Blood XMRV Scientific Research Working Group Mission - design and coordinate research studies to evaluate whether XMRV poses a threat to blood safety Working.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Number of specimens tested
Advertisements

1 HIV Drug Resistance Training Module 7: HIV Genotyping Assay Validation.
Nick Curry, MD, MPH Infectious Diseases Prevention Section
Marta José, Instituto Grifols S.A., Barcelona, SPAIN
High Throughput Donor Plasma NAT Screening Assay Applied to Acute HIV Detection in a Public Health Setting December 5, 2007 Josh Goldsmith, Ph.D. National.
Development of a Panel for Dengue Virus Maria Rios, PhD CBER/FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee Meeting December 14, 2010.
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control Assuring the quality of biological medicines Proposal for a Hepatitis A genotype panel Rob Anderson.
In latent infection- retroviral genome is present but is not transcribing viral genome or mRNA for structural proteins. Distinguished by qPCR (DNA) and.
Utilizing a Non-Commercial Real- Time PCR to Detect HIV-1 RNA in HIV Antibody Negative Diagnostic Sera Submitted to The Maryland Public Health Laboratory.
Pediatric Diagnosis of HIV-1 Infection Using Dried Blood Spots Chin-Yih Ou, PhD NCHSTP/DHAP Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The Sense of Sensitivity I Dr. Matthias Gessner Plasma Control Europe/Plasma Analytics Baxter AG, Vienna.
Murine Leukemia Virus (MLV) Related Human Retroviruses and Blood Safety BPAC meeting, December 14, 2010 Indira Hewlett, Ph. D Chief, Laboratory of Molecular.
Use of avidity reagent. Panbio Buffered Avidity Reagent Mild protein-denaturing solution that may be useful in differentiating recent infections from.
Impact of Testing Strategies to Reduce Transmission Risk for HBV Ravi Reddy, M Vermeulen South African National Blood Service (SANBS) 29 July 2013.
Karen Cristiano Biologicals Unit, CRIVIB Calibration against the WHO Standards of National Reference Preparations for detection of blood viruses by NAT:
Is Nucleic Acid Testing for Organ Donors the ‘Right’ Choice? Reference: Humara A, Morrisb M, Blumbergc R, et al. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) of organ donors:
Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) as an Emerging Pathogen: Relevance to Semen Donation Michael J. Cannon, Ph.D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Detection of XMRV/pMuLV Infections in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Healthy Blood Donors Shyh-Ching Lo, Ph.D., M.D. Division of Cellular and.
F. Kourgia, M. Vini, E. Zervou
Dengue Virus and Its Risk to the U.S. Blood Supply
Blood XMRV Scientific Research Working Group Funding for currently launched studies via NHLBI REDS-II Program Central Lab BSRI - Graham Simmons NAT Lab.
Screening for HBsAg and Anti-HBc in North American Blood Donors John Saldanha, Roche Molecular Systems SoGAT XXI, May, 2009, Brussels, Belgium.
HIV Testing CDC power point edited by M. Myers
Update on CDC XMRV Activities R. Michael Hendry, D.Sc. Chief, Laboratory Branch DHAP, NCHHSTP, CDC Blood Products Advisory Committee July 26, 2010 The.
Parvovirus B19 NAT for Whole Blood and Source Plasma Introduction and Background Mei-ying W Yu, PhD DH/OBRR/CBER/FDA 75 th Blood Products Advisory Committee.
E992750C 1 Replacement of HIV-1 p24 Antigen Screening with HIV-1 RNA Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Whole Blood Donations S.L. Stramer, R.A. Porter, J.P.
Dr. Peter R. Ganz Director, Centre for Blood and Tissues Evaluation, Health Canada Strategies for Managing Potential Xenotropic Murine Virus Related Virus.
21 August 2015 Samreen Ijaz Virus Reference Department Health Protection Agency Indigenous HEV infection in the UK: a hazard for blood donation?
BioLife Plasma Services Experience with HBV NAT Testing
Reentry for Donors Deferred Based on Anti-HBc Test Results November 3, 2005 BPAC Meeting FDA/CBER/OBRR/DETTD.
Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus Related Virus (XMRV) Informational Presentation BPAC meeting, July 26, 2010 Indira Hewlett, Ph. D Chief, Laboratory of.
FDA’s Current Considerations of Parvovirus B19 Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Mei-ying W. Yu, PhD Division of Hematology CBER/FDA Extraordinary SoGAT Meeting.
Transmissibility of B19 by transfusion: evaluation of donor viremia prior to performing a linked donor-recipient study M Busch, representing REDS-II Parvo.
Lara Isobel Compston, Daniel Candotti, Jean-Pierre Allain
