Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Casulo C et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 510.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4.
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients with Poor Prognosis Large B-Cell Lymphoma, with Analysis of Germinal Center and Activated B-Cell.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI is Highly Active as Single-Agent Therapy in Previously-Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Preliminary.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scan Performed During and at the End of Treatment with R-CHOP in High- Tumor Mass Follicular.
Second Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Study of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab (R) for Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Efficacy Analysis in Patient.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
R-CHOP with Iodine-131 Tositumomab Consolidation for Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0433 Friedberg.
Nabhan C et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 102.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Phase II SAKK 35/10 Trial: Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide Shows Durable Activity in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Vose JM et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 661.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
A Phase III Randomized Intergroup Trial (SWOG S0016) of CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab vs CHOP Chemotherapy plus Iodine-131-Tositumomab for the Treatment.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 732.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Platzbecker U et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 12.
IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Fujiwara H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 181.
Jabbour E et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 83.
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Kahl BS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract LBA-6.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Attal M et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8018.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Salles GA et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8004.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Boccadoro M et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8020.
Wiestner A et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 008.
Presentation transcript:

Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265. Identification of Patient Subgroups Demonstrating Longer Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Benefit with Bortezomib-Rituximab versus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (FL): Biomarker Analyses of the Phase 3 LYM3001 Study Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Background In order to optimize treatment in individual patients, it is essential to identify the patient subgroup that is most likely to benefit from a specific therapy. The Phase III LYM3001 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes with bortezomib/rituximab versus rituximab treatment alone (Lancet Oncol 2011;12:773). However, these results were reported in an unselected patient population. Objective: Present exploratory biomarker analyses of LYM3001 to identify patient subgroups most likely to derive a longer PFS benefit and also showing a trend for better overall survival (OS) with bortezomib/rituximab therapy. Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Phase III LYM3001 Trial Design Eligibility (n = 676) Relapsed or refractory Grade 1 or 2 FL Rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive disease No active CNS lymphoma Adequate hematological, renal and hepatic functions Bortezomib/rituximab (V-R) (n = 336) R Rituximab (R) (n = 340) Response was assessed with modified International Working Group response criteria. Archived tumor tissue was collected at baseline. Whole blood samples for germline DNA testing were collected on d1 of treatment. Protocol-specified candidate biomarkers were based on associations with V (NF-kB, p65, PSMA5, p27, PSMB1/5/8/9) or R (CD68, FCGR2A/3A) activity. Further analysis included the division of all biomarker-evaluable patients into discovery and confirmation cohorts. Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Single Markers and Biomarker Pairs Indicating Subgroups with Improved Clinical Outcomes (Abstract) Outcome with V-R over R Markers* (n = 102) PFS ≥6 months 14 pairs Significantly improved PFS (p < 0.0001) 1 pair† * Single markers and biomarker pairs highlighting patient subsets with significantly improved outcomes with V-R versus R therapy. † Using false discovery rate (FDR) to control for multiple comparison corrections, the biomarker pair is presence of PSMB1 P11A C/G heterozygote and low CD68 expression (0-50 CD68-positive macrophages in the follicular space). Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Efficacy Outcomes in All Patients with the Presence of PSMB1 P11A C/G and Low CD68 (Abstract) Outcome (n = 356)* V-R R HR p-value FDR Median PFS 16.6 mo 9.1 mo 0.407 <0.0001 0.051 Median OS Not reached 0.426 0.055 — Overall response rate 73.7% 47.5% 0.0077 Complete response rate 33.3% 23% 0.3044 Median time to next therapy 33.1 mo 14.8 mo 0.0013 * Biomarker evaluable patients; HR = hazard ratio; FDR = false discovery rate Frequency of biomarker pair in patients offering a significant PFS benefit: 33% Patients with high-risk features were represented in the biomarker-selected population: High tumor burden: 54%; high FLIP1: 41%; >2 prior lines of therapy: 30% In patients lacking this biomarker pair (n = 238), there were no significant differences in efficacy outcomes Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Confirmation cohort (n = 108) Efficacy Results with the Presence of PSMB1 P11A C/G and Low CD68: Cohort Classification (Abstract) Outcome Discovery cohort (n = 198) V-R R HR p-value Median PFS 14.2 mo 8.4 mo — 0.0003 OS 0.47 0.1291 Confirmation cohort (n = 108) 18.2 mo 9.5 mo 0.44 0.0817 Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Author Conclusions The analyses of the Phase III LYM3001 trial identified biomarker combinations in one third of patients offering a significant PFS benefit with bortezomib/rituximab therapy versus rituximab alone. The use of biomarker assays in patients with relapsed or refractory FL may aid in the identification of patient subgroups deriving maximal benefits from bortezomib/rituximab therapy. Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.

Investigator Commentary: Identification of Patient Subgroups Demonstrating Longer PFS Benefit with V-R versus R in Relapsed or Refractory FL — Biomarker Analysis of LYM3001 This is a correlative study of the Phase III LYM3001 trial. Although there was a statistically significant benefit of the V-R treatment arm of the LYM3001 trial, it is not necessarily the result of a biologic or clinical difference. This is because V-R only extended PFS by a few weeks and it is well known that the addition of bortezomib to the treatment regimen increases toxicity. In addition, the LYM3001 trial did not include maintenance therapy, which may have lengthened the PFS. This study attempts to find patient groups that may particularly benefit from the addition of bortezomib. The study concludes stating that such a group, where PFS was almost doubled with V-R treatment, was identified. Although some form of statistical adjustment for corrections was used, without a validation group, this study is merely hypothesis generating. In practice, therefore, these data cannot be used to determine the choice of therapy until further research is performed in this area. Interview with Jonathan W Friedberg, MD, MMSc, January 11, 2012