End of IPv4 … And the road ahead … for AP-WG

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 30 June 2005.

Advertisements

Axel Pawlik. 4 th ASO GA Meeting, 24 April 2003, Santiago. Open Policy Process in the RIPE Region Axel Pawlik RIPE NCC.

Erik Bais, May 15 th 2013 PP Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members Presenter : Erik Bais –

R I P E N e t w o r k C o o r d i n a t i o n C e n t r e. h t t p : / / w w w. r i p e. n e t. n c r i p e. n e t 1 The Internet Registry System IPv4.

(dead) Inter-RIR Transfers to become 2014-xx (new text) Sandra Brown IPv4 Market Group.

December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 December.

March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.

IP Address Management The RIR System & IP policy

Update on RIPE NCC Inter- RIR Transfer proposal Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.

IANA Activities Update RIPE 68 Warsaw, Poland May 2014.

First Timers’ Breakfast Susan Hamlin Director, Communications and Member Services.

1 ARIN: Mission, Role and Services John Curran ARIN President and CEO.

Copyright © 2011 Japan Network Information Center JPNIC ’ s RQA and Routing Related Activities JPNIC IP Department Izumi Okutani APNIC32 Aug 2011, Busan.

An overview of IP addressing history and policy issues Leo Vegoda Number Resources Manager, IANA.

Mirjam Kühne 1 RIPE 33, May 1999 Introduction to the RIPE NCC presented by Mirjam Kühne.

APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,

Mirjam Kühne 1 EC, Oct Policy Development in RIPE & the RIPE NCC Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.

Erik Bais, May 13 th 2015 PP – unassigned yet General Transfer Policy Presenter : Erik Bais –

Feedback from RIPE NCC Registration Services Alex Le Heux, RIPE NCC RIPE64 Ljubljana.

Multi6 Working Group IETF-61, Washington D.C November 8-12, 2004.

A Review of Policy Development Processes in the Asia Pacific Region Address Policy SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 27 February 2003.

First Timers’ Breakfast Richard Jimmerson Chief Information Officer.

Connect Report from the BoF Remco van Mook. Background At RIPE67, the EIX WG decided to dissolve itself to make room for a new WG A group of people resolved.

Unintended side-effects Amending the transfer policy (soon to be called ) James Blessing, Sandra Brown, Remco van Mook.

Erik Bais, Nov 5 th 2014 PP Allow IPv6 Transfers Presenter : Erik Bais –

Welcome to Your First ARIN Meeting. Handouts for you Basic information Acronym list ARIN fact sheets – ARIN at a Glance – Policy Development Process –

Keith Mitchell 1 RIPE 33, May 1999 RIPE NCC Executive Board Report Keith Mitchell ICANN Address Supporting Organisation.

Erik Bais, May 5 th 2011 PP Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 Presenter : Erik Bais –

Rob Blokzijl, RIPE 64, April 2012 IPv4 Maintenance Policy.

Current Policy Topics Emilio Madaio RIPE NCC RIPE November 2010, Rome.

1 The Internet Registry System Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC EC-POP Brussels 5 July 1999.

1 Is HD ratio mechanism too complex? Jan Žorž (just asking questions)

Prop-077: Proposal to supplement transfer policy of historical IPv4 addresses Wendy Zhao Wei, Jane Zhang & Terence Zhang Yinghao.

Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Conference, 11 May Operational Co-ordination in the RIPE Region presented by: Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.

Internet Governance: A View From the RIPE NCC Paul Rendek Director External Relations, RIPE NCC Ukrainian Internet Governance Forum 2-3 September 2011.

Axel Pawlik. Regional Symposium on E-gov’t and IP, 24 November 2004, Dubai. Busting Internet Myths An Introduction to the RIPE NCC.

8 th Address Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Yong Wan Ju Kenny Huang Chair/co-Chairs of APNIC Address Policy SIG.

Regional Internet Registries An Overview

20 Years of the RIPE NCC: Where Are We Today?

SACM Virtual Interim Meeting

IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)

Why IPv6 now? Mathieu Goutelle (CNRS/UREC)

TRILL Working Group TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links

ARIN Board of Trustees Report

IPv6 Update Andrea Cima Registration Services Manager, RIPE NCC

Internet Governance Hui

A Coordinated Proposal Regional Internet Registries

Introduction to ARIN and the Internet Registry System

IP Statistics Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total /24 Equivalents Issued*

RIPE Policy Landscape Filiz Yilmaz ESNOG, February 2008.

