Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Mark Ultsch, Nathalie A Lokker, Paul J Godowski, Abraham M de Vos 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Conformational changes on substrate binding to methylmalonyl CoA mutase and new insights into the free radical mechanism  Filippo Mancia, Philip R Evans 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages (October 1996)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Crystal structure of the apoptotic suppressor CrmA in its cleaved form
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The crystal structure of the flavin containing enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase A from Lactococcus lactis  Paul Rowland, Finn S Nielsen, Kaj Frank.
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon WN Au, Sheila Gover, Veronica MS Lam, Margaret J Adams  Structure  Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 293-303 (March 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0

Figure 1 A dimer of human G6PD viewed down the twofold axis. In subunit A helices are coloured pink and β strands are blue; in subunit B helices and strands are green and orange, respectively. Secondary structure elements are labelled in subunit A. Structural NADP+ molecules are drawn in dark blue in ball-and-stick mode. The dinucleotide-binding fingerprint and conserved peptide are highlighted in purple. The Cα atoms of some residues discussed in detail in the text are drawn as magenta spheres in subunit B. These are Pro172 (cis/trans conformation), Cys446 (disulphide bridge), Arg459 (mutation site of Canton variant), and Glu206, Lys407, Glu419 and Arg427 (involved in salt bridges at the dimer interface). The N-terminal residues 1–26 are not shown. (The figure was prepared using BOBSCRIPT [42,43] and RASTER3D [44,45].) Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 2 The G6PD tetramer. (a) Tetramer ABCD shown with the long tetramer axis running vertically into the plane of the page. The four subunits A, B, C and D are shown in blue, orange, green and pink, respectively. Structural NADP+ molecules are drawn in dark blue in ball-and-stick mode. (b) The salt bridge residues linking subunits B and C drawn in the same orientation as Figure 3a and coloured by atom type: carbon, grey; oxygen, red; nitrogen blue. (The figure was prepared using BOBSCRIPT [42,43] and RASTER3D [44,45].) Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 3 The structural NADP+ site. (a) The Fo–Fc difference map for NADP+ contoured at 2.8σ. The NADP+ molecule is shown in orange in ball-and-stick mode. The secondary structure elements are labelled. The colour scheme for the sheets and helices is the same as in Figure 1. (b) Ring stacking and hydrogen-bond interactions with the NADP+ molecule. Hydrogen bonds are shown as green dotted lines. Residues in the binding cleft are coloured by atom type as described in Figure 2b. In order to show the NADP+ clearly, its carbon atoms are in yellow and phosphorus atoms are in purple. The orientation is the same as in (a). (The figure was prepared using BOBSCRIPT [42,43] and RASTER3D [44,45].) Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 4 Stereoview of the 2Fo–Fc electron density around Pro172, contoured at 0.95σ. (a) Trans Pro172 in subunit A. (b) Cis Pro172 in subunit E, with the trans Pro172 of subunit A superimposed in green. The orientation is the same as in (a). Atoms are coloured as in Figure 2b. (The figure was prepared using BOBSCRIPT [42,43] and RASTER3D [44,45].) Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 5 Class I mutations at the dimer interface and close to the structural NADP+ site. (a) Helices and sheets are drawn as coils using the same colour scheme as in Figure 1. The red and yellow spheres indicate the mutations in subunits A and B, respectively. The structural NADP+ molecules in both subunits are drawn in dark blue in ball-and-stick mode, as are the sidechains of the Asp421 residues. (b) Variants ‘Shinagawa’ G410D, Tokyo E416K, ‘Georgia’ Y428 STOP, and Sumare V431G at the dimer interface shown in stick mode. The carbon atoms of the mutated residues are shown in magenta and were modelled using the program O [37]. The colour scheme for subunits A and B is the same as in (a). The salt bridge linking Asp416 and Lys408 is drawn as a black dashed line with its length given in Å. The steric clash predicted after replacing Gly410 with aspartate is highlighted by the distances shown in red. (The figure was prepared using BOBSCRIPT [42,43] and RASTER3D [44,45].) Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 6 A comparison of the surface potential in human and L. mesenteroides G6PD. (a) Potential surface of the structural NADP+ site in human G6PD. The locations of some of the residues in the NADP+ site are labelled. The atoms of NADP+ are coloured by type (carbon is yellow, oxygen red, nitrogen blue and phosphorus green). (b) Potential surface of L. mesenteroides G6PD in the same region with the structural NADP+ of the human enzyme superimposed in green. Residues 344, 372, 382, 465 and 471 in the L. mesenteroides enzyme structurally align with residues 366, 393, 403, 487 and 493, respectively, in the human enzyme. Residue Gly485 at the C terminus of the L. mesenteroides enzyme is also labelled. In both diagrams, the surface is colour-coded according to electrostatic potential on a scale from –10 to +10, where blue and red areas represent positively and negatively charged regions, respectively. (The figures were generated using the program GRASP [46]). Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 7 Sequence alignment around the human G6PD binding site for structural NADP+. The four groups containing human, Caenorhabditis elegans, Nicotiana tabacum and L. mesenteroides are successively less likely to retain the site. The figure to the left of the species name indicates the number of equivalent sequences in the sample of 35 aligned (see text), dashed lines show the evolutionary tree, plus signs indicate connection points. Binding residues are shown in green and conservative replacements are in grey. Residues conserved in all species are in blue; residues conserved in all species but one are in violet. Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)

Figure 8 The association of subunits in G6PD and GFOR. (a) Overlap of the β + α domain sheet of monomer A of G6PD (in green) with that of monomer A of GFOR (in cyan). The contrast in the methods by which this sheet is extended in the two enzymes is illustrated. (b) The G6PD tetramer. (c) The GFOR tetramer with monomer A in the same orientation as that of G6PD. The secondary structure elements hindering the formation of a GFOR-like tetramer for G6PD are indicated in red. (The figures were generated using BOBSCRIPT [42,43] and RASTER3D [44,45].) Structure 2000 8, 293-303DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00104-0)