Aortic valve preservation in acute type a dissection: Is it sound?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aortic Valve Replacement With Patch Enlargement of the Aortic Annulus

Advertisements

Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Twenty-Five Year Experience With the St

Clinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years John B. Chambers, MD, FRCP,

Clinical experience with the carbomedics valve: Early results with a new bileaflet mechanical prosthesis J.Francisco Nistal, MD, Aquilino Hurlé, MD,

Influence of the On-X mechanical prosthesis on intermediate-term major thromboembolism and hemorrhage: A prospective multicenter study Vincent Chan,

Eradication of Aortic Infections With the Use of Cryopreserved Arterial Homografts Paul R. Vogt, MD, Ludwig K. von Segesser, MD, Yves Goffin, MD PhD,

Sreekumar Subramanian, MD, Sergey Leontyev, MD, Michael A

The “first generation” of endovascular stent-grafts for patients with aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta Michael D. Dake, MD, D.Craig Miller,

Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Simultaneous Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Disease Kenji Kuwaki, MD, PhD, Nobuyoshi Kawaharada,

Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: the Hopital Foch experience (1977–1998) Jean Bachet, MD, Bertrand Goudot, MD, Gilles D Dreyfus, MD, Denis.

Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: What happens to the aortic root in the long run? Bartosz.

Mariette H. Schönbeck, Hans P. Brunner-La Rocca, Paul R. Vogt, Mario L

The influence of leukocyte filtration during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative lung function: A clinical study Tomislav Mihaljevic, MDa, Martin.

Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?

Postoperative diaphragmatic hernia after use of the right gastroepiploic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting Miralem Pasic, MD, PhD, Thierry Carrel,

Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,

Mitral valve operation in patients with the Marfan syndrome

Andreas Zierer, MD, Rochus K. Voeller, MD, Karen E

Results of allograft aortic valve replacement for complex endocarditis

Long-term results of mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease with and without chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures Tirone.

Are older patients with mechanical heart valves at increased risk?

Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, B-Khanh Lam, MD, MPH,

Transvenous versus transthoracic cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: A comparative analysis of morbidity, mortality, and survival David M. Shahian,

Support Your Specialty

T. Carrel, MD, M. Pasic, MD, U. Niederhäuser, MD, M. Turina, MD

Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: Repair by endocardial patch with infarct exclusion Tirone E. David, MD, Laura Dale, RN (by invitation), Zhao.

Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: Mode of presentation and mechanisms Siamak Mohammadi, MD, Richard Baillot, MD, Pierre Voisine,

Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD

Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis John S Ikonomidis, MD, PhD, John M Kratz, MD, Arthur J Crumbley, MD, Martha.

Intermediate-Term Outcome Of Mitral Reconstruction In Cardiomyopathy

Long-term effectiveness of operations for ascending aortic dissections

Aortic valve repair by cusp extension for rheumatic aortic insufficiency in children: Long- term results and impact of extension material Patrick O. Myers,

Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair for chronic type B dissection

Aortic Root Aneurysms: Remodeling or Composite Replacement?

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Aortic root replacement with composite valve graft

Mohammad A. Zafar, MBBS, Emily A

Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve

Frederick L. Grover, MDa, b, David J

Patient recovery after intermittent disc escape and spontaneous recession of a mechanical heart valve Francis Robicsek, MD, PhD, Joseph W. Cook, MD

Thirty-year experience with a bileaflet mechanical valve prosthesis

Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD, PhD, Diana Aicher, MD, Frank Langer, MD

Carcinoma of the esophagus: Prognostic significance of histologic type

Aortic root replacement

Patrick T. Roughneen, MD, Grant T. Fankhauser, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD

T. Brett Reece, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD

Isabella Rohrer-Gubler, Urs Niederhauser, Marko I Turina

Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some

P.K. Spanos, MD, A.D. Bisbos, MD, I.I. Arditis, MD

Heart transplantation in patients with previous cardiac operations:

Reoperation for aneurysmal disease of the ascending aorta in patients with concomitant aortic valve incompetence Matthias Karck, MDa, Joachim Cremer,

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Filip P Casselman, MD, M. Erwin S. H Tan, MD, Freddy E

Composite Valve Graft Replacement of the Aortic Root: Twenty-Seven Years of Experience at One Japanese Center Tomohiro Tsunekawa, MD, Hitoshi Ogino,

Thirty years of cardiac transplantation at stanford university

Chan B. Park, MD, Kevin L. Greason, MD, Rakesh M. Suri, MD, Hector I

Results of 102 cases of complete repair of congenital heart defects in patients weighing 700 to 2500 grams V.Mohan Reddy, MDa, Doff B. McElhinney, MDa,

Prognosis of patients undergoing emergency surgery for type A acute aortic dissection without exclusion of the intimal tear Satoshi Unosawa, MD, PhD,

Reoperation for failure of mitral valve repair

Toward a more rational approach in treating type B aortic dissection

Clinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years John B. Chambers, MD, FRCP,

Treatment of left atrial dissection after mitral repair: internal drainage Michele Genoni, MD, Rolf Jenni, MD, Edith R Schmid, MD, Paul R Vogt, MD, Marko.

Echo-free perfused spaces: A current postoperative finding after homograft replacement of the aortic valve T. Carrel, MD, M. Pasic, MD, E. Oechslin,

Duke E. Cameron, MD, Diane E. Alejo, BA, Nishant D. Patel, BA, Lois U

Which biologic valve should we select for the 45- to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement? F. Dagenais, MD, P. Cartier, MD, P. Voisine,

Risk of Valve-Related Events After Aortic Valve Repair

Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location” Kevin L. Greason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Preoperative characteristics and surgical outcomes of acute intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta: A propensity score–matched analysis Akihito.

Presentation transcript:

Aortic valve preservation in acute type a dissection: Is it sound? Ludwig K. von Segesser, MD (by invitation), Enrico Lorenzetti, (by invitation), Mario Lachat, MD (by invitation), Urs Niederhäuser, MD (by invitation), Mariette Schönbeck, MD (by invitation), Paul R. Vogt, MD (by invitation), Marko I. Turina, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 381-391 (February 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6 Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Actuarial survival probabilities of all patients undergoing operations for acute type A aortic dissection (±95% errors). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Actuarial survival probabilities of patients with supracoronary grafts (squares) versus patients with composite grafts (rhombi) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference between groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation for all patients (±95% errors). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation for patients with supracoronary grafts (squares) versus those with composite grafts (rhombi) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference between groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation for patients with preserved or repaired aortic valves (squares) versus those with mechanical aortic valves (rhombi) versus those with biologic aortic valves (triangles) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference among groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism for patients with preserved or repaired native aortic valves (squares) versus those with mechanical aortic valves (rhombi) versus those with biologic aortic valves (triangles) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference among groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Actuarial freedom from late events for patients with supracoronary grafts (squares) versus those with composite grafts (rhombi) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference between groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Actuarial freedom from late events for patients with preserved or repaired native aortic valves (squares) versus those with mechanical aortic valves (rhombi) versus those with biologic aortic valves (triangles) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference among groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1996 111, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70447-6) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions