Review of clinical trial experience with icodextrin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
Advertisements

Routine Monitoring of Sodium and Phosphorus Removal in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory PD (CAPD), Automated PD (APD)
Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory.
F.H. Bender, J. Bernardini, B. Piraino  Kidney International 
Buffer transport in peritoneal dialysis
Volume 70, Pages S138-S145 (November 2006)
Iron status and iron supplementation in peritoneal dialysis patients
Approach to diagnosis of infective endocarditis
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
End-stage renal disease in developing countries
Role of diuretics in the preservation of residual renal function in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis  James F. Medcalf, Kevin P.G.
Volume 70, Pages S38-S43 (November 2006)
Volume 56, Pages S62-S66 (November 1999)
Use of icodextrin in high transport ultrafiltration failure
Impact of new dialysis solutions on peritonitis rates
Volume 72, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 64, Pages S3-S12 (December 2003)
Incremental peritoneal dialysis: Effects on the choice of dialysis modality, residual renal function and adequacy  G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Barbieri  Kidney.
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Glucose sparing in peritoneal dialysis: Implications and metrics
Ali K. Abu-Alfa, John Burkart, Beth Piraino, Joe Pulliam, Salim Mujais 
Francesco Paolo Schena  Kidney International 
Fluid overload and residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis: the proof of the pudding is in the eating  Wim Van Biesen, Achim Jörres  Kidney International 
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
George A. Kaysen, Burl R. Don
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
French peritoneal dialysis registry (RDPLF): Outline and main results
F.H. Bender, J. Bernardini, B. Piraino  Kidney International 
Severe exfoliative skin rash with icodextrin
Edmund G. Lowrie  Kidney International 
Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Volume 73, Pages S5-S17 (April 2008)
Pharmacokinetics of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis patients
Volume 73, Pages S94-S101 (April 2008)
Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory.
Analysis of fluid transport pathways and their determinants in peritoneal dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure  A. Parikova, W. Smit, D.G. Struijk,
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Microbiology and outcomes of peritonitis in North America
Nephrology in Latin America, with special emphasis on Brazil
Nephrology Crossword: Peritoneal Dialysis
Future of icodextrin as an osmotic agent in peritoneal dialysis
AGEs in foods: Do they play a role in uremia?
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Profiling of peritoneal ultrafiltration
Lynda Anne Szczech, Ira L. Lazar  Kidney International 
Rajnish Mehrotra, Joel D. Kopple, Marsha Wolfson  Kidney International 
Urea kinetic analysis of automated peritoneal dialysis allows calculation of a CAPD- equivalent Kt/Vurea  Scott J. Schurman, Lawrence R. Shoemaker, Bradley.
Volume 73, Pages S72-S75 (April 2008)
Prevalence of dyslipidemic risk factors in hemodialysis and CAPD patients  Florian Kronenberg, Arno Lingenhel, Ulrich Neyer, Karl Lhotta, Paul König, Martin.
Quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients: Decline over time and association with clinical outcomes  Sr. Anne B. Bakewell, Rob M. Higgins, Mair.
Peritoneal dialysis in Mexico
Phosphate binders on iron basis: A new perspective?
Volume 70, Pages S84-S90 (November 2006)
Adequacy of automated peritoneal dialysis with and without manual daytime exchange: A randomized controlled trial  D. Demetriou, A. Habicht, M. Schillinger,
Charles A. Herzog  Kidney International 
Quantification of free water transport in peritoneal dialysis
Renal replacement therapy in Latin America
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Strategies for iron supplementation: Oral versus intravenous
The International Pediatric Peritonitis Registry: Starting to walk
Recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) as anticoagulant in intensive care patients treated with continuous hemodialysis  Karl-Georg Fischer, M.D., Andreas van.
Clinical Practice Recommendations For Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy
E.F. Vonesh, J.J. Snyder, R.N. Foley, A.J. Collins 
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy
Metabolic and laboratory effects of icodextrin
Presentation transcript:

Review of clinical trial experience with icodextrin Marsha Wolfson, Francis Ogrinc, Salim Mujais  Kidney International  Volume 62, Pages S46-S52 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MIDAS Study: Mean ultrafiltration (UF) in 1.5% dextrose-treated patients (○) versus 7.5% icodextrin-treated continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (•) for the 8-hour dwell. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MIDAS Study: Mean UF in 1.5% dextrose-treated patients (○) versus 7.5% icodextrin-treated CAPD patients (•) for the 12-hour dwell. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 North American CAPD Trial: Mean UF in 2.5% dextrose-treated patients (○) versus 7.5% icodextrin-treated patients (•) for the 12 ± 4-hour dwell. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 MIDAS Study: Mean UF in 4.5% dextrose-treated patients (○) versus 7.5% icodextrin-treated CAPD patients (•) for the 8-hour dwell. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 MIDAS Study: Mean UF in 4.25% dextrose-treated patients (○) versus 7.5% icodextrin–treated CAPD patients (•) for the 12-hour dwell. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 MIDAS Study: Percent of CAPD patients with negative net UF for the 8-hour dwell. Symbols are: (□) 1.5% dextrose, (▪) 7.5% icodextrin. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 MIDAS Study: Percent of CAPD patients with negative net UF for the 12–hour dwell. Symbols are: (□) 1.5% dextrose, (▪) 7.5% icodextrin. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 North American CAPD Trial: Percent of patients with negative net UF for the 12 ± 4-hour dwell. Symbols are: (□) 2.5% dextrose, (▪) 7.5% icodextrin. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 MIDAS Study: Percent of CAPD patients with negative net UF for the 8-hour dwell. Symbols are: (□) 4.5% dextrose, (▪) 7.5% icodextrin. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 MIDAS Study: Percent of CAPD patients with negative net UF for the 12-hour dwell. Symbols are: (□) 4.5% dextrose, (▪) 7.5% icodextrin. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 European Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) Trial: Mean UF in 2.5% dextrose-treated patients (○) versus 7.5% icodextrin-treated patients (•) for the 14 ± 2-hour dwell. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 European APD Trial: Percent of patients with negative net UF for the 14 ± 2-hour dwell. Symbols are: (□) 2.5% dextrose; (▪) 7.5% icodextrin. Kidney International 2002 62, S46-S52DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.7.x) Copyright © 2002 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions