AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 26 APR 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OData Technical Committee Kick-off July 26, 2012.
Advertisements

Integrating information towards Digital ATM Information Structures - AIXM - Presented By: Eduard Porosnicu, Eurocontrol Date:August 27, 2013.
AIRM Review Forum #2 Monday 12 th September 2011 Eurocontrol, Brussels Welcome by Joe Gorman, NATMIG/SINTEF, Norway CCB Chairman 1.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation OGC Aviation DWG - Bonn Hubert LEPORI EUROCONTROL – DSR/CMN/IM 01-March-2011.
AIXM XML Schema aspects. Copyright EUROCONTROL 2011 AIXM 5 – Design Objectives Capabilities Extensibility Flexible Exchange Flexible Messages Static and.
05 October 2010 HMA-FO Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service HMA Follow On Activities Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service (Sensor Planning Service) Monthly.
Chapter 25 – Configuration Management 1Chapter 25 Configuration management.
Transmitted by the expert
HMA Follow On Activities
5-7 DEC 2016, EUROCONTROL HQ, Brussels
AIXM 5.1 – Metadata AIXM CCB – Webex 18 JULY 2017.
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
CTI STIX SC Monthly Meeting
19th GRI Coordination Group meeting
AIXM – Work in Progress AIXM CCB – Webex, 24 JAN 2014.
Digital AIM Training - AIXM
Messaging support FIXM 4.0 Guidance Materials
AIS AIM SG Ad-hoc Chapters 5-6 Group
AIXM – Work in Progress AIXM CCB – Webex, 07 FEB 2014.
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC
FIXM – GUFI Manfred Beckmann (SOLITEC)
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Chapter 6 Sub-Group ICAO Headquarters, November 2013
Review of the 1958 Agreement
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 20 nov 2017.
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 09 MaY 2017.
Transmitted by the expert
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
Technical Report Writing
LAMAS Working Group June 2017
AIXM 5 Overview xNOTAM Workshop #2 Brussels, November 2007
AIXM 5 Development Status
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
AIXM CCB meeting EUROCONTROL HQ, Brussels
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 26 July 2018.
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 26 June 2018.
WP 4 - Revision of Natura 2000 dataflow
Supplementary Projects (SPs) Current Status
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
DSC Governance Sub Group Recommendations
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
Status report of TF-CS/OTA
ESB Networks AIP Programme Update to IGG, June 22nd 2006
Common Understanding Way forward
Eddy Porosnicu EUROCONTROL
Review of the 1958 Agreement
30 NOV – 01 DEC 2017, Eurocontrol, Brussels
Digital AIM Training - AIXM
Item 4.2 – Towards the 2016 AES Philippe Lombardo Eurostat-F5
AIXM CCB – Webex 24 January 2017
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
9th meeting of the Expert Group on Reporting (22 March 2011)
Eddy Porosnicu EUROCONTROL
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
Editing Board Meeting Status Expert Groups (Transmission, Axle)
Semantic Model Working Group
AIXM 5.2 – CP in Lot 2 AIXM CCB – Brussels, 06 MAR 2019.
AIXM scripts and plannning
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 29 March 2017.
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
AIXM – Work in Progress AIXM CCB – Webex, 14 MAR 2014.
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 10 OCT 2017.
AIXM CCB – Webex 28 FEBRUARY 2017
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
Presentation transcript:

AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 26 APR 2018

Proposed Agenda AIXM 5.2 WIP Temporality Concept Next webex / meetings Recent issues raised/commented in JIRA Progress on drafting the Change Proposals for AIXM 5.2 Issues related to the Procedures model Temporality Concept Revision 1.1 – status and way forward Next webex / meetings AOB

JIRA New issues / recent comments AIXM-302, AIXM-303, AIXM-304 AIXM-213, AIXM-238, AIXM-272 (proposed to move forward) AIXM-246

First set of Change Proposals Action - start using Labels for issues Done for topics AirportHeliport, Aerial Refuelling, Aircraft and Flight Labels used: awaiting_more_comments – when there is no consensus yet on the issue or on the solution ready_for_CP – when there is consensus on a possible solution, but nobody has yet volunteered to draft the CP CP_draft_in_progress - when the CP template is available in Google Docs and someone has volunteered to draft it on_hold – when the latest decision was to wait for external input or action To be continued… Templates in GoogleDocs Target -> first set of change proposals to be ready for review by end April May 2018 Volunteers needed! Approval process to be started before immediately after June meeting

JIRA ISSUES Continue discussion… Procedures model related issues

[AIXM-1xx] TeMPORALITY Concept Version 1.1 – working draft available in GoogleDocs (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lBWtVYKFgphlj3lnHmB2itfZTLQDhhGPFNpRZKGq5so) Part of AIXM 5.1.1 Just clarifications, no significant changes No direct impact on the AIXM 5.1.1 UML or Schema solve AIXM-153, AIXM-154 Remaining actions (for Eddy) Add more non-nominal use cases in chapter 5 (such as postpone a future change, abandon a new feature creation, etc.) Finalise validation rules - done SBVR formulation will be included in the AIXM Business Rules, not in the document itself Final editorial work - done Open suggestions for adding/correcting text/graphics in various places Review the language style (use ‘shall’/’should’/’may’ for the rules.

temporality Discussion during Webex Urgent - Reference implementation to be used for testing new systems (in particular related to the AIP data set) The Donlon sample for the AIP data set should have a test suite, for several consecutive AIRAC cycles. Could also be done with a sub-set, so that we do not link this to the completeness of the Donlon sample Another issue – that version 1.0 leaves room for interpretation, for example allows both PERMDELTA and BASELINE for change notification Consequence – most systems have their own interpretation. A test suite would make most existing implementation incompliant Solution -> focus on the AIP data set

Temporality AIRM introduces the concept of “last revision (date/time)” Can this be an alternative mechanism instead of sequenceNumber/correctionNumber? Does it cover all AIS use cases (see chapter 5). To be discussed using JIRA for AIXM 5.2, if still considered as an option… To do add missing examples in chapter 4 and 5 See other open comments To be discussed for AIXM 5.2 ? As part of the AIXM 5.1.1 revision

Temporality Version 1.2 If any of the Temporality-related issues from JIRA result in changes that have an impact on the temporality concept

Next webex / meetings Webex proposed Meeting in Brussels THU 24 May 14:30 Agenda: Progress on CP drafting Other remaining/additional JIRA issues Meeting in Brussels 6-7-8 June, Eurocontrol Please confirm participation before 31st May