitro and in Vivo.
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
DNA Damage-Induced Transcription of Transposable Elements and Long Non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis Is Rare and ATM-Dependent  Zhenxing Wang, Rainer Schwacke,
Presentation transcript:

Capturing Auxin Response Factors Syntax Using DNA Binding Models Arnaud Stigliani, Raquel Martin-Arevalillo, Jérémy Lucas, Adrien Bessy, Thomas Vinos-Poyo, Victoria Mironova, Teva Vernoux, Renaud Dumas, François Parcy  Molecular Plant  Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 822-832 (June 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010 Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Global Analysis of DNA regions and DNA Motifs Bound by MP and ARF2 in DAP-seq (A) Venn diagram of regions bound by ARF2 or MP in DAP-seq. (B) ROC curves and AUC values for MP and ARF2 PWM models. (C) Logo for MP and ARF2 PWMs. Molecular Plant 2019 12, 822-832DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010) Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ARFbs Configuration Enrichment (A) Definition of ERn, DRn, and IRn. (B and C) Over-representation of dimeric ARFbs configurations in DAP-seq regions compared with an unbound set of sequences generated for ARF2 (B) and MP (C). The left panels quantify the absolute enrichment for all ERn, DRn, and IRn (0 ≤ n ≤ 30) compared with the background set. Right panels present the normalized enrichment for each ERn, DRn, and IRn (see Methods). (D) Structural modeling of DR5 and IR13 ARF complexes based on ER7 ARF1 structure (PDB: 4LDX) (Boer et al., 2014). Note that the dimerization interface present on ER7 is absent in the other two configurations. Molecular Plant 2019 12, 822-832DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010) Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Example of ARFbs Configurations Frequency in ARF2- and MP-Bound Regions (A) Venn diagrams colored according to the frequency (in %) of a few ARFbs conformations in MP-specific, ARF2-specific, and MP/ARF2 common regions. (B) Fraction of regions containing at least one AT-rich motif in MP-specific, ARF2-specific, and MP/ARF2 common regions. AT-rich motifs are enriched in ARF2-specific regions as described in the Methods. Molecular Plant 2019 12, 822-832DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010) Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison between PWM and Consensus Sensitivity and Specificity For all graphs, red dots correspond to score thresholds used to plot the PWM ROC curves. For the consensus search, a sequence is considered positive for TGTC, TGTCGG, or TGTCTC if this sequence is present at least once in the DNA region. The ER7-8 models were built as described in the Methods. (A) ARF2 PWM and consensus on ARF2-bound regions. (B) MP PWM and consensus on MP-bound regions. (C) ER7-8 PWM and consensus models on ARF2-bound regions. Molecular Plant 2019 12, 822-832DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010) Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Analysis of IAA19 promoter (A) Arabidopsis IAA19 promoter with position, sequence, and scores of ARFbs. (B) ER8 and its variants used in EMSA. (C) EMSA using ARF2 and MP proteins on probes described in (B) and two mutant probe controls with one (mC) or two mC/mNC sides of the ER8 mutated. ARF2 and MP are used at increasing concentrations: 0, 125, 250, and 500 nM. Color shading indicates difference from consensus. C, consensus; mC, mutant consensus; NC, non-consensus; WC, worst consensus; mNC, mutant non-consensus. Molecular Plant 2019 12, 822-832DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010) Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ARFbs Configuration Enriched in Auxin Upregulated Genes (A and B) Spacing enrichment in promoter regions bound by MP were analyzed in auxin upregulated very high-confidence (A) or high-confidence genes (B) (red colors) and non-auxin-regulated genes (B) (blue colors) at two different score thresholds. The enrichment of ER7/8 and IR13 is increased for the very high confidence auxin upregulated genes. (C) EMSA showing the binding of MP to IR0 and IR13 motifs and the corresponding control mutant probes. MP is used at increasing concentrations: 0, 125, 250, and 500 nM. Molecular Plant 2019 12, 822-832DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.010) Copyright © 2018 The Author Terms and Conditions