ACSF B1+C functional description

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRSP December 2001 Session - P. CASTAING 1 ISOFIX SYSTEMS INTEGRATION IN R14, R16, R44.
Advertisements

ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
3:00. 2:59 2:58 2:57 2:56 2:55 2:54 2:53 2:52.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
Conditional Automation (Level 3) Use-Case Description Submitted by the Experts of OICA as Input to the IWG ITS/AD November 3, 2015 Geneva Submitted by.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
1 Survey on the transition time from ACSF to Manual Driving Toyota Motor Corporation Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the expert of Japan.
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Submitted by expert from the Republic of
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Lane change driver reaction times
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Top Fire Protection Services Ottawa available on Dubinskyconstruction
Submitted by the expert of France and the Secretary
Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Report and explanation document of SBR-TF
Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles
Status report GRSP IWG FI
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Signalling of information and warnings
4n + 2 1st term = 4 × = 6 2nd term = 4 × = 10 3rd term
Passing other Vehicles
ACSF B1+C functional description
ACSF – Automated Driving Systems Taxonomy and Definitions - SAE J3016 Jean-Michel Roy Transport Canada.
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin
Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems
KEYLESS ENTRY PUSH TO START BACK UP CAMERA.
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Maximum allowable Override Force
ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances
TF Reversing Alarm Report to GRB 67th
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
OICA Comments to GRE/2017/17 and GRE/2017/22
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
Complete Vehicle Systems.
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases
Presentation transcript:

ACSF B1+C functional description Submitted by the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document: ACSF-10-05-Rev 1 10th ACSF meeting Paris, 11.-13. January 2017 ACSF B1+C functional description

ACSF B1+C functional description Examples For discussion only B1 resumes During the lane change, the driver steers between virtual lane markings, which are defined to deliver a smooth and stable lane change. Lane change manoeuver Less than 15s for M1 N1, 30s for M2 N2 M3 N3 2nd action Lane change procedure B1 stops At least 3 flashing and less than 15s 1st action

ACSF B1+C functional description Examples For discussion only B1 resumes During the lane change, the driver steers between virtual lane markings, which are defined to deliver a smooth and stable lane change. Lane change manoeuver Less than 15s for M1 N1, 30s for M2 N2 M3 N3 2nd action Lane change procedure B1 stops At least 3 flashing and less than 15s The vehicle slightly drifts in the lane to improve rearward visibility. Yet, this is not the start of the lane change manoeuver. 1st action