Using a Faculty Learning Community to Take the Next Step

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Selected Institutions decide to examine an online or hybrid course as part of a peer review. Since institutions make a significant investment in.
Advertisements

Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
NWACC Library Instruction Program Teaching information literacy skills for academic success and lifelong learning.
Peer Reviewer Training The SLN Quality Matters Initiative Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning.
Applying Assessment to Learning
eLearning project Pg. Dip Course: Understanding Assessment Anne Cox School of Education and Training University of Greenwich.
Turnitin A Tool for Student Interaction and Academic Feedback Objective: Teachers will identify and create opportunities for students to interact and provide.
Powered by Faculty Learning Community Survey Monday, April 13, 2015.
Online Course Quality and Peer Review Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project “QUALITY MATTERS” Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Data Collection and Preliminary Analysis Our survey addressed the first two of the questions presented in this study. The Qualtrics survey was framed by.
Barry A. Berger Professor of Regulatory Affairs Temple University School of Pharmacy QA/RA Graduate Program 1Discussion-BABTechDay2012.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 11 th and 12 th June 2009.
University of Michigan Medical School Academy for Educational Excellence and Scholarship Monthly Seminar – October 20, Academy Business (15 minutes)
BUT HOW WILL THIS WORK FOR ME? Reading Apprenticeship at Edmonds Community College… a work in progress. Melody Schneider.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Introduction.
Faculty as Students: August 12, 2015 Distance Teaching & Learning Conference Kathy Keairns & Heather Tobin One Model.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
Teaching and Learning Enhancement Box Hill Institute.
Composition Class Before and After QM Peer Review
Carin Chuang, Assoc. Professor of Computer Information Technology
The Power of Supplemental Instruction (SI)
New Mexico State University “Every course a quality course.”
Quality Matters 6th Annual Conference
From Ad Hoc to Intentional: One Department's Online Journey
MBA CLASS CONTENT AND TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
Moving forward into a new generation of teaching and learning
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
Madalina Tincu, Ed. D. Mitchell Strauss, Ed. D.
Going Beyond Course Design: Implementing Online Delivery Standards
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Once Upon a Time there was a small college in Westchester County, NY
Specific Review Standard 5.3
Peer Learning Assistants –
Becoming an Online Teacher
Faculty Development: Preparing Clinical Nursing Instructors
Learn. Engage. Grow Student Affairs Professional Development Day 2017
Jumping on the QM Bandwagon
Calming the Waves, Navigating a Sea of Reluctance
The Creation of a Quality Online Continuous Improvement Plan
Richard Kettley, Rachel Lucas, Dr Matthew Bates and Dr Martha Glazzard
Accessibility in Online Courses
INtopFORM Faculty Learning Community Survey
Self-Directed Learning in Formal Education Settings
Dos and Don’ts for Effective E-Learning Practices
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
EVC Accreditation Update Fall 2017 PDD Thursday, 3/31/17
Director Sarah Livesay
Please respond to this on-line student evaluation of this class Dear instructor, End-of-term course evaluations are now available to your students.
Specific Review Standard 5.3
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
The Road to Success: A Scaffolded Process
Developing Faculty to Teach Online
Mitchell Strauss, Ed. D & Madalina Tincu, Ed. D.
Blackboard 8: Discussion Board
Professor Lindsay Henning Program Director,
Jennifer Nardine and Lesley Moyo Virginia Tech USA
Overview of Class #2 The context in which you are learning to teach mathematics, and the accompanying challenges Comments & questions about the syllabus.
Using a Faculty Learning Community to Take the Next Step
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
January 2018 PPG Workshop Evaluation
With a Dash of Encouragement and a Sprinkle of Expectations
PEP Webinar for Employees Review Cycle
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Dr. Sheri Conklin; Erika Hanson, Ginu Easow & Zach Morgan
Sherrell Wheeler Director of Online Quality Assurance
Participant Engagement! Synchronous Online Video Sessions
Presentation transcript:

Using a Faculty Learning Community to Take the Next Step Or, “How to overcome the paralyzing fear of a formal QM Review”

The Challenge Over 140 Faculty completed APPQMR ZERO took the next step Fear? Time? Lack of Understanding?

The Concept Give them Time and Community Create Structure Apply the FLC Model Compensate for Achievement

The Requirements Attend 8 of 12 Workshops Conduct a Self-Review Participate in Pair/Share Mini- Review Complete Course Worksheet Submit Workshop Evaluation

The Schedule Two Options: Monday Afternoon Thursday Morning Begin with Standard 2 Move to Standard 8 Follow with Standards 1, 3, 5, 6, & 7

Typical Agenda Review of Each Specific Standard Examples of “Met” or “Not Met” Discussion of Alternatives to Meet Standards Online Research Hands on Activity

The Materials & Activities QM Materials Helpful Recommendations Laminated Bloom’s Professor Dancealot Activities Pair/Share of Standard 4 Write test items for each Bloom’s Level Outcome/Assessment Challenge Document Styles for Accessibility

The Results 9 of 12 Completed the Requirements 2 classes completed “Informal Review” 3 Instructors Committed to Formal Review 1 Currently under Formal Review

Feedback from Participants All respondents reported that: Participation in the FLC significantly built their confidence in course design. They are likely to recommend this FLC to their colleagues. 75% of respondents: would repeat the FLC next year to revise another hybrid or online course. plan to submit their course for a complete, informal review.

Other Comments from Participants The FLC is a great opportunity for exchange among instructors. I got some really helpful feedback from a peer. This gave me the specific tools that I needed. The FLC gave me the experiential training and support needed to feel confident in making the changes to my course. Getting involved in this FLC was well worth my time.

Repeat! VP of Instruction funded it again! 16 Faculty joined the Learning Community Focus this year on Hybrid Courses Increased involvement from a broader range of disciplines

Presenters LAURIE ADAMSON: PR, MR, OFC FOR APPQMR FACULTY LADAMSON@OLYMPIC.EDU KATHY BRIGHT: PR, MR, OFC for APPQMR/IYOC ELEARNING DIRECTOR KBRIGHT@OLYMPIC.EDU All images courtesy of Google Images, Labeled for non- commercial reuse.