IN THE NAME OF GOD Blood Safety S. AMINI KAFI ABAD CLINICAL AND ANATOMICAL PATHOLOGIST IRANIAN BLOOD TRANSFUSION ORGANIZATION(IBTO) RESEARCH CENTER June.
21th VHPB meeting on “Prevention of viral hepatitis in Italy: lessons learnt and the way forward” Catania, 7-8 november 2002 RESIDUAL RISK OF TRANSFUSION-
E A 1 Parvovirus B19 and HAV Screening of Whole Blood Donations SL Stramer, KL Kane, ML Beyers, RY Dodd, American Red Cross and RIF Smith, National.
Detection of Dengue Virus RNA in Blood Donors from Honduras and Brazil with a Prototype Transcription-Mediated Amplification Assay.
Retrospective and Prospective U.S. Donor MRV Surveillance and Transmission Studies Michael Busch, MD, PhD Blood Systems Research Institute Dept of Laboratory.
Approval Criteria for Assays for Testing Blood Donors for West Nile Virus Robin Biswas, M.D. CBER, FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee Meeting March.
A preliminary report on the Leukocyte Antibody Prevalence Study (LAPS-I) Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II) presented by Dr. Steven Kleinman.
Stability of HCV, HIV-1 and HBV nucleic acids in plasma samples stored at different temperatures Marta José, Rodrigo Gajardo and Juan I. Jorquera Instituto.
1 Blood Systems Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas Disease Studies and Potential Strategies for Targeted Testing of Donors Blood Products Advisory Committee.
An Update on FDA/OBRR XMRV activities BPAC meeting, July 26, 2010 Indira Hewlett, Ph. D Chief, Laboratory of Molecular Virology DETTD/CBER/FDA.
1 Procleix ® WNV Assay: A TMA-based Assay for Screening Blood Donations for West Nile Virus RNA Jeff Linnen, Ph.D. Research and Development Gen-Probe Incorporated,
Progress in West Nile virus Testing and Donor Screening Hira Nakhasi, Ph.D. Director, DETTD/OBRR CBER, FDA.
West Nile Virus: Pathogenesis and Diagnostic Tools Maria Rios, PhD - Senior Staff Fellow Laboratory of Molecular Virology DETTD/OBRR/CBER/FDA WNV epidemic.
Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Retrovirus: CCR Assay Development.
Development of Standard Reagents for WNV NAT M. Rios, A. Grinev, K. Sirnivasan, O. Wood, S. Daniel, I. Hewlett CBER/FDA.
Update on the P. falciparum Standard & Replacement of the HBV & HCV International Standards Sally Baylis, NIBSC SoGAT XIX.
A multi-centre NAT evaluation study of run and trend control samples Harry van Drimmelen 1, Joe O’Donnellan 2, Rene Bax 1, Henrik Ullum 3 and the Danish.
NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNOLOGY HCV-RNA / HBV-DNA / HIV-RNA testing blood and blood components for transfusion Italian External Quality Assessment.
SoGAT 2005 Donor screening for parvovirus B19 antibodies: Reducing or eliminating the risk of transmission SoGAT 2005 Gordon Elliott Biotrin 93 The Rise.
An Overall View of Standardization May 26, 2004 Indira Hewlett, Ph.D. CBER/FDA.
Validation of Nucleic Acid and Serological Tests to Screen Blood and Plasma donors for Acute infection with West Nile virus Hira Nakhasi, Ph.D. Director,
Epidemiology of Transfusion Transmitted Disease Sharyn Orton, MT(ASCP)SBB, M.S.P.H, Ph.D. candidate Project Leader, Transmissible Diseases Department American.
Risk assessment: The Safety of Blood Products presented by Dr. Thomas R. Kreil Baxter BioScience on behalf of the PPTA Pathogen Safety Steering Committee.
February 24, 2016 | 1 Paul Strengers MD, FFPM Sanquin Blood Supply Amsterdam The Netherlands Risk assessment schemes: Impact of.
CBER Update on status of West Nile virus test, lot release and validation panel development Indira Hewlett, Ph.D CBER/FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee.
 Routine viral diagnostics: indirect and direct detection of viruses. ◦ Indirect detection: serological tests; ◦ Direct detection:  Viral antigens;
Relative Sensitivities of US Licensed NAT Assays for Detection of Viremia in Early HIV and HCV Infection MP Busch, SA Glynn, DJ Wright, D Hirschkorn, ME.
BioPlex 2200 HIV Ag-Ab Assay
Incorporation of NAT into supplemental testing of HCV and HIV seroreactive donors Michael P. Busch representing Blood Systems Research Institute Blood.
Abbott Laboratories ConfidentialPage 1 Update on West Nile Virus George J. Dawson, Ph.D. Abbott Laboratories.
Saeko Mizusawa, Yoshiaki Okada
Update on CBER HIV-1 Subtype panel
Evaluation of Candidate Standard XX (97/650)
NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTING DETECTS HIV TRANSMISSION RISK IN SEROLOGICALLY- TESTED BLOOD DONOR UNITS. |Presented by Miss Shemau Muniru| Authors:
Results of blind panel testing.
Presentation transcript:

