Unit 2 AO3 - Interpretations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WJEC GCSE HISTORY UNIT 1 [Depth studies] UNIT 2 [Depth & Thematic studies] Feedback on the 2011 Examination.
Advertisements

© Cambridge International Examinations 2013 Component/Paper 1.
ACADEMIC TUTORIAL Extended Essay Writing. TODAY WE WILL AIM TO TODAY... ACTIVITY 1: Marking Exercise (20 mins) Reading through 2 candidate answers identifying.
How To Answer Source Questions
How to write a good Higher Essay
The French Revolution Exam focus: OCR Elizabeth Francis Philip Allan Publishers © 2015.
How to structure good history writing Always put an introduction which explains what you are going to talk about. Always put a conclusion which summarises.
EXAM SKILLS: PAPER ONE: QUESTIONS. CARTOON See cartoon questions in paper two section.
How to write 12M Questions AO1 - FACTS AND THEORIES Get marks by describing and recalling psychological knowledge and understanding. AO2 - APPLICATION.
A Level Coursework Russian Revolutions Interpretations Essay Guidance.
 Analyse a significant historical trend and the force(s) that influenced it  TREND-a series of related events that has a range of causes and that illustrates.
Constitutional Flexibility. Enduring Questions Independent Investigation Essay How to write a good essay.
Power: Monarchy and Democracy in Britain c.1000 to 2014
WJEC Eduqas GCSE (9-1) in HISTORY For teaching from 2016
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Unit 1 Question Style: USA
UNIT 5: NON EXAMINED ASSESSMENT
Understanding Standards
AS to A Level Understanding the standard
Answering exam questions GCSE Physical Education
Do you agree with the message in the source?
What is being assessed? Section B will contain three essay questions of which students are required to answer two. Each essay tests AO1 and is designed.
Thinking Skills Paper 2.
England – A New Century AS History Source Paper Revision Overview
Warning: you need to study
Strengths & Weaknesses
Paper 3: Weimar and Nazi Germany
GCSE Paper This presentation goes through paper one detailing the different question types and what you are required to do with each one. Paper One will.
Welcome to IBDP History
NET History Exam Skills
Section A focuses on the historic environment – Western Front WW1.
LO: To revise the nature of war and revolution
The best historians:.
The Tudor Exam.
What you need to do for the Assignment
Assessment of NEA Assessment Objective Mark
Edexcel – GCSE History – Paper 1
..
Describe two features of…
GCSE ENGLISH LITERATURE J360
Question 6 Read the examiners comments
AS LEVEL Paper One – Section A / B
Section 1: What is ‘developed’ explanation?
NET History Exam Skills
WJEC GCE Geography Guidance for Teachers: Assessment at AS/A level.
Understanding success evening 11th October 2018
How To Answer Source Questions
The Mid Tudors A2 Evaluation and enquiry questions
The Mid Tudors AS Evaluation and enquiry questions
Exam Technique - 30 Mark Question
NEA What makes a good answer?
NET History Exam Skills
LO: Why did Churchill become PM in 1940?
A LEVEL Paper Three– Section A
The Thematic Essay Questions set will require coverage of the whole period, which will be of at least 100 years. The whole period will not need to be covered.
QUESTION: Why and with what success did Alexander II impose so many reforms? Topic: Explain the reasons why Alexander II might have introduced reforms.
Exam technique.
GCE AS History Revision
How far do you agree with this statement?  
What is being assessed? Section B will contain three essay questions of which students are required to answer two. Each essay tests AO1 and is designed.
What is being assessed? Section B will contain three essay questions of which students are required to answer two. But for your mock you will get two.
NEA Feedback.
Analyse a significant historical trend and the force(s) that influenced it (3.6)
How to structure 01 A Level Stuarts answers
NET History Exam Skills
Source Viewer Do you have any wider knowledge that relates to this source? Is this a primary or secondary source? What does the source want the reader.
Megan Smoot 4th Quarter Project 5/1/19
Analysing the Essay Rubric
What makes a good essay? Preparing your students for C3.
How to structure 01 A Level Stuarts answers
Presentation transcript:

Unit 2 AO3 - Interpretations From OCR Guidance booklet: “The key to high-scoring answers will be recognition that the past has been debated about, that different views are held over particular issues, and the application of knowledge through which candidates can present the strengths and limitations of a given interpretation.”

