EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns Summer 06 and Winter 07

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optical Properties of Aerosol Particles Introduction Atmospheric aerosol particles play a significant role in determining Earth's climate, through their.
Advertisements

Soot Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application T. B. Onasch,A. Trimborn,E. C. Fortner,J. T. Jayne,G. L. Kok,L.
A Project to Characterize The Effects of Transient Air Pollutants on the Health of African-Americans in Atlanta, Georgia John H. Hall Morehouse College.
Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands – A year-long radiocarbon study Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
R&P 8400S and 8400N Ambient Particulate Sulfate and Nitrate Monitors: Performance during PMTACS-NY Intensive Field Campaigns and Routine Measurements (Poster.
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Biogenic Sulfate in the Arctic and its Contribution to Aerosol Growth and IN Activation A.L. Norman NETCARE Meeting Nov. 19, 2013 Atmospheric & Environmental.
Russian Soot Measurement Methodologies Alexander Romanov Scientific Research Institute for atmospheric air protection St.Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Investigation of Decadal Changes in Aerosol and Asthma Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Accent Plus Symposium, Urbino, Italy, Sep2013 Observations of Enhanced Black Carbon radiative forcing over an Urban Environment A.S.Panicker, G.
Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive- Measuring-Campaigns at Melpitz site (German lowlands, Saxony) Summer 2006 and Winter 2007 – Planned possible.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Comparison of gravimetric PM data from the Harvard Impactors and Gent Stacked Unit PM 10 Samplers in Prague 2004 M. CIVIŠ 1, J. HOVORKA 1 and J. SCHWARZ.
Characterization of Aerosol Physical, Optical and Chemical Properties During the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study (BRAVO) Jenny.
Proposal for a Research Infrastructure for Advanced Aerosol Observations and Capacity Building in China Alfred WIEDENSOHLER Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric.
Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
ASCOS Planned Aerosol Instrumentation Aboard Oden Douglas Orsini Jost Heintzenberg Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research Leipzig, Germany.
SUBMICRON AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A SMALL SETTLEMENT NEAR HIGHWAY J. HOVORKA, Z. STAŇKOVÁ Institute for Environmental.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
1 The roles of H 2 SO 4 and organic species in the growth of newly formed particles in the rural environment Wu Zhijun Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric.
Implementation of Male’ Declaration on Control and Prevention of Air Pollution and its Likely Transboundary Effects for South Asia MALDIVES 12 – 13 September.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Contributions of Organic Compound Pollutants to Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter in Mexicali, Mexico Jonathan O. Allen, Daniel A. Gonzales, Qinyue Sun.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
COMPARISON OF APS AND BETA AS CONTINUOUS MONITORS FOR MEASURING PM10 CONCENTRATIONS IN URBAN AIR Devraj Thimmaiah, Jan Hovorka Institute for Environmental.
Temporal Variations of 7Be and its AMAD over “Demokritos” GAW station
Weather Data Summary.
Environmental monitoring at EARS
OBSERVATION ON ION DYNAMICS
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL: suspension of condensed-phase particles in air
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Size-segregated characterization of PM10 with five stage BERNER-impactors at Melpitz (Germany) – a six year study G. Spindler, A. Grüner, K. Müller, Y.
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
Concentrations of particulate matter in France : results and key findings Olivier Le Bihan, François Mathe, Jean-Luc Houdret, Bertrand Bessagnet, Patrice.
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
John Munthe and Ingvar Wängberg
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada
Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive-
Rationalizing the differences between thermo-optical OC/EC methods.
Rami Alfarra, Urs Baltensperger: Paul Scherrer Institute, CH.
Ari Laaksonen, Jukka Rukkainen: University of Kopio, FI.
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Urban and Airborne Measurements with a PILS Desi Toom-Sauntry, Kathy Hayden, Gang Lu, Shao-Meng Li, Jeff Brook, Walter Strapp, Richard Leaitch Meteorological.
Time-Integrated Sampling
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
Challenges with Integrated Measurements of OC and BC (or EC)
Longer Term Aerosol Chemical speciation monitoring data during ACTRIS/EMEP activities ACSM Teams across Europe Many slides from Michael Bressi, JRC Italy.
H. Fagerli, TFMM Bordeux, april 2008
EUSAAR contribution to the EMEP intensive field campaigns
Title Why do we underestimate Elemental Carbon in PM?
Jean-Philippe Putaud, Fabrizia Cavalli
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
EC/OC – monitoring within EMEP
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns Summer 06 and Winter 07 First Results of the EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns Summer 06 and Winter 07 at Melpitz site (German lowlands, Saxony) G. Spindler1, E. Brüggemann1, T. Gnauk1, A. Grüner1, K. Müller1, Th.M.Tuch3, M.Wallasch2, B. Wehner1, A. Wiedensohler1, H. Herrmann1 1Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 2UFZ Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 3Umweltbundesamt, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau, Germany A national contribution to EMEP Database CONVENTION ON LONG-RANGE TRANSBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION TFMM workshop Dessau, 25 April – 27 April 2007

Evolution of half-hourly PM10-mass concentration and precipitation in winter (November until April) and summer (May until October) at Melpitz site in the least 14 years. The half yearly precipitation sum is plotted as inverse.

Campaigns in Winter and Summer Time-slots of the summer and winter EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-campaigns in the daily long-time PM10-Mesurements at Melpitz site

Winter-campaign Summer-campaign Time series of daily particle mass concentration PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 (May 2004 until October 2006) with indicator for air mass origin and time-slots for the winter- and summer-campaign

Meteorological parameters during the EMEP intensive campaigns at Melpitz site (1) Difference from normal climate (1971-2000) for daily mean temparature at the Meteorological Institute of the Leipzig University® 2007 until April 17 2006 Temparature and relative Humidity at Melpitz site June 2006 January/February 2007

Meteorological parameters during the EMEP intensive campaigns at Melpitz site (2) Global radiation and wind velocity at Melpitz site Wind direction and precipitation at Melpitz site June 2006 January/February 2007

Overview of data for the EMEP intensive campaigns at Melpitz site MAAP, Multi Angel Absorption Photometer (Model 5012) TOF-AMS, Particle-Mass-Spectrometer (Aerodyne, USA) Berner, 5-stage-BERNER-type-impactor (mass, water soluble ions, organic and elemental carbon, OC, EC) GRIMM Type ESVC 265, optical detection of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 TDMPS TDMPS (twin-differential-mobility-particle-sizer) with APS (aerodynamic-particle-sizer) in combination with a thermo-denuder █ no data X data available For the AMS also data for 9.,10.,11. and 12. February and for the Berner data also for the 7. February available

Summer (1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days 32 days PM10 18.91 + 6.30 PM10 16.60 + 7.28 PM2.5 13.98 + 6.14 PM2.5 12.30 + 7.18 PM1 9.97 + 4.29 PM1 7.71 + 4.41 Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 Mass-concentration

Nitrate-concentration Summer (1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days 32 days PM10 1.09 + 1.22 PM10 2.96 + 2.31 PM2.5 0.55 + 0.90 PM2.5 2.46 + 2.16 PM1 0.30 + 0.55 PM1 0.66 + 1.56 Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 Nitrate-concentration

Sulphate-concentration Summer (1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days 32 days PM10 2.84 + 1.10 PM10 1.72 + 0.97 PM2.5 2.66 + 1.05 PM2.5 1.53 + 2.16 PM1 2.36 + 0.93 PM1 0.85 + 0.62 Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 Sulphate-concentration

Ammonium-concentration Summer (1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days 32 days PM10 1.03 + 0.36 PM10 1.20 + 0.92 PM2.5 1.04 + 0.33 PM2.5 1.13 + 0.89 PM1 0.93 + 0.28 PM1 0.86 + 0.66 Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 Ammonium-concentration

Comparison of half-hourly PM10-Measurements of an optical Device (Type ESVC 265, Fa. GRIMM, Germany) with daily PM10 data from the DIGITEL N=30 June 2006

Comparison of half-hourly PM10-Measurements of an optical Device (Type ESVC 265, Fa. GRIMM, Germany) with daily PM10 data from the DIGITEL N=32 January/February 2007

2006-06-05 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer) June 2006 2006-06-05 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer)

2006-06-12 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer) June 2006 2006-06-12 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer)

2006-06-25 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer) June 2006 2006-06-25 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer)

2007-01-15 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter) January/February 2007 2007-01-15 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter)

2007-01-27 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter) January/February 2007 2007-01-27 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter)

2007-02-08 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter) January/February 2007 2007-02-08 Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter)

Structure of the Boxplot Mass minumum lower Quartile upper Quartile mean value maximum Structure of the Boxplot Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (1)

Sulphate Ammonium Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (2)

Nitrate Chloride Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (3)

OC EC Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (4)

PM10 Particle mass concentration [ng/m³] Measurements with the MAAP, Example for 10 days in June 2006, minute-means

Comparison of black carbon determination from DIGITEL- Filters as EC (VDI-2465 page 2) and an optical determination with an Multi Angel Absorption Photometer (MAAP, Model 5012) for the summer and winter campaigns Database daily means TC = OC + EC

TDMPS (twin-differential-mobility-particle-sizer) with APS (aerodynamic-particle-sizer) Example for one day in June 2006 January/February 2007 Evolution of number size distributions of ambient aerosols (upper figures) and of non-volatile particle fractions behind the thermodenuder (lower figures)

for the EMEP-summer- and -winter-campaign. June 2006 January/February 2007 Evolution of number size distributions of ambient aerosols (upper figures) and of non-volatile particle fractions behind the thermodenuder (lower figures) as a mean for the EMEP-summer- and -winter-campaign.

! Summary We can provide data for both EMEP-Intensive campaigns for DIGITEL High Volume Sampler (daily means, PM1, PM2.5 and PM10) MAAP, Multi Angel Absorption Photometer (Model 5012) (Minute means) Berner, 5-stage-BERNER-type-impactor (mass, water soluble ions, organic and elemental carbon, OC, EC) (daily means for selected days,13 during summer and 15 during winter campaign) GRIMM Type ESVC 265, optical detection of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 (half-hourly means) TDMPS TDMPS (twin-differential-mobility-particle-sizer) with APS (aerodynamic-particle-sizer) in combination with a thermo-denuder (10 minute means and daily contour plots) TOF-AMS, Particle-Mass-Spectrometer (data in winter campaign available) Especially the time slot of the winter campaign shows only situations with westerly winds and the Winter 2006/2007 was in Germany extremely mild. The comparison of both campaigns therefore give very untypical results for the Melpitz site. They are differ from that of long-time observations. !

Particulate Matter reasons We acknowledge the support from the Umweltbundesamt in Germany (projects 351 01 022 and 351 01 031) and continuation of measurements in 2006/07 (project 351 01 38) We would like to thank Jörn Hanß, Eveline Neumann, Annelie Thomas, Helga Mamczak, Brigitte Gerlach and Anett Kappe. actions