Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde All authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. R. Khoramnia, J. P. Salgado, C.P.
Advertisements

IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count by Manual and Automated Methods in Normal Corneas and in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Somasheila I Murthy, Debarun.
A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology,
Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.
Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.
Eugene Ng, Arthur B. Cummings, Patrick P. Collins, Alexander V. Goncharov, Diana Bogusevschi, Chris Dainty, Michael C. Mrochen. The authors of this paper.
Purpose We studied the interdevice agreement of three systems in the different measurements of the corneal and anterior segment biometric parameters. The.
IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.
Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.
David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD
A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.
Evaluation of Corneal Parameters and Spherical Aberration After DSAEK Measured with Pentacam System Orkun Muftuoglu, Pawan Prasher, R. Wayne Bowman, Steven.
Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.
TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.
Evaluation of Interface Reflectivity and Corneal Aberrations following DSAEK Hamid Khakshoor, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Mashhad University of Medical.
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master
Reanalysis of Refractive Growth in Pediatric Aphakia and Pseudophakia Susan Whitmer, MD 1 Aurora Xu 2 Scott McClatchey, MD 1,3,4 1 Naval Medical Center.
Seyed Javad Hashemian MD Eye Research Center Rasoul Akram Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences No financial interest
The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster Yinfei Xu, Peter S. Hersh, MD, David S. Chu, MD Institutional Affiliations.
Oliver Findl 1,2, Nino Hirnschall 1,2, Alja Crnej 2 1 VIROS Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria 2 Moorfields.
Paul “Butch” Harton, MD Harbin Clinic Eye Center Rome, GA USA ASCRS Boston Poster, 2010 The Author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
Evaluation of refractive error measurements obtained by three different aberrometers Radha Ram, BA Li Wang, MD, PhD Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS Disclosure:
Phoebe D. Lenhart, M.D. 1, Amy K. Hutchinson, M.D. 1, Michael J. Lynn, M.S. 2, Scott R. Lambert M.D. 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University,
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,
Naomi R. Goldberg, MD PhD Kenneth J. Wolf, MD Eric J. Wolf, MD FACS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Comparison.
Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD
Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.
IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.
COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.
Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.
Evaluating Post Laser Refractive Surgery Corneal Thickness Using Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Arc-Scanning Ultrasonography Versus Pentacam * † Sharon.
Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.
1. Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology
Anterior Segment OCT in Strabismus
Epidemiology and refractive determination of astigmatism at near sight
Characteristics of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure at the First Visit Won Hyuk Oh1, Bum Gi Kim1, Joo Hwa Lee2.
Measurement of 60 kHz Femtosecond LASIK Flaps with Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography & Ultrasonic Subtraction Pachymetry Edward E. Manche, MD.
Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery
From: Key Developments for Partial Coherence Biometry and Optical Coherence Tomography in the Human Eye Made in Vienna Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;57(9):OCT460-OCT474.
Maria A Henriquez MD Luis Izquierdo MD Jackeline Parraga MD
Optical Coherence Tomography
Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.
Comparison of Single-Scheimpflug and Dual-Scheimpflug Pachymetry Measurements and Effect of Decentration World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010.
Aug 11, 2017 Comparison of predictive accuracy on Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and swpt-source optical coherence tomographry (SS-OCT) Choun-Ki.
Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.
Hôpital Ophtalmique Universitaire
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness measured by
Johnson CH TAN, MBBS, MRCSEd(Ophthalmology)
Mehdi Ghajarnia, MD Mark Mifflin, MD John A. Moran Eye Center
Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices
Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
Vicente J. Correa-Gomez MD, Guillermo Tapia MD, Oscar Macias Manuel MD, Alejandro Navas Perez MD, Gilberto Islas MD, Tito Ramírez-Luquin MD, Enrique O.
Yumiko Ban,1,2,3) Seika Den,2) Jun Shimazaki,2,3)
Roxana Ursea, MD Matthew T. Feng, MD Ovette Villavicencio, PhD
Sun Woong Kim, M.D.1, Hae Jung Sun, M.D.1,
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Dr Ciara Bergin, PhD Dr Ivo Guber, Dr Kate Hashemi, Dr Francois Majo
Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,
Bernilla E; Izquierdo Jr. L; Miranda M.
Joshua C. Teichman, MD Richard Lee, MD Andrea Butler, BSc
The Effect of Corneal Thickness on Ocular Drug Penetration
International Vision Correction Research Centre
Presentation transcript:

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements between Partial Coherent Interferometry and Scheimpflug Imaging Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster

