Workshop Overview 1. Why assess process?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Classroom Observation and Feedback P erformance Review Staff Development.
Peer assessment and group work event and practical workshop RSC WM Stimulating and supporting innovation in learning.
Rationale To encourage all students to take a full part in the life of our school, college, workplace or wider community. To provide opportunities to enable.
What is Teamwork & Team Building Team work : Concept of people working together as a team. Team Player : A team player is someone who is able to get.
Assessment of Group Work University of Warwick 27/28 March 2003 Cordelia Bryan Project Director
PEARL Personal Employability Achievement and Reflection for Learning PEARL Personal Employability Achievement and Reflection for Learning.
Recording Excellence Nicole Duplain School of Humanities.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Coaching Workshop.
Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching Ginny Saich & Ruth Watkins (DAICE)
Critical Partnerships: Using Peer Support to Develop Skills in Writing at Masters Level Sue Forsythe Maarten Tas School of Education
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
Session Materials  Wiki
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
Mentor Workshop: Assessing Learners Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
Multidisplinary Approach.. What are your expectations Write on board.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Manage People Performance RAF1 Monitoring performance Manage People Performance.
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
2-1 Copyright  2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Office Skills: A Practical Approach 5e by Horsfall and Turner Chapter.
College of Science and Engineering Learning and Teaching Strategy Planning Meeting Initial Reflections Nick Hulton.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Challenge CHALLENGE – EVALUATION – CREATIVITY – CLARITY – FOUNDATIONS – COLLABORATION.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Performance & Development Review System This brief overview of the new Performance and Development Review will serve to introduce you to the reasons why.
Assessment Information Evening 17 th September 2015.
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
Dr. Christine Tom Griffith University School-based Assessment for and in Learning.
What is meant by methodology and why is it important? Methodology refers to the ‘how’ of teaching - how teaching and learning is planned, organized, conducted,
Good teaching for diverse learners
Subject specialist mentoring on the DET
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
Subject specialist teaching
OTLA Report Writing Training
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Team Teaching Action Research
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Evaluating a Task-based English Course: A Proposed Model
COMM-421 Course Specificiations Female Students
Unit 538: Manage domiciliary services
TAA04 TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT PACKAGE
OFSTED and the role of Teaching Assistants
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Coaching.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Metacognition and Self-regulation.
The Role of the EP in the Graduated Response
Reflecting & Evaluating
Pat Talshir Elinor Karsagi
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Getting Started with MMD
NBS8328 International Management Practitioner
OTLA Report Writing Training
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
What is Coaching? Workshop 1.
Gina Wisker University of Brighton
OTLA Report Writing Training
Planning a cross- curricular topic
How inclusive is my module... and yours?
CEng progression through the IOM3
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

Workshop Overview 1. Why assess process? 2. What are we looking for when we assess process ? 3. What are the difficulties in assessing process? 4. What practices address these difficulties? 5. Some principles of assessing process

Why Assess Process ? development of metacognitive skills may enhance performance develops of intellectual awareness assists identification and development of transferable skills rewards 'working out' and exploration rewards learning from experience rewards creative and intellectual contributions rewards development rather than just achievements enables a sense of individual ownership of the work/process. may differentiate individual input within a group project

What are we looking for when we assess process ? (I) effective planning minutes/action plans/proposals time management schedules, log books, monitoring resource management budget records, monitoring investigation or application of theoretical/ intellectual models or taught practice vivas /presentations/ reflective essays

What are we looking for when we assess process ? (II) role skills & protocols (director/actor/technician) supervision, observation, viva, written examination interpersonal skills & team working observation/ logs/ peer assessment problem-solving log books/supervision flexibility observations/vivas, logs self-awareness vivas/logs/reflective essays

Difficulties in assessing process for staff group formation process unseen differentiating individual contribution Identifying which processes we wish to assess distinguishing effort from learning effect of interpersonal relationships between staff and students modes of assessment used to evaluate process may favour different skills over those required for the process (writing over doing) gaps between narratives of process and actual behaviour

Difficulties in assessing process for students group formation differentiating individual contribution ability of students to adapt to potentially new learning techniques/experiences. distinguishing effort from learning effect of interpersonal relationships between students responsibility over the creative process for students may lead to greater insecurity/anxiety. lack of self-awareness

Difficulties in assessing process for institutions group formation through systemic constraints weak evidence base evidence not recoverable open to contest /litigation may not meet all of QAA Assessment principles

What practices address these difficulties? a) training in relevant processes b) planning the process c) assessing implementation d) reflecting on the process

Some principles in assessing process (i) The aim of assessing process should be to enable students to learn from their experience so that they could deal effectively with a similar challenge Assess learning not effort. Distinguish assessment from discipline issues. Ensure the regulatory framework supports your work. We should know what we are looking for when we are assessing process.

Some principles in assessing process (ii) The mode of assessment should provide a valid measure. Students should be trained in processes, particularly if these processes are to be assessed. Formative assessment will aid effective processes, if it is timely. To be effective, feeback should be: timely, focused, and enable the students to take action. Reflection is best seen as an ongoing process on which tutors can provide invaluable feedback

Some things to consider: Why is it important to you to assess process? Are your process criteria medium specific? Are you using one source of evidence for your judgements about a process? Are you rewarding individuals when what you value is group collaboration? Would someone else assess the students at the same level? How does your assessment address student diversity? When do you give feedback to students? Could your students tackle a similar task better?