Blood XMRV Scientific Research Working Group Mission - design and coordinate research studies to evaluate whether XMRV poses a threat to blood safety Working Group includes representatives from transfusion medicine, retrovirology, and CFS scientific communities, as well as representatives from key Federal Agencies including HHS, FDA, NCI, CDC and NHLBI Evaluation of blood safety risks includes several steps: Evaluate XMRV nucleic acid and antibody assays Establish prevalence of XMRV in blood donors Determine if XMRV is transfusion-transmitted Determine if transfusions are associated with CFS or prostate cancer (epidemiology studies)

Blood XMRV Scientific Research Working Group Funding for currently launched studies via NHLBI REDS-II Program Testing Labs - Investigators BSRI - Graham Simmons CDC - Bill Switzer, Walid Heneine FDA - Indira Hewlett FDA - Shyh-Ching Lo NCI - John Coffin WPI - Judy Mikovits NHLBI - Simone Glynn - Chair HHS - Jerry Holmberg - Co-chair NIH - Harvey Alter ABC - Celso Bianco CDC - William Bower BSRI - Michael Busch ARC - Roger Dodd FDA - Jay Epstein FDA - Diane Gubernot NIH - Eleanor Hanna CDC- Michael Hendry MVRBC - Louis Katz AABB - Steven Kleinman CDC - Stephan Monroe NCI - Francis Ruscetti ARC - Susan Stramer BSRI - Leslie Tobler CFIDS - Suzanne Vernon

Phase I - Analytical Panels Evaluate performance of XMRV NAT assays Phase II - Pilot Clinical Studies Whole Blood versus PBMC Timing of sample preparation Phase III - Clinical Sensitivity/Specificity Panel Assay performance on pedigreed clinical samples Phase IV - Blood Donor Clinical Panel Initial estimation of XMRV nucleic acids prevalence in blood donors Initiation of donor seroprevalence studies XMRV SRWG REDS-II Panel Study Phases

Analytical performance panels Comparison of Limit Of Detections and accuracy of Viral Loads of current assays; standardize performance of future XMRV detection assays for blood cells and plasma Whole blood panel - spiked with XMRV positive cells Plasma panel - spiked with supernatant containing XMRV 22Rv1 cells Human prostate cell line chronically infected with XMRV Contain at least 10 XMRV proviral copies each Metzger et al (2010) J Virol 84:1874 (PMID: ) Virus supernatant Supernatant from cultured 22Rv1 cells Approximate Viral Load of 5 x 10 9 RNA copies/ml Phase I - Analytical Panels

Analytical Panel Production Whole blood Plasma Whole Blood (WB) unit from pedigreed (NAT and serology) negative donor Plasma components from two pedigreed (NAT and serology) negative donors 22Rv1 cells spiked into WB to yield 9,900 22Rv1 cells per ml of WB 22Rv1 supernatant spiked to give approximately 250,000 RNA copies per ml of plasma Three-fold dilutions in fresh WBfive-fold dilutions in fresh plasma 0.5 ml aliquots to give 15 panels with three replicates at each dilution, plus 6 negative controls

Analytical Panel Set-up Whole bloodPlasma 250,000 copies/ml 50,000 10,000 2, ,900 cells/ml 3,300 1, Distributed as two blinded panels of 36 samples each

Participating Lab Assays - Whole Blood

Participating Lab Assays - Plasma

Analytical Panel Results - Whole Blood * False positive result identified as non-specific band of human genomic origin by sequencing subsequent to decoding of results

Analytical Panel Results - Whole Blood 0/3 or 0/6 1/6 1/3 2/3 3/3 CDC BSRI FDA FDA WPI NCI (Lo) (Hewlett) Cells per ml * False positive result identified as non-specific band of human genomic origin by sequencing subsequent to decoding of results * Proviral copies per ml

Analytical Panel Results - Plasma 0/3 or 0/6 1/3 2/3 3/3 CDC FDA FDA WPI NCI (Lo) (Hewlett) ,000 10,000 50, ,000 RNA copies per ml

Conclusions and Limitations XMRV NAT detection assays were sensitive All WB assays detected at least 136 proviral copies/ml and four out of six [CDC, FDA(Lo), WPI and NCI] assays demonstrated even greater limits of detection Four out of five plasma RNA assays performed similarly, with limits of detection of at least 80 RNA copies/ml Limitations The study is too small to conduct meaningful statistical comparisons or additional analysis (such as probit to derive confidence intervals around limits of detection) WB panel lacked sufficient dilutions to reach endpoints XMRV isolate with which 22Rv1 cells are infected may not adequately represent the diversity of XMRV clinical isolates Further work on analytical panel development will need to be performed

