INTRODUCTION TO REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS Presented at the Educator Effectiveness/CCSS Professional Learning Team Conferences April 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.

Advertisements

Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators

Training for Teachers and Specialists

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.

Arlene Paxton Advanced Training 2014

Educator Effectiveness: Making Connections & Rubric Analysis Presented by the Oregon Department of Education August 2013.

REL Appalachia and the Virginia Middle School Research Alliance Justin Baer, Director, REL Appalachia Virginia School-University Partnership Steering Committee.

School Support Teams August 2014 Odyssey. Today’s Objectives:  Define School Support Teams (SSTs)as well as their function and purpose  Who is on an.

Teacher Evaluation A Metric for Performance

Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.

Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.

1 Rhode Island School Counselor Evaluation Jean Greco, Patricia Nailor and Karl Squier RISCA Spring Conference Rhode Island Convention Center April 11,

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.

Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)

Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.

Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide

Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.

Partnering with States to Improve Transition Services: Online and In-Person Approaches Mary E. Morningstar Patricia M. Noonan Amy Gaumer Erickson Barbara.

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.

REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.

An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.

WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.

CEC’s Position SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION CEC CONVENTION SAN ANTONIO, TX 2013.

The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.

1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.

Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.

Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.

PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.

Partnering and Mentoring – Bringing People and Services Together Tuesday, April 8, 2008 ~ Plenary Session 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Organizational Self-Assessment to Achieve Health Equity Gail Brandt Health Equity Consultant National Association of Chronic Disease Directors November.

BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.

TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.

Applying the Skills for Proficient Problem Solving Instructional Intervention Teams Level 3 Training April 7, 2011.

Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.

District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.

Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.

1 P16 Resources for Student Success Today’s Focus: Planning for the School Year.

Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.

Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.

District Collaboration Grant Requirements November 17, 2015.

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL

College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.

Positive Observations and Feedback Carla Meyer University of Delaware.

IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework What you need to know and what you need to do.

National Quality Policy in the Netherlands Cordula Wagner, PhD Emmy Sluijs, PhD Mirjan Geurts, MA.

Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,

February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.

Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities

Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2

Five Required Elements

Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme

Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel

Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities

Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS Presented at the Educator Effectiveness/CCSS Professional Learning Team Conferences April 2014

Regional Peer Review Panels: Background Where did the idea come from to create and establish the regional Peer Review Panels? ESEA Waiver and Educator Effectiveness workgroup Collaboration with other states The PRP guidelines and criteria support the work of school districts to assure educator quality through a comprehensive district educator evaluation system that: establishes a common understanding of expectations for educator quality within the district; emphasizes the professional growth and continuous improvement of individual educators; creates an organizational approach to the collective professional growth and continuous improvement of groups of educators to support district goals; provides quality assurance for the performance of all district educators; assures fair, accurate, and consistent evaluations; and provides district educators a role in guiding the ongoing system development in response to systematic feedback and changing district needs.

Professional Growth & Continuous Improvement Regional Peer Review Panel Support Feedback to Districts Identify Needs Technical Assistance Professional Learning Accountability Continuous Improvement of System Inform State Policy

Regional Peer Review Panel: Process Lets review the two PRP documents: Guidance and Self-Appraisal The Initial Process: What does this look like for my district? What do we have to do?

Regional Peer Review Panel: Feedback & Input Take a look at each section of the PRP Guidance and Self-Appraisal. At your table discuss: 1. Initial thoughts about the PRP guidelines 2. Suggested modifications 3. Supports to prepare for your districts peer review Survey Monkey Link:

Regional Peer Review Panel: Input Initial comments and suggestions What supports do you need? What supports can you offer to your peers? Continue your review throughout today with your district team and provide comments via: Survey Monkey Link: Paper notes

Regional Peer Review Panel: Timeline June - December 1, 2014 Districts present their evaluation and support systems to a PRP and ODE will disseminate best practices. PRPs should be completed no later than December 1, 2014 in order for districts to benefit from technical assistance targeted to their implementation needs during the school year. Districts that are ready are encouraged to complete the PRP process during June-Aug June 2014 ODE host District/ESD PLT conferences with a focus on: -Training for PRP panel members -Present final state guidelines for including student learning and growth in educators summative evaluations (SB290 & ESEA waiver requirement) ODE, partners, and technical assistance providers provide targeted and regional support to districts; continue to disseminate best practices

Contact Information Sarah Phillips, Education Specialist E: P: Theresa Richards, Director of Educator Effectiveness E: P: