Tom Peterson, Fermilab 6 December 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WG D: HOM Couplers and Loads Summary G. Burt & J. Delayen.
Advertisements

Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Cryomodule Helium Volumes Tom Peterson, Fermilab AWLC14 13 May 2014.
Superconducting Spoke Resonator Cavities and Cryomodules
Cryomodule Concepts & Cryogenics J.D. Fuerst SPX Technical Study Group Meeting 27-29JUL10.
Possible Assembly and Test of the Crab cryomodule in SM18 at CERN P. Maesen LHC Crab Cav meeting, 17 Sep’ 09 LHC-CC09Cryomodule Assembly & Test Stand.
Heat load study of cryomodule in STF
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan H. Hayano. Assembly work after cavity arrived Assumption: cavity with VT, with pickup antena, with Ar or N2 filled,
Cost Impacts of two e- ML cycles at sqrt(s) < 250 GeV purpose: not to generate a new ILC estimate, but to facilitate SB2009 decisions Peter H. Garbincius,
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 10/10/2015 Peter Quigley, MLC Design Review.
19 July 2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort 1 Cryogenic Systems Review Tom Peterson for the cryogenics global group.
2 K cryogenic plant turn-down Two slides from a talk by Laurent Tavian (CERN) Presented at Fermilab (27 Sep 2012) With introduction from Tom Peterson (Fermilab)
Rossana Bonomi ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting, 9/1/2013.
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan; H. Hayano ILC10 GDE meeting.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
Test Lab Cryogenic Requirements Kirk Davis Director’s Review of Cryogenic Capacity 26 May, 2010.
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Longitudinal HOM damping estimations for SPL cavity. status W. Weingarten 26 July 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Cryostat & LHC Tunnel Slava Yakovlev on behalf of the FNAL team: Nikolay Solyak, Tom Peterson, Ivan Gonin, and Timergali Khabibouline The 6 th LHC-CC webex.
Cryostat / Cryogenics Summary and (Proposed) Conclusions T. Peterson 25 April 2008.
MAIN LINAC CRYOMODULE DESIGN REVIEW INPUT COUPLER September 5, 2012V. Veshcherevich.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
Visiting DESY for S1-G module Norihito Ohuchi 2009/8/251 19th Biweekly Webex meeting (S1-G, Cryomodule, Cryogenics)
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
Integration and Cold Testing of the CW ERL Cryomodule at Daresbury Shrikant Pattalwar ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory (UK) On behalf of ERL Cryomodule.
Low Beta Cryomodule Development at Fermilab Tom Nicol March 2, 2011.
LCLS-II Cryomodule Design
5K shield removal experiment in STF cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi 2008/11/181ILC08-GDE-Meeting (CHICAGO)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
Cavities, Cryomodules, and Cryogenics Working Group 2 Summary Report Mark Champion, Sang-ho Kim Project X Collaboration Meeting April 12-14, 2011.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)TTC at Cornell, 2013 June 13 1 HOM absorbers; KEK HOM couplers in injector Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan
XFEL beamline loads and HOM coupler for CW
at STFC Daresbury laboratory
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Input coupler assembly, high power and thermal performance in S1-Global at KEK E. KAKO (KEK) 2011' Dec. 07 TTC meeting in Beijing.
Norihito Ohuchi – KEK (presented by P. Pierini - INFN)
Project X: Cryogenic Segmentation Issues
BDS Cryogenic System RDR Status and EDR Plans
HOM power in FCC-ee cavities
Magnetic shields inside and outside LHe tank in S1-Global cryomodule assembly at KEK E. KAKO (KEK) 2011' Dec. 07 TTC meeting in Beijing.
CEPC Cryogenic System Jianqin Zhang, Shaopeng Li
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
ILC Cryogenic Systems Draft EDR Plan
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
V. Veshcherevich Cornell University
Cryostat 5 K Thermal Shield -- Conclusions (Proposed)
CW Operation of XFEL Modules
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
KEK injector cryomodule
5K Shield Study & HL Measurements
ADS Accelerator Program in China
Construction and First Coo-down Test of cERL Injector Cryomodule
IHEP ILC Cavity Status Jiyuan Zhai (IHEP)
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
ILC - Global Design Effort
V. Veshcherevich Cornell University
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

Tom Peterson, Fermilab 6 December 2011 Cryomodule Heat Load Estimates Converted to 4.5 K Equivalent Cooling Power Tom Peterson, Fermilab 6 December 2011

Introduction This short presentation compares numbers within a few sets of cryomodule heat loads by converting 2 K, 5 K and 70 K heat to an equivalent 4.5 K cooling power Examples here ILC RDR S1-global Estimates for proposed Cornell ERL Project X The goal is to highlight some of the primary sources of cryogenic cooling load Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

Cryogenic efficiency assumptions I then calculate back to 4.5 K assuming a large 4.5 K plant at 25% efficiency. No extra safety factor or margin is applied, just best estimates scaled to 4.5 K. Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

Type 4 cryomodule Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

2 K heat loads and power Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

5 K and 40 K heat and power Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

Static Heat Leak Measurements Temperature Level Predicted Heat Leak (W) Measured Heat Leak (W ) Cryomodule #1 (alone) Measured Heat Leak (W) Cryomodule #1 (with #2) Measured Heat Leak (W) Cryomodule #2 70 K 76.8 90 81.5 77.9 4.5 K 13.9 23 15.9 13 2 K 2.8 6 5 4 (from John Weisend, July 2004) Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

4.5 K equivalent cooling power ILC RDR revised totals Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

4.5 K equivalent cooling power ILC RDR revised totals Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

4.5 K equivalent cooling power ILC RDR revised totals Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

S1-Global estimated and measured heat "S1-G-report(Thermal Test).doc" by Norihito Ohuchi Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

4.5 K equivalent cooling power S1-Global estimated static only heat, which agreed well with measured totals Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

4.5 K equivalent cooling power Cornell ERL estimated totals dominated by dynamic RF and HOM heating Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

4.5 K equivalent cooling power Project X 650 MHz cryomodule estimates Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing

Conclusions Approximate equivalencies 2 K heat load x 3 = 4.5 K equivalent 5 K - 8 K heat load x 0.75 = 4.5 K equivalent 40 K - 80 K heat load / 14 = 4.5 K equivalent For a pulsed linac where RF cavity dynamic heating at 2 K is not completely dominant, input coupler and/or higher order modes may be significant heat loads even though taken at 5 K and 70 K. Use of low conductivity cables, where feasible for signal transmission, can be a significant benefit. End effects at a cryomodule cold-to-warm transition to 2 K and to the other temperature levels are generally small compared to other heat loads. RF heat to 2 K will be significant in high energy and in high duty factor or CW linacs. As we approach CW levels of operation, cavity Q0 may be the dominant factor for cryogenic power. Cryogenic Cooling Power, 6 Dec 2011 Tom Peterson, TTC Beijing