Introduction Accurate and reliable determination of anterior segment biometry is important in laser and lens refractive surgery Central Corneal Thickness Anterior Chamber Depth Indicator for corneal metabolism and hydration status Important parameter in characterization of corneal disease Basic parameter in the planning of laser refractive surgery Determine the actual position of the lens. Assessment of accommodation-induced configuration changes of the phakic eye Useful parameter in the planning of lens refractive surgery Ultrasound pachymetry has been the traditional “gold standard” for biometry measurement. However, the are newer non-contact optical technologies available. Biometric Technology Slit scanning Anterior Segment OCT Partial Coherent Interferometry Scheimpflug Imaging We sought to evaluate the comparability of different non-contact methods for the analysis of the central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth in the phakic eye

Partial Coherent Interferometry Purpose Central Corneal Thickness The study is to compare two different non-contact In measuring Partial Coherent Interferometry Short coherence infrared beam is emitted by luminescent diode. Using Michelson interferometer, the beam is separated into two partial rays with different optical paths length These partial rays are reflected onto different intraocular structures. The path difference between the partial rays is recorded when interference signal occurs and smaller than coherence length Anterior Chamber Depth Scheimpflug Imaging Sectional image were measured and recorded CCD camera rotates and provides section planes from three spatial planes The measured data obtained are used to calculate a 3D model from which the thickness and the anterior chamber depth can be computed Methods Strategy Subjects Tools Measurements Cross sectional Prospective 108 healthy eyes 54 subjects aged 20-25 years old IIUM Eye Specialist Clinic Kuantan Pahang. Partial coherent Interferometry Scheimpflug Imaging Central Corneal Thickness Anterior Chamber Depth

Result PCI and SI The mean difference and SD of CCT were -18.63µm+5.76. There was a significant difference in CCT measurement between Partial Coherent Interferometry (PCI) and Scheimpflug imaging (SI), t=-33.59 (107), p<0 .05. PCI SI PCI and SI The mean difference and SD of ACD were 0.059mm+0.249. There was a significant difference in the mean ACD between Partial Coherent Interferometry (PCI) and Scheimpflug imaging (SI), t=2.503 (107), p<0.05. PCI SI

Result PCI PCI SI SI In Pearson’s correlation, there was a linear and positive correlation between Partial Coherent Interferometry (PCI) and Scheimpflug Imaging (SI) in both CCT (p<0.05) and ACD measurement (p<0.05). The observed r in CCT measurement was (0.978) suggests positive and strong correlation. The observed r in ACD measurement was (0.399) suggests positive and fair correlation.

Result SI SI SI PCI PCI PCI SI PCI SI In Bland –Altman analysis, a total of 104/108 (96%) Partial Coherent Interferometry-Scheimpflug Imaging differences were within the 95% confidence limits of the mean difference of CCT. A total of 99/108 (92%) Partial Coherent Interferometry-Scheimpflug Imaging differences were within the 95% confidence limits of the mean difference of ACD.

In short….. There was overestimation of CCT by Scheimpflug Imaging from Partial Coherent Interferometry and underestimation of ACD by Partial Coherent Interferometry from Scheimpflug Imaging. The mean difference (95% CI) of CCT was 18.63µm+5.76 with p value <0.05. The mean difference (95% CI) of ACD was 0.059mm+0.249 with p value=0.014. Correlation was high to moderate between Partial Coherent Interferometry and Scheimpflug Imaging (r=0.978, r=0.399) with regard to CCT and ACD, respectively.

Discussion Scheimpflug Imaging (SI) overestimated Partial Coherent Interferometry (PCI) in CCT measurement while PCI overestimated SI in ACD measurement. The overestimation of CCT measurement between these instruments was statistically and clinically significant. The estimation of ACD measurement between these instruments however, is statistically significant but not clinically significant. The comparison between findings in present study and findings in previous studies cannot be made precisely and in quantitatively manner, as different subjects were involved in each study and differences in methodology of study. The discrepancies between the two instruments could be due to the difference in technological principles, optical measuring technique and operating technique.

References Buehl, W., Stojanac, D., Sacu, S., Drexler, W., & Findl, O. (2006).Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 141, 1. Meinhardt, B., Stachs, O., Stave, J., Beck, R., & Guthoff, R. (2006). Evaluation References of biometric methods for measuring the anterior chamber depth in the non-contact mode. Graefe’s Arch Clinical Experimental Ophthalmology, 244, 559-564. Wolffsohn, J. S., & Peterson, R. C. (2006). Anterior ophthalmic imaging. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 89, 4, 205-214. Wolffsohn, J. S., & Davies, L. N. (2007). Advances in anterior segment imaging. Current Opinion in ophthalmology, 18, 32-38. Konstantopoulos, A., Hossain, P., & Anderson, D. F. (2007). Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis?. British Journal Ophthalmol, 91, 551-557.  Lackner, B., Schmidinger, G., Skorpik, C. (2005). Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan. Optometry and Vision Science, 82, 9, 858-862.