Phase II - Pilot Studies Whole Blood versus PBMC versus plasma Original Lombardi et al. study performed on isolated PBMC and plasma Large scale studies for prevalence facilitated by using WB or plasma Donor-recipient and other repositories are mainly comprised of frozen WB and/or plasma Timing of Processing Processing and freezing of donor samples slotted to be included in the blood donor clinical panel (phase IV) vary from 2-4 days due to requirements for completion of ID testing. Available donor repositories include frozen WB and plasma samples processed 1-3 days post- phlebotomy. Studies with other cell-associated viruses (HERVs, HTLV, herpesviruses and anelloviruses), demonstrate that levels of viral nucleic acid in plasma and whole blood vary with time from collection to processing and frozen storage.

Phase II – Pilot Study Setup XMRV-positive samples WPI has collected blood from four CFS patients previously identified as XMRV positive in the Lombardi et al. study (by PCR, serology and culture) Samples separated into tubes and were processed immediately, or left at 4 o C for 2 or 4 days Each sample was processed into PBMC, WB and plasma. Analysis Panels were distributed by WPI to CDC and NCI for testing; WPI retained one panel for testing. One set of the panel was distributed to BSRI to keep and use for follow-up work as needed.

Phase III - Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity The ability of participant assays to effectively detect clinical XMRV- positive and -negatives will be examined To attempt to overcome the issues of clinical variation and specificity, larger numbers of pedigreed clinical XMRV-positive and -negative samples are being assembled into coded cell and plasma panels to be distributed to all labs Positives 25 clinical samples will be collected by WPI. All will be from patients reported in the Lombardi et al. study to be positive for XMRV by PCR, serology and virus culture. Method and timing of processing will be determined based on pilot study data Negatives PCR detection assays have the potential to amplify non-specific human derived genomic sequences Thus, a larger group of pedigreed negative donors is required in order to introduce generic variability (10 donors, with 3 replicates per donor = 30 negative donor samples in each panel) The donors will be pedigreed negative by PCR at WPI, FDA (Dr. Lo) and CDC labs, and for serology at WPI, CDC and NCI (Dr. Ruscetti) labs

Source and coding of donor specimens: Phase IV - Clinical Panel for Donor Prevalence BSI/CTS processed residual blood in pilot tubes (vacutainer tubes used for routine ID screening) from 396 donations given by apheresis and double-RBC donors in the Reno/Tahoe area in Dec 2009 into replicate frozen WB and plasma aliquots. Aliquots were anonymized as sequentially coded samples after capturing donor gender, age and zip code of residence

Blinded panels consisting of approximately 300 blood donor samples, 25 confirmed XMRV-positive clinical samples and about 30 pedigreed-negative samples from 10 independent donors will be created for WB and plasma Blinded panels will be distributed to at least four of the participating laboratories for testing. Test results will be analyzed: Correlation between whole blood and plasma testing will be determined for each lab and between labs. Preliminary XMRV prevalence in blood donors (proportion positive for XMRV DNA or RNA) will be estimated based on compiled results from each lab. Phase IV - Clinical Panel for Donor Prevalence

NHLBI specimen repositories* for potential future studies of XMRV prevalence in donors over time and rates of transfusion transmission Study NameTime FramePopulationSpecimen TypeNumber of Specimens Major Agents Studied TTVS Donor - RecipSerum 5,655 donat'ns 1533 recip'ts HCV, HBV REDS: RADAR Donor - RecipPlasma; Frozen Whole Blood 13,201 donat'ns 3,574 recip'ts Parvovirus B19 TRIPS ongoingDonor - RecipPlasma; Frozen Whole Blood ~6,000 donat'ns ~1,000 recip'ts HHV-8, CMV, EBV, Parvo B19 NIH Clinical Center Donor - RecipSerum 29,055 donat'ns 3,429 recip'ts HCV, HGV/GBV-C, TTV, SENV VATS Donor - Recip Plasma; Frozen Whole Blood 3,864 donat'ns 531 recip'ts HIV, CMV, HBV, HCV, HGV, HTLV FACTS Recip Serum11,494 recip'ts HIV, HTLV, HCV, HHV- 8, T.cruzi TSS DonationsSerum201,212 donat'nsHIV, HTLV REDS GSR DonationsSerum508,151 donat'nsHBV, CMV, HHV-8 REDS GLPR DonationsPlasma; Frozen Whole Blood 147,915 donat'nsHBV, CMV, HHV-8 *: ISBT International Forum: "Biobanks of blood from donors and recipients of blood products". Vox Sang, 94(2): , 2008: USA: Kleinman S, Bianco C, Stramer SL, Dodd RY, Busch MP. pp Numbers updated as of June 2010.