Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
Advertisements

Training Module III Speaker notes included. Primer on Special Education in Charter Schools Guidance for Operators Part A Pre-Authorization and Planning.
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.

A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan September 4, 2008 Presented by:Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Guidelines for IDEA Implementation Developed and Presented through Collaborative Efforts RIDE – Office of Special Populations Rhode Island Technical.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
West Virginia Department of Education
Session I Chapters 1-5 Presented by… Lynn Boyer, Ph.D.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
Effective Contract Management Planning
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
1 Transitional Services Certification Minnesota Rules
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
1. 2 The San Jacinto Unified School District presents: Strategic Plan For
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Manifestation Determination Review
World’s Largest Educational Community
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
1 704 KAR 19:002 Revised October KRS (1)(a) - ”Alternative Education” a program that exists to meet the needs of students that cannot be.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Campus Improvement Plans
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
School Site Council Guidelines Roles and Responsibilities Adapted from: Administrator’s Guide to School Site Councils Prepared by California.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Pre-Applicant Training| SC Public Charter School District| Beckie Davis Serving Students with Special Needs.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
Alternative Education Programs
Serving Students with Special Needs
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Updates: Office for Exceptional Children
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Presentation transcript:

Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009

2 Special Education Advisory Panel Federal Regulations/State Code Sections , , and Mississippi Code The State must establish and maintain an advisory panel for the purpose of providing policy guidance with respect to special education and related services for children with disabilities in the State.

3 Special Rule -Membership The majority of the members of the panel must be individuals with disabilities or parents of children with disabilities. The Special Education Advisory Panel met in regular session seven (7) times during the year, with one work session and one orientation meeting for new members.

4 Advisory Panel Recommendations For This self-governed Special Education Advisory Panel has established six standing committees to carry out the responsibilities of the Panel and to accomplish its purpose as stated in the federal law. The six committees are: (a) Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process, (b) Parental Involvement, (c) Professional Development, (d) Legislative, (e) Proposed Policy Implementation, and (f) Transition.

5 I. Continuous Monitoring The focused monitoring teams goal is to utilize information to assist the school districts with improving results for children with disabilities. The following are recommendations for the school year: Recommendation #1: Ensure monitoring efforts around IDEA 2004 compliance include a variety of methods, including on- site visits.

6 I. Continuous Monitoring Recommendation # 2: The MDE Office of Special Education should evaluate procedures relating to how parent focus group meetings are conducted and consider improvements such as: ensuring consistency in how focus group meetings are held, and provide opportunities for parents to comment on the topic of the focused monitoring as well as other local concerns relating to Special Education.

7 II. Parental Involvement The Parental Involvement Committee is comprised of parents and others on the Special Education Advisory Panel who have a sincere interest in the children of this state. Recommendation: Continue to support new and innovative parental outreach strategies.

8 III. Professional Development The Professional Development Committee goal is to ensure that MDE improves pre- service and in-service professional development of all educators in order to identify and address early learning difficulties and to support learners with ongoing exceptional learning needs in both general and special education settings.

9 III. Professional Development Recommendation #1: Prioritize existing scholarship funds (including William Winter Teacher Scholar Loans and Critical Needs Scholarship) for Special Educators pursuing traditional routes to licensure. Recommendation#2: Develop standards for alternate route certification programs that parallel content requirements of traditional programs.

10 III. Professional Development Recommendation#3: Update Standard 6 of the Process and Performance Review for K- 3, K-6, and Secondary Education to include specific, measurable evidence of content and field experience relating to students with disabilities including providing accommodations and modifications in teaching methodology to meet the unique learning and behavioral needs of this population beyond the 3 hours in Special Education currently required.

11 III. Professional Development Recommendation#4: Add specific academic content standards for Special Education to Standard 6 of the Process and Performance Review to include specific, measurable evidence of content relating to subject area preparation (reading, mathematics, science and social studies), behavior management, classroom management, assessment and progress monitoring, as well as disability-specific information.

12 III. Professional Development Recommendation#5: The Mississippi Department of Education should ensure that disability experts and advocates are included on all groups working toward setting standards and requirements for teacher licensure, both general and special education; alternate route and traditional routes.

13 IV. Legislative Committee Recommendation #1: Reintroduce proposed legislation allowing students with disabilities to be educated through the age of 21. Recommendation #2 : The State Special Education Advisory Panel will continue to ask the State Board of Education to support full funding for all special education teacher units at 100 percent.

14 V. Policy Implementation The purpose of this committee is to review and make recommendations regarding the proposed policies. The Special Education Advisory Panel submitted written comments during the public comment period.

15 V. Policy Implementation Recommendation #1: Replace the term mental retardation throughout the draft policies with the more acceptable term intellectual disability. Change Approved By SBE: Mental Retardation (MR) (also referred to as Intellectual Disability by some entities) means significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental period that adversely affects a childs educational performance. Recommendation #2: Training should continue with regard to implementation of procedures aligned with State Board Policy 4300 (TST).

16 VI. Transition The purpose of the Transition Committee is to research and recommend strategies that will improve transition for students receiving special education services in the state.

17 VI. Transition Recommendation #1: MDE should continue to sponsor interagency transition conferences throughout the state. Recommendation #2: When possible, transition conferences should be regional to assist school district personnel and parents with travel costs.

18 VI. Transition Recommendation #3: MDE should provide technical assistance in collaboration with other appropriate agencies to ensure that school districts and agencies have formulated agreements and are implementing agreements relevant to transition. Recommendation #4: MDE should continue to provide funding for training and technical assistance efforts on transition.

19 VI. Transition Recommendation #5: MDE should fully fund a transition coordinator for each district. Recommendation #6: MDE/OSE should continue to review effective practice models and provide current relevant information when providing technical assistance and training to school district personnel, early intervention staff, and staff of programs providing employment opportunities and life skills training.

20 VI. Transition Recommendation #7: The MDEs Office of Special Education should provide information on effective practices for transition models via a variety of methods and formats (including on the MDE website) and, upon request, provide technical assistance at the local level. Recommendation #8: Continue to monitor disaggregated drop out rates for students with disabilities.

21 VI. Transition Recommendation #9: The MDE should meet with the State Board for Community and Junior Colleges to begin the process of developing an Articulation Agreement for admission of students with the MS Occupational Diploma throughout the state. Recommendation #10: MDEs IEP procedures should require that parents and students are notified of post-secondary education entrance requirements during the transition process.