Shenandoah County Public Transit Feasibility Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fta circular background PIERCE TRANSIT’S NEW TITLE VI POLICIES Jay Peterson Senior Manager, Transit Development 1.
Advertisements

WELCOME Panhandle Independent Living Center’s Travel Training Partnership.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
TPB Human Service Transportation Coordination Program 1 Key Elements of the Update to the Coordinated Human Service Transportation Plan Human Service Transportation.
Overview of JARC & New Freedom Projects, FY 2013 HSTC Task Force Meeting February 20,2014 Lynn Winchell-Mendy Transportation Planner National Capital Region.
Urban Transportation Planning. Land Use - Transportation Cycle.
Transportation Development How do we get rubber on the road? …..and other burning questions.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Transportation & Aging Senior and Disabled Riders Transportation Summit December 6, 2013.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Public Transit in the Lowcountry and the Bus Livability Grant MTAP/SCOPTSavannah December 7, 2010.
May 30, 2008 Community Integration Commission 1 DRPT Initiatives on Transportation Services For Older Adults, People With Disabilities.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
Valley Transit Fixed Route and ADA Paratransit Transportation.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Eastside Transit Alternatives Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013 Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013.
Region X Local Human Service Transit Coordination Plan Public Workshop RDC Title Date Location Insert transit photo from your community here.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Ride in Kane Paratransit Service Kane County. Ride in Kane was established in 2008 through the efforts of the Kane County Paratransit Coordinating Counsel.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Transit is Smart Growth Matt Ryan Coconino County Supervisor Chair, NAIPTA April 24, 2012 Arizona Transit Association Annual Conference.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
Keeping Harris County Moving A Coordinated Approach.
ITS Coordination Tools: Perspectives from a Rural California Region Pam Couch, Executive Director Modoc Transportation - Alturas, CA
Transportation for Everyone Community Transportation for the Contoocook River Valley February 2007 Posted 2/14/07.
City of Olathe Taxi Coupon Voucher Program. Creation of Program – Now and Then Seniors verbalized need for affordable, dependable and safe transportation.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
1 HSRC EPWP SEMINAR 07 JUNE 2016 Presentation by Lulu Mdletshe EPWP Co-ordinator: Department of Transport.
Prepared for the Milford Board of Selectman May 9, 2016.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
IS NOW. . . The Center for Mobility Equity.
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Presented by: RLS & Associates, Inc.
Course Introduction: Session 1
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Central Maryland Transit Development Plan
Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #1
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Affordable Fares Connecting to Opportunity in the Denver metro region
Mobility Choice Blueprint
and Transportation Impacts
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
South Central Massachusetts Elderbus
Measuring and capturing mind share
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update
Innovative Fare Programs for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
LESAR DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Fta circular background
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
Where’s My Ride William Tsuei Director of IT.
INNOVATIVE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES
April 23, 2018.
National Center for Mobility Management Webinar May 10, 2018
Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program
Making the Community Accessible for All
Re-Thinking Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities
Mobility Management in Sacramento:
Analysis and Mapping of Transportation Needs in Haliburton County
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Brunswick County CCP Raw Survey Results
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Shenandoah County Public Transit Feasibility Study Briefing to County Supervisors draft December 12, 2018

Background Area non-profit agencies identified that the lack of transportation is a barrier for people to access services, jobs, medical appointments, and educational opportunities. Major employers have indicated that hiring and retaining entry level employees is a challenge due to limited transportation resources. Shenandoah County Chamber reached out to the Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission (NSVRC) for technical assistance.

Background NSVRC applied for and was awarded a grant from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) to study the feasibility of initiating public transportation service. Through an RFP process, KFH Group was hired to lead the study. The study was initiated in September, 2018.

Study Tasks Outreach to Stakeholder Groups and the Public Review of Socioeconomic Data and Local Planning Documents System and Service Development Budget and Performance Development System Governance and Management Draft and Final Reports

Stakeholder Input : Sept.– Nov. 2018 Human Service Agencies Public transit is needed to help residents access jobs, medical appointments, school, training, shopping, and other life activities. Primary focus should be for job access and for seniors and people with disabilities to access daily life activities. Highest priority is the U.S. Route 11 Corridor, M-F. A mobility management component should be included. Public transit seen as an important economic development resource. There are implementation concerns with regard to garnering public support, the institutional structure, and effective marketing.

Stakeholder Input: Sept.– Nov. 2018 Employers Employer survey – 26 employers responded, representing 3,305 employees. Nine reported that their employees have said transportation to work is a problem for them. Nine reported that transportation to work is an issue in hiring and retaining employees. Employees’ transportation problems are typically a result of carpool arrangements that fall through, affecting more than one employee (20% mode share for carpooling). Seven employers offered specific suggestions, with three suggesting service along U.S. Route 11.

Stakeholder Input: Sept.– Nov. 2018 Public Survey 1,100 responses Majority drive themselves and do not face transportation barriers. 65% of the total indicated that there is a need to start a public transit program, with a focus on work trips and local service geared to appointments and daily life activities. 342 people said they would use it. Favored Service: U.S. Route 11 Corridor M-F, between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Fixed route Between $1.00 and $2.00 fare

Stakeholder Input: Sept.– Nov. 2018 Public Survey 270 Comments 195 positive 54 negative 21 neutral

Stakeholder Input: Sept.– Nov. 2018 Public Survey – Comments (Sample) “I have a disability and this would make a world of difference in my quality of life” “I would definitely use this form of transportation to get back and forth to work. Yes this town does have a local taxi service, which is a great and friendly business, but for five days a week to go to and from work the taxi costs me $80 a week and I live just over 2 miles from my work. That gets extremely expensive… Please help bring public transportation to Woodstock. This would help my family put food on the table and save to get a car of my own.” “I think this would be a fantastic resource – to alleviate the stressors of the working poor, to meet the needs of the elderly, and to provide young people with a safe alternative to driving. I would be very willing for my tax dollars to go to such a program.” “There is no need for public transportation in Shenandoah County. A waste of money.” “Shenandoah County is too spread out for public transportation. The tax payer dollars that this would require are better used in other areas.”

Demographics and Land Use Analysis

Demographics and Land Use Analysis

Demographics and Land Use Analysis

Demographics and Land Use Analysis

Demographics and Land Use Analysis High need areas, as well as population and major origins and destinations are generally clustered along U.S. Route 11 Corridor. Local planning documents support the investigation of initiating a public transportation program, as a collaborative effort among county, town, and regional partner.

Next Steps: Dec. 2018 – Feb. 2019 System and Service Development Look at peer systems Outline potential options Budget and Performance Development Develop cost estimates Develop ridership estimates Estimate fare revenue, grant options, and local match requirements. There is the possibility of applying for a demonstration grant from DRPT to initiate service.

Next Steps: Dec. 2018 – Feb. 2019 System Governance and Management County? NSVRC? Local private non-profit? Contractor or in-house? *These last three steps will determine feasibility*

Questions and Contact Information Project Deliverables http://www.kfhgroup.com/nsvrcfeasibilitystudy/ NSVRC Karen Taylor ktaylor@nsvregion.org (540) 636-8800 KFH Group Elisabeth (Lib) Rood, AICP Senior Transportation Planner erood@kfhgroup.com 301-951-8660