Delivering Data Futures at Edinburgh – Project Structure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SB 203 Overview Workforce Creation and Adult Education Transition Council July 29, 2008.
Advertisements

Action Programmes KAG / HoPS / PAD Workshop 3 rd March 2014.
Re-engineering your approach to the beginning college experience should include an acknowledgement of what is working well and only needs to be maintained,
ASsessment and Results Interface
Halton Housing Trust Customer Scrutiny Panel An introduction to our Service Reviews.
Brief introduction to Primary Care (GP) SOAR users Last updated: 24 th August 2012.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
1 Part 5 Investing for Fun. 2 Task B The team of investment consultants for which you are working for intends to launch a new product, a managed portfolio.
COSFORMS ACADEMIC REGISTRY COSFORMS ARE Clare Goodwin Tina Morse Emma Watts.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT FORMS OF ASSESSMENT.
RE-ACCREDITATION 2009 Procedures, Processes and Timeframes Tamara Bezuidenhout Project Manager: Accreditation 06 August 2008.
Responding to Inspection Findings
USC Health and Safety Supervisor Training November 24 th and 25 th, 2011 Health & Safety Refresher PART 3.
David Lamoureux CalPERS Deputy Chief Actuary
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
Mentor Update, (2008) – Extended Version. Content includes: B71 / B73 SPL Supporting Practice Learning Module, Continuity of Practice Assessment Record,
Employability Programmes (Looking Forward) Heather Davidson Senior Youth Engagement and Employment Manager Ian Raybould Senior Manager,
New Identity Theft Rules Rodney J. Petersen, J.D. Government Relations Officer Security Task Force Coordinator EDUCAUSE.
Cost Of Service Fee Analysis Finance Department November 8, 2010 Michelle Mitchell, Director.
Project management Topic 1 Project management principles.
PNISG Update June Xoserve’s UKLP Assessment Principles 1.Maintain current delivery plans where possible and appropriate e.g. don’t just push all.
PROCEDURES FOR PROVIDERS AFTER INSETA ACCREDITATION/SCOPE IS AWARDED.
Project Management Risk and Quality.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
NYAS Independent Visitors’ Services
SchoolSuccess for Coordinators
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
Department of Higher Education and Training
Presenter: Igna Visser Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2015
BTEC Staff Development 2010
Software Configuration Management
Workplace Projects.
Katy Calvin Thomas.
Articulation Additional Places Insert image here.
Bid Process.
Board and Committee Decision and Discussion to end 2016
New SEN Funding Arrangements 13/14
Transportation Impact Fee Study
Government Spending to Achieve Sustainable Development Policy Goals
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Labour
Identify hazards to the force
Project Roles and Responsibilities
Strawman Best Practice IIA Change Forum June 2017
Apprenticeship: Safety, Health & Environment Technician
PRIDe in Gas Model workshop
Tracking Circuit Boards
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
Study leave Heman Pathmanandam Ian Barton Associate Dean Deputy Dean.
Feedback on verification exercise for proposed leading practice of supplements to a mine Hearing Conservation Programme that include the use of OAEs, coaching.
LO4 - Be Able to Update Websites to Meet Business Needs
Overall Project RAG Status
Wiltshire CIL User led organisation run by and for disabled people* covering the whole of Wiltshire Contracted by Wilts Council since 2012 to provide.
CORPORATE & ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
XRN4361 – UK Link Release 2 - Delivery
XRN4361 – UK Link Release 2 - Delivery
Quality Impact Assessment Unscheduled Care Group Board 25 October 2018
The Imaginist Framework for Benefits Realisation
XRN4361 – UK Link Release 2 - Delivery
Preparing for KIS 2014 entry in August 2013
XRN4361 – UK Link Release 2 - Delivery
Department of Higher Education and Training
Statutory induction briefing
Data Futures curriculum consultation
XRN4361 – UK Link Release 2 - Delivery
Statutory induction briefing for supply agencies
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC
Presentation transcript:

Delivering Data Futures at Edinburgh – Project Structure Project Board Manages risks and resources Prioritises tasks for delivery Makes decisions re. policy changes / escalation as appropriate Working Group Oversees work of task and finish groups Recommends actions to the Project Board Task & Finish Group Systems Analysis Systems Development Ensuring that Edinburgh is able to meet Data Futures requirements presents challenges in terms of systems development and in terms of policy and adapting existing ways of working. The project has different streams that reflect this: Systems analysis and systems development will identify and implement the necessary changes to the Student Records System (SITS) and assess the impact on other systems Business process / policy changes will be addressed by Task and Finish Groups that are co-ordinated by the Working Group. In the first phase these are addressing known issues that do not require systems development As the project progresses these work streams will inform each other Investigate specific issues e.g. managing PhD Supervision records

Additional analysis / development Process reviews Additional analysis / development Initial analysis System development HESA 18/19 (old) HESA 19/20 (Data Futures) Ref. 1 Ref. 2 Ref. 3 Mandatory test In Year Data Futures Data Futures Delivery

In-year Returns: Continuous data supply and correction Current process Data returned for full Academic Year (Aug – Jul) Data quality checking period and sign off (Aug – Oct) In-year Returns: Continuous data supply and correction A S O N D J F M A M J J A S Reference period 1 Reference period 2 End of Reference period Sign off period Data sent to statutory customers Reference period 3 Data Futures creates a continuous database for the student record. Data are updated within each reference period to show where there have been changes e.g. adding new students, changes to programme of study or course choices. Records are timestamped so the date from which a change took place are included in the database. There is not a long data quality checking period and data will be shared with statutory customers at the end of each reference period. Once data has been signed off it is fixed. Changes to historic data will be treated in a similar way to ‘Fixed Database Return’ in the current system i.e. changes will need to be approved by the funding council and institutions will need to pay a fee (currently £7,000). This means that the Student Records System will need to be kept up to date in as close to real time as possible e.g. should a PhD student move to writing up at the end of November this will need to be captured and returned before the end of the reference period.