Stochastic WNT signaling between nonequivalent cells regulates adhesion but not fate in the two-cell leech embryo  Françoise Z Huang, Alexandra E Bely,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development and Genes Part 1. 2 Development is the process of timed genetic controlled changes that occurs in an organism’s life cycle. Mitosis Cell differentiation.
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
The Spatial Position and Replication Timing of Chromosomal Domains Are Both Established in Early G1 Phase  Daniela S Dimitrova, David M Gilbert  Molecular.
Neuronal RNA Granules Neuron
Evidence for an Upper Limit to Mitotic Spindle Length
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
Genome Transfer Prevents Fragmentation and Restores Developmental Potential of Developmentally Compromised Postovulatory Aged Mouse Oocytes  Mitsutoshi.
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Decoupling of Nuclear Division Cycles and Cell Size during the Coenocytic Growth of the Ichthyosporean Sphaeroforma arctica  Andrej Ondracka, Omaya Dudin,
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Expression of human oocyte-specific linker histone protein and its incorporation into sperm chromatin during fertilization  Yuri Mizusawa, M.D., Naoaki.
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Graham A. Anderson, Lendert Gelens, Julie C. Baker, James E. Ferrell 
TRPV3 Channels Mediate Strontium-Induced Mouse-Egg Activation
The Survivin-like C. elegans BIR-1 Protein Acts with the Aurora-like Kinase AIR-2 to Affect Chromosomes and the Spindle Midzone  Elizabeth K. Speliotes,
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Christopher B. O'Connell, Anne K. Warner, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
The C. elegans DYRK Kinase MBK-2 Marks Oocyte Proteins for Degradation in Response to Meiotic Maturation  Michael L. Stitzel, Jason Pellettieri, Geraldine.
POP-1 and Anterior–Posterior Fate Decisions in C. elegans Embryos
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Valerie Horsley, Katie M Jansen, Stephen T Mills, Grace K Pavlath  Cell 
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
A Comparative Analysis of Spindle Morphometrics across Metazoans
Sophie Louvet-Vallée, Stéphanie Vinot, Bernard Maro  Current Biology 
Temporal and Spatial Control of Germ-Plasm RNAs
Naohito Takatori, Gaku Kumano, Hidetoshi Saiga, Hiroki Nishida 
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Dian-Han Kuo, David A. Weisblat  Current Biology 
Intra-spindle Microtubule Assembly Regulates Clustering of Microtubule-Organizing Centers during Early Mouse Development  Sadanori Watanabe, Go Shioi,
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Joseph T. Rodgers, Matthew D. Schroeder, Chanthia Ma, Thomas A. Rando 
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Cortical Flows Powered by Asymmetrical Contraction Transport PAR Proteins to Establish and Maintain Anterior-Posterior Polarity in the Early C. elegans.
Localized PEM mRNA and Protein Are Involved in Cleavage-Plane Orientation and Unequal Cell Divisions in Ascidians  Takefumi Negishi, Tatsuki Takada, Narudo.
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Jessica L. Feldman, James R. Priess  Current Biology 
Cell-Cycle Progression without an Intact Microtubule Cytoskeleton
Asymmetric Segregation of PIE-1 in C
Zebrafish as a Model Organism for the Identification and Characterization of Drugs and Genes Affecting p53 Signaling  Ulrike Langheinrich, Elisabeth Hennen,
Permeability Barrier Disruption Increases the Level of Serine Palmitoyltransferase in Human Epidermis  Francesca Alessandrini, Dr., Heidrun Behrendt 
The Spatial Position and Replication Timing of Chromosomal Domains Are Both Established in Early G1 Phase  Daniela S Dimitrova, David M Gilbert  Molecular.
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division  Becket Feierbach, Fred Chang  Current Biology 
Julie C Canman, David B Hoffman, E.D Salmon  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Markus Kaspar, Axel Dienemann, Christine Schulze, Frank Sprenger 
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Stochastic WNT signaling between nonequivalent cells regulates adhesion but not fate in the two-cell leech embryo  Françoise Z Huang, Alexandra E Bely, David A Weisblat  Current Biology  Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (January 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00028-2

Figure 1 Lineage diagram for stages 1–4a of Helobdella robusta. In this hermaphroditic annelid, eggs are fertilized internally and arrest in metaphase I of meiosis until after zygote (Z) deposition. Cleavages (horizontal lines) are stereotyped, and this along with the fact that most are unequal gives rise to identified cells (AB, CD, A, B, C, D, D′ and d′; denoted by vertical lines). Corresponding developmental stages (St) and time (minutes) after zygote deposition (AZD) are indicated on the timeline at left. Line drawings at right represent embryos viewed from the animal pole. Shading indicates yolk-deficient cytoplasm, which arises from cytoplasmic reorganization following polar body (pb) formation and is inherited by the D lineage precursor cell in the early divisions Current Biology 2001 11, 1-7DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00028-2)

Figure 2 Normal patterns of Hro-wnt-A protein and mRNA expression in early development. (a) Photographs of embryos immunostained for HRO-WNT-A at various times and viewed from the animal pole. The timeline is as in Figure 1. Cell identities are indicated for one specimen of each stage. Preliminary experiments revealed little or no HRO-WNT-A secretion prior to 275 min AZD or during stage 3 (see text for details). Thickenings of the timeline indicate time periods during which all batches of embryos gave the same distribution of staining patterns. Numbers in parentheses indicate the distribution of different staining patterns for each period. At various time points, a minority of embryos (not shown) either failed to stain or showed faint and hybrid patterns consistent with transitions in the staining pattern. In particular, 9/9 embryos fixed at 320 min AZD gave faint staining of both AB and CD (not shown). The scale bar represents 200 μm. (b) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis reveals maternal and zygotic expression of Hro-wnt-A. Top: ethidium bromide-stained gel showing Hro-wnt-A and 18S rRNA bands from the stages indicated. This is the raw data for experiment 1. Bottom: graph showing the relative levels of Hro-wnt-A at the stages indicated, with stage 1 defined as 1. Triangles (orange) and circles (blue) represent data from experiments 1 and 2, respectively (see Materials and methods for details) Current Biology 2001 11, 1-7DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00028-2)

Figure 3 HRO-WNT-A staining in experimentally manipulated embryos. Numbers in parentheses indicate the numbers of embryos showing a particular staining pattern for each period. The timeline is as in Figure 2; experimental manipulations are indicated at left. Embryos injected with α-amanitin at mid–stage 1 (approximately 120 min AZD) exhibited staining patterns similar to those of control embryos except that cell CD stained less intensely than cell AB during the stochastic phase and not at all during the deterministic phase. Isolated AB and CD blastomeres were obtained from devitellinized embryos as soon as cytokinesis was complete; both cells in each pair stained at time points throughout stage 2. Devitellinized embryos stain uniformly from the start of cytokinesis until near the end of stage 2, at which time cell CD stains more prominently; these embryos also show strong staining in various blastomeres during stage 3, in contrast to control embryos (compare to Figure 2a). Devitellinized embryos embedded in agarose, by contrast, typically exhibit procession of stochastic and deterministic staining patterns as normal embryos; unaccounted-for embryos failed to stain. The scale bar represents 400 μm Current Biology 2001 11, 1-7DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00028-2)

Figure 4 Selected images from a time lapse video comparing first and second cell divisions in synchronized sibling embryos that were either intact (left), devitellinized (center), or devitellinized and bathed in anti-HRO-WNT-A. In this experiment, images were taken every 3 min for approximately 4 hr, starting at the onset of first cleavage (243 min AZD). For each row of images, the number at the far right indicates developmental time (minutes AZD). The images in each row were aligned digitally. Cell labels in the lefthand column indicate the completion of each mitosis; thus, the zygote (Z) cleaved at approximately 273 min AZD, cell CD cleaved at approximately 431 min AZD, and cell AB cleaved at approximately 452 min AZD. The scale bar represents 400 microns Current Biology 2001 11, 1-7DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00028-2)