Lake Intercalibration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
River Fish Intercalibration group Coordination: D. Pont,Cemagref, France) N. Jepsen (JRC Ispra)
Advertisements

Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Lake Intercalibration: status of ongoing work Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT meeting – Ispra (IT), July of 14 CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration.
National typologies - reports Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
25 oktober nd phase intercalibration CBGIG Macrophytes Rob Portielje.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
Lakes Intercalibration Results - July 2006 Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Lake Intercalibration Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
IC Guidance Annex III: Reference conditions and alternative benchmarks Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Intercalibration Progress Coast GIGs JRC, Ispra, Italy, March 2005 Dave Jowett, Environment Agency (England and Wales), Coast.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration CB GIG River Macroinvertebrates Final Report ECOSTAT June 2011 Isabel Pardo Roger Owen.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 2 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
GIG plan updates GIG leads were requested to update their work plans
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
ECOSTAT, Bristol Hotel, Brussels,
Intercalibration results 2006/2007
Intercalibration Results 2006
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
Intercalibration in transitional waters (TW) Phase 2: Milestone 4 Reports (M4R) Presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A ECOSTAT River GIG results Wouter van de Bund Vaida Olsauskyte Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
CW-TW Intercalibration results
CW-TW Intercalibration work progress
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
Results of the Coastal and Transitional Waters Metadata Analysis
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Draft Commission Decision on Intercalibration
River GIGs: Checking and completing the Decision Annex Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Lakes - Central GIG progress report July 2004
Lake Intercalibration
Working Group A ECOSTAT Summary Milestone Reports: River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Status Overview
Lake Macroinvertebrate IC EC-GIG
Nutrient Standards: Proposals for further work
Working Group A ECOSTAT Update on intercalibration Prepared by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Fish Intercalibration group ( )
Textile. Clothing. Leather. Shoes.
CW-TW IC Work progress Fuensanta Salas Herrero, CW-TW IC Coordinator
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, October 2005
IC remaining gaps: overview and way forward
Rivers X-GIG phytobenthos intercalibration
River groups with extension
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
River Fish Intercalibration group D. Pont,Cemagref, France)
Reporting template for milestone reports
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
Baltic Sea GIG Status April 2009
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
WG A Ecological Status Intercalibration: Where do we go from here ?
Intercalibration of very large rivers in Europe
NORTH EAST ATLANTIC GIG
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Baltic Sea GIG Status Ecostat 23 April 2013
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Lake Intercalibration Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability

Lake GIGs Central Baltic Fish East Cont Mediterranean Fish Phytoplankton Macrophytes Benthic invertebrates Mediterranean Fish

Central Baltic Fish Lead by Germany (Almost) all MS participate: BE-F, CZ, DE, DK, EE, FR, LT, NL, PL LV - started to participate CZ – participating unofficially ? UK plan to adopt the Irish / Dutch fish classification tool (eDNA method is planned in future)

Central Baltic Fish different sampling / metrics Solution – TAPI index = pressure index Will be used as Common Metrics

Central Baltic Fish Review : Questions on MS assessment Asking more detailed reporting GIG plans: TAPI finalization - Dec 2014 Next meeting - January 2014 IC finalization – May 2015

Eastern Continental RO and HU Phytoplankton, macrophytes, benthic fauna Results-Review-Response-Plans

Eastern Continental Phytoplankton Results: RO and HU Phytoplankton assessment methods Eutrophication Direct comparison

Eastern Continental Phytoplankton Review: Reference sites / benchmark sites Setting Reference conditions Suggestions for improving RO method

Eastern Continental Phytoplanton Response to Review: Thorough and objective review Work on reference /benchmark sites Improving RO method Results: December 2015

Eastern Continental Macrophytes Results: RO and HU Common assessment method eutrophication and degradation Intercalibration “Option 1”

Eastern Continental Macrophytes Review: Reference conditions/sites Boundary setting Suggestions for improving method

Eastern Continental Macrophytes Response to Review: Detailed answers Refining ref condition setting Refining the macrophyte methods Results: May 2015

Eastern Continental Benthic fauna Results: RO and HU Benthic invertebrate assessment methods Nutrients, organic load+other Direct comparison

Eastern Continental Benthic fauna Review: Reference sites / benchmark sites Not finalised pressure-response relationships

Eastern Continental Benthic fauna Response to Review: finalising pressure-response relationships to check and clarify RC and boundary setting Results: April 2015

Eastern Continental Three GIGs – work is going on: Romania and Hungary

Eastern Continental Common problems: We used ref sites to set ref cond Reference sites / conditions Benchmark sites Do we have reference sites ? We don’t have any We used ref sites to set ref cond

Eastern Continental Collaboration necessary ! Review points for all GIGs - similar GIGs have to work more together Compare and discuss views Common understanding

Mediterranean Fish Natural lakes: Italy, France - assessment methods No IC common type - IC not possible

Mediterranean Fish Reservoirs: Italy, France, Romania - assessment methods under development IC possible in the near future

Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs

Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs: to exclude fish BQE from ecological assesment

Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs To exclude some BQE ? Arguments No response to pressures High natural variability Agreement within GIG Review panel opinion

Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs: to exclude fish BQE from ecological assesment Low taxa richess Redundant with phytoplankton Mostly alien species Expensive sampling

Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs: to exclude fish BQE from ecological assesment Med GIG opinion Review 1 WISER project Review 2

Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs: to exclude fish BQE from ecological assesment Med GIG Opinion: disagree Review 1: partial agreement, more studies needed WISER Project: disagree Review 2: disagree

to different pressures Alien species can be used Spain – Fish – lakes and reservoirs: to exclude fish BQE from ecological assesment Low number of species is not an obstacle Low taxa richess Fish respond to different pressures Redundant with phytoplankton Alien species can be used to assess pressures Mostly alien species Hydroacoustics Expensive sampling

Mediterranean Fish GIG Discussion/agreements necessary ! Within Mediterranean GIG: France, Italy Within Spain Scientific projects going on

Summary CB Fish – results 2015 Necessary MS active contributions LV – assessment method ? CZ – to clarify the situation GIG leader support

Summary East Cont – results 2015 Achievable if MS active contribution GIG leaders supported + collaboration between EastCont GIGs