Panel Identification Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Information Systems
Advertisements

Project Management Concepts
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Using an EMR to Support Screening Processes Session 2 1.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Chapter 12 Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management 2nd Edition Wager ~ Lee ~ Glaser.
NMAHP – Readiness for eHealth Heather Strachan NMAHP eHealth Lead eHealth Directorate Scottish Government.
CHAPTER © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices.
Recovery Support Systems The Role of Electronic Records (ERs) in the Recovery Support Model. (Why not paper charts?)
The Improvement Facilitator Role Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 1.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
Clear and Credible Plan Quarter 3 update Liane Langdon Director of Commissioning and Strategic Development Together we’re better.
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
Clinical Information System Implementation Project Prepared for Clinical Affairs Committee December 4, 2002.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
What should be the basis of
What is a Physician Hospital Compact? A compact is an agreement that clearly states the commitment of the medical staff and hospital leadership to one.
Good Pharmacy Practice- GPP Part 7. Quality Management
GENTLE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES BOYNTON BEACH,FL Learning Session 2 April 27-28, 2012.
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
1 The Three Phases of Collaboration: Chronic Disease Management, Cancer Prevention, and Capacity Kim Salamone, Ph.D. Vice President, Health Information.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Success Principles in Integrated Delivery System.
The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices
Why Screening? Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 1.
Implementing a Provincial Cancer Performance Measurement Program in Saskatchewan, Canada 4 th International Cancer Control Congress November 2011 Riaz.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
Optimizing Technology to Achieve Population Health Shannon Nielson, MHSA, PCMH-CCE Centerprise, Inc May 5 th, 2015 Indiana PCA Annual Conference
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Penny Emerit Acting Director of London Programmes May 2010 Polysystems: how do they support tackling health inequalities in Sectors and PCTs?
Development of Public Health Standards and Protocols in Nova Scotia PHPC CPD Day June 9th, 2013 Dr. Robert Strang Dr. Brent Moloughney.
Optimizing Care Mark Murray MD, MPA. Gap Between Performance and Possibility For clinical care For clinical care For efficiency in care For efficiency.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
System Changes and Interventions: Registry as a Clinical Practice Tool Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care, a national program of the Robert.
Who Does What Improvement Facilitator Training Session 2.
HIT Policy Committee METHODOLOGIC ISSUES Tiger Team Summary Helen Burstin National Quality Forum Jon White Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality October.
Welcome Alberta Screening & Prevention Initiative Improvement Facilitator Training Session 2.
Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative February 2, 2004 Oakland, CA Clinical.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
CLINICAL AUDIT A quick guide. Why Audit? ‘Clinical audit is about improvement. If you are not changing or improving things as a result of audit then ask.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
TEAM BUILDING Operating Tactics. “ None of us is as smart as all of us ” THE KEY Cooperative & Synchronized work by a team produces remarkable results.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
DOCUMENTATION FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS Balasubramanian Thiagarajan.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
1 ITAP International Competency Software A family of competency based products that integrate HR and business processes Stephen Martin: President ITAP.
Building Capacity for EMR Adoption and Data Utilization Among Safety Net Organizations Presented by Chatrian Reynolds, MPH, Evaluator, LPHI Shelina Foderingham,
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council (FSSCC) 2011 KEY FSSCC INITIATIVES 2011 Key FSSCC Initiatives Project Name: Project Description: All-Hazards.
 Pharmaceutical Care is a patient-centered, outcomes oriented pharmacy practice that requires the pharmacist to work in concert with the patient and.
Department of Preventive Medicine Faculty of Public Health University of Debrecen General Practitioners’ Morbidity Sentinel Stations Program (GPMSSP) to.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
Clinical Quality Improvement: Achieving BP Control
Health Planning Group November 2015.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Capacities for Successful Implementation
Identifying Optimal Panel Size for Primary Care Physicians
Let’s Get Digital.
Presentation transcript:

Panel Identification Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 2

Objectives Define Panel Identification Identify the importance of Panel Identification Understand elements of effective Panel Identification Understand tasks necessary to build effective processes Build your confidence to engage with clinics to solidify their Panel Identification processes

Panel Identification Guide Provincial resource, in development with multiple partners F1

What is a Patient Panel? The number of unique, unduplicated patients that have an established relationship with a primary care provider, underscored by an implicit or explicit agreement that the identified provider will provide primary care services

ASaP Alignment AsaP requires identification of panel attachment process as a first step Panel identification process will allow practices to identify those 1/3 of patients who do not usually present for screening A6

Process Change in Practice Hypertension Dyslipidemia Diabetes Breast Cancer Cervical Cancer Colorectal Cancer Exercise Diet Tobacco Alcohol Obesity

Why is Panel Identification Important? Allows equitable distribution of work across providers Assigns accountability reliable follow-up Defines workload – panel size and demographics determines demand for services which must be matched by clinical capacity (supply) in order to achieve access to services which is inherently tied to quality care Establishes platform to promote continuity of care Understanding clinical needs of patient population via demographics clear basis for defining opportunities for improved clinical care, screening and prevention

Continuity of Care Percentage of time patients see their own identified primary care provider with whom they have a continuous relationship rather than other care primary care providers.

Patient Demographics and Clinical Care Factors in predicting demand for services – Age – Sex – Clinical Diagnosis Understanding of panel demographics allows for: – population based care planning – guided decisions for clinical processes – Identifying screening, prevention and disease management priorities

Standardization Identification of a panel requires standardized processes to ensure accuracy and maintenance of lists over time EMR based clinics have an advantage in generating panel reports with the EMR acting as a database Paper based clinics also have the ability to create and maintain panel lists as the inherent processes are foundational to both systems.

Elements of Panel Identification Processes Patients are assigned to a primary care providers panel through mutual agreement to develop and maintain a healing relationship As patients are assigned, information is documented on the chart in a standardized manner (or with paper, entered in an electronic database or manual list) Panels undergo periodic and/or regular review to ensure accurate records are maintained Descriptive demographic data is collected and maintained to allow for population based care planning

Role of EMRs A tool for data collection and analysis Standardization of processes and adherence to procedures for data entry is crucial

Facilitating Teams to Identify, Improve or Create Processes Leverage team, ensure strong leadership Assess and document baseline processes Identify accuracy of panel reports generated and where gaps may exist Identify opportunities for improvement with clear measurable goals Move forward with structured plan for change

Structured Change and Improvement Jumping to solution can result in: – adoption of processes that are not effective as intended – not well planned resulting in unexpected, negative outcomes that may be difficult to retract Use a structured approach – Model for Improvement

Leadership and Team – Keys to Success Physician/Provider leadership and commitment Engage with all clinical and non-clinical staff who are involved in the process Leadership communication of overall goals creates alignment of objectives and plans Those who do the work must change the work

Panel Discussion at Blue Meadow 16 Dr. Doe (physician) Doreen (receptionist ) Weve been validating patient attachment at check-in since AIM and PDI, right? I thought those were over??

Panel Process Development Checklist Two critical questions: 1.Does the patient record indicate the provider responsible for providing screening? 2.Can the provider or team generate a list of the patients attached to the provider? C1

Panel Process Assessment Tool

Summary Panel identification and demographics are critical to understanding the clinical needs of a patient population Standardization of process and adherence to procedures across the practice is key EMRs are helpful tools for recording and analyzing data when strong processes are in place Assessing, planning and testing processes requires strong leadership and input from the team Utilize a structured methodology for developing, testing, and changing processes