Introduction to IP Addressing & IPv6 Deployment Status

SPRING IETF-98 Tuesday, March 28.

Locking down the final /8 Remco van Mook

Policy Development Processes in the APNIC Region

A view from ARIN, LACNIC & RIPE Communities Laura Cobley

PP – Resource Authentication Key ( RAK ) code for third party authentication Presenter : Erik Bais –

Your favorite wG.

Prop-078-V002: IPv6 deployment criteria for IPv4 final /8 delegations

Policy Development Process

Experimental Internet Resource Allocations

IPv6 distribution and policy update

RIPE NCC Update APNIC 18 Axel is a pilot and this is an aerial view of Amsterdam.

ADDRESS SUPPORT ORGANIZATION

IPv6 Address Space Management A follow up to RIPE-261

Status Report on Policy Implementation at the APNIC Secretariat

PP – RIPE Resource Transfer Policies

RIPE Address Policy Working Group May 22, 2018, Reykjavik

PP Allow AS Number Transfers

Policy Development Process

James Blessing, Sandra Brown,

Presentation transcript:

End of IPv4 … And the road ahead … for AP-WG Presenter : Erik Bais – ebais @a2b-internet.com

The end of the road …

IETF – IPv4 – Declared - Historic

We need to shift our focus …

It is time to change AP-WG … Either we need to stop AP-WG … and move to new P-WG (Policy Working Group) Or We need to change the current charter and only focus on current / future protocols.

Or … ?? < fill in the blank > outside the box …

From LIR-WG to AP-WG to P-WG During RIPE45 (May 2003), LIR-WG was split into AP-WG and Services-WG. Policy-WG might be the way forward. There is a IPv6-WG for IPv6 policy, Routing- WG could do AS topics .. Services WG for NCC Service related topics .. All we need is a Policy WG ??

Or a different charter for AP-WG By aligning the charter for AP-WG to limit discussions and new policies only to current and future protocols and number resources.

Current Charter for AP-WG ? https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum/address-policy- wg/PFBpbmUuTE5YLjQuMzMuMDMwODExMjA0NjI0MC4zMDkyMS0xMDAwMDBAaS5kb250Lm5vPg== The Address Policy WG develops policies relating to the management and registration of Internet number resources (currently IPv4, IPv6 and AS Numbers) by the RIPE NCC and its LIRs within the RIPE NCC service region. It also co-ordinates policies with the other RIR communities and liaises with the IANA and ICANN on address policy issues. The Address Policy WG meets three times a year at RIPE meetings and has an open (publicly archived) mailing list. Anyone with an interest in Internet numbering issues is welcome to observe, participate and contribute to the WG.

Current Charter for AP-WG ? https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum/address-policy- wg/PFBpbmUuTE5YLjQuMzMuMDMwODExMjA0NjI0MC4zMDkyMS0xMDAwMDBAaS5kb250Lm5vPg== The Address Policy WG develops policies relating to the management and registration of Internet number resources (currently IPv4, IPv6 and AS Numbers) by the RIPE NCC and its LIRs within the RIPE NCC service region. It also co-ordinates policies with the other RIR communities and liaises with the IANA and ICANN on address policy issues. The Address Policy WG meets three times a year at RIPE meetings and has an open (publicly archived) mailing list. Anyone with an interest in Internet numbering issues is welcome to observe, participate and contribute to the WG.

Do we need different governance ? A stronger role for the chairs perhaps with a WG Council that will pre-select policy proposals before they are submitted to the ML. The majority of the ML chats are ping/pong-ing between only 2 or 3 people. Not clearly policy related or on-topic to the policy at hand. Or re- hashing a re-hash of a re-hash .. Is the mailinglist the best way for these chats ?

Why ? Nobody needs a re-run of another policy of Remco about the final /8 scraps ..

And now ? The microphone is open … <raise your hand, press the button> Let us know how to proceed.