What is an interpretation? From OCR Guidance booklet: “The interpretations selected will always be deliberate constructs by historians, produced much later than the historical event.” DO NOT EVALUATE THE PASSAGES FOR PROVENANCE Provenance is not an issue. Historiography is not an issue (though the views of other historians might be use, this is not necessary, and discussion of ‘Marxist schools’ or shortcomings of the ‘revisionist school’ on a topic won’t help.

Level 6 A 26 - 30 The answer has a very good focus on the question throughout. It has thorough and sustained evaluation of the interpretations, using detailed and accurate knowledge of the historical context and the wider historical debate around the issue, in order to produce a convincing and supported analysis of them in relation to the question.

Level 6 A 26 - 30 The answer has a very good focus on the question throughout. It has thorough and sustained evaluation of the interpretations, using detailed and accurate knowledge of the historical context and the wider historical debate around the issue, in order to produce a convincing and supported analysis of them in relation to the question. Level 5 B 21 - 25 The answer has a good focus on the question throughout. It has good evaluation of the interpretations, using relevant knowledge of the historical context and the wider historical debate around the issue, in order to produce a supported analysis of them in relation to the question. Level 4 C 16 – 20 The answer is mostly focused on the question. It has evaluation of the interpretations based on generally relevant knowledge of the historical context and the wider historical debate around the issue, in order to produce an analysis of them in relation to the question. Level 3 D 11 – 15 The answer is partially focused on the question. It has partial evaluation of the interpretations based on some knowledge of the historical context and the wider historical debate around the issue. There may be some use of information from one of the two interpretations to support the evaluation of the other, but the evaluation will not rely on this. There is a limited analysis of the interpretations in relation to the question. Level 2 E 6 – 10 The answer has a limited focus on the question. Parts of the answer are just description of the interpretations, with evaluation in relation to historical context and the wider historical debate around the issue being weak, and evaluation relying heavily on information drawn from the other interpretation. There is a very limited analysis of the interpretations in relation to the question. Level 1 N - U 0 – 5 The answer has some relevance to the topic, but not the specific question. The answer consists mostly of description of the interpretations with very limited evaluation based on very generalised knowledge of historical context and minimal or no reference to the wider historical debate. Analysis of the interpretations in relation to the question is either in the form of assertion or lacking.

Analysing interpretations Read the two passages twice. Identify the different interpretations. Colour code the two views and the evidence deployed. Assess strengths & weaknesses of each using your own knowledge. Decide which is most convincing. Lead with the view that you agree with least.

From OCR Exemplar material – Tudor Rebellions This first answer would be awarded full marks and it is possible to envisage an answer of slightly less quality also gaining full marks. It evaluates both passages very fully, applying detailed own knowledge to judge the validity of the views in the two passages and reaches a clear and developed judgement. However, it should be noted that the detail in the answer is no more than that found in a chapter on the Pilgrimage of Grace in a standard book used for teaching Tudor Rebellions.

Structure Introduction Explain the views in the passages and tie these directly to the key terms in the question One to two paragraphs analysing the weakest interpretation. View – Quote – Develop One to two paragraphs analysing the stronger interpretation. View – Quote - Develop Sustained conclusion Which view best supported ?

Chief examiner feedback Better answers fully analysed both interpretations using their own knowledge to test the arguments of the passages. Better answers contrast the messages of the passages in their introduction, and had a sustained conclusion. The evaluation passages had nuance and sophisticated language. Weaker students either paraphrased (described) the passages or used the sources as garnish to a general discussion of the topic. It is easy to be over dependent on omission. This should not really be the central plank of an argument, but obviously may be more important with some passages rather than others. A trap that some fell into in with those questions that struck a vein of a historiographical debate was to analyse the debate rather than the passages. It might seem counter-intuitive, but perhaps a question on Khrushchev might produce stronger answers than one on the Tsar Liberator.

Chief examiner feedback - continued Do not over obsess with the quality of the historical debate of the topic. This is not a historiographical paper. Hence, whilst the debate is clear on Alexander II and the fall of the Provisional Government, obviously it is weaker on Khrushchev. The key point is that the two passages will have a (sharp) distinction to engage with. Interpretations should be viewed “as they are presented”. They should be viewed in isolation. Students must be confident as they analyse the passages, and especially when they must conclude which passage is stronger and why. They should try to consider the relative worth of the different strands of the passage’s arguments. The use of knowledge is central – but it must not be dumped. Students need to know to A level (not undergraduate) standard.