© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Changes in body composition, energy and water intake
Figure 1. Functional properties of sweet potato flour (SPF), glutinous rice flour (GRF) button mushroom powder (BMP) and composite gluten-free flour fortified.
Overall acceptability
Table 1. Composition of BL agar (pH 7.2)
Steamed black soybeans
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 1. Bread formulation for two kilograms of dough
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 2. Syneresis percentage of sweet potato flour (SPF), glutinous rice flour (GRF) and composite gluten-free flour fortified with BMP and inulin, stored.
Mean in positive samples1 (µg/kg) Highest value found (µg/kg)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
Total Energy Consumed (%)
Table 1. Formulation of gluten-free cake
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Titratable acidity (g/100g)
Table 1. Composition of the diet (g/kg)
Anti-nutrients content Trypsin inhibitor (TIU/g)
Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 5. Sensory evaluation of mayonnaise samples
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 6. Inhibition of Pathogenic Bacteria by honey samples
Table 2. Waste characterization in Port Harcourt, Source [1]
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 9. Functional Properties of Lentil Protein Isolate
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 2. MINERAL COMPOSITION OF OGI (GRUEL) mg/100g SAMPLES
Table 8. Marketing return of foria
Table 1. Characterization Result of Leaded Petrol and Blends
Number of questionnaires sent out
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Average Hardness value (HRC)
Fermentation time (hr)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
Much more than it should
Oil Absorption capacity(g/g)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Solid-liquid ratio (B)
Cashew juice stored for 30 days
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Equation Tem. (°C) Specific heat Thermal conductivity
Ingredients/100g dry sample
Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 1. Recipe formulation for bread production. Source: Modified Islam et al., (2011) SAMPLES INGREDIENTS A B C D E Wheat flour (g) 100 90 80 70 60 maize (g) 5 10 15 20 Sweet potato (g) Salt (g) 2.5 Yeast (g) Fats (g) 2 Sugar (g) Water (ml) 65 6 Igbabul Bibiana et al. Quality Evaluation of Composite Bread Produced from Wheat, Maize and Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Flours. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, 109-115. doi:10.12691/ajfst-2-4-1 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.