Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
Advertisements

OpportunitiesChallengesNeeds Already have 217 recognized FLMMA sites. Not ecologically representativeMaps of reef habitats to help optimize design Organizations.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Why Return on Investment (ROI) Matters Raimo Vuorinen presenting for: James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
WWF – World Bank Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool What is Management Effectiveness Evaluation? Sue Stolton.
Building Resilient Marine Protected Areas in Madagascar By Harifidy Ralison 31 January 2008.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE Preparing Component Programmes January 2011.
Our mission… We believe that the Earth’s natural heritage must be maintained if future generations are to thrive spiritually, culturally & economically.
KBA Conservation Network Wanglang Nature Reserve, June 5-8, 2007.
Approaches and Mainstreaming of Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Europe International workshop “Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to climate change.
Country Group Update 2010 Wales Steve Jackson, WAG © Stuart Smith/CCW.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
12 th Meeting of the GBIF Participant Nodes Committee 6-7 October 2013, Berlin, Germany Data mobilization and use for international policy Olaf Bánki Senior.
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Agree on deployment, UNEP Live – uneplive.unep.org.
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
How can information systems help us?
Projects, Events and Training
Setting Up a National Data Archive: The Ugandan Experience
The Project Outputs and Activities.
15 countries + o/s territories are ok too
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Alexis Morgan – CEW/YCAS May 16th, 2002.
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Scotland’s Environment Web Environmental Data Portal Joanna Muse Scottish Environment Protection Agency.
Evaluating Partnerships
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
Citizen Science’s contribution to GEO BON
Standards for success in city IT and construction projects
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
UNEP Live – uneplive.unep.org
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
LWT’s Conservation Strategy: 25 year forward look
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
STRUCTURED DIALOGUE FOLLOW UP
Consultation & Participation
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Carers and place-based commissioning
Community Integration and Development USP Conference May 2013
Eirini Politi EuroLag March 2018 Athens, Greece
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
Kerstin Sundseth, Ecosystems LTD
Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast - February 2009
Regional workshop on Approaches to the implementation and monitoring of community-based ecosystem approach to fisheries management (CEAFM): finding common.
Because we would like to make a meaningful contribution to our world we launched our frim commitment for this effort. Scouts for SDGs mobilization. © World.
Management of Natura 2000 Sites
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Workshop Plenary Maintaining Protected Areas for Now and the Future
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
Information and outreach
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3 – Nature DG Environment, European Commission
Environment and Development Policy Section
Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management
MIHARI: Fisher knowledge, awareness and behaviour change for the conservation of dugongs and seagrass - The MIHARI network of locally managed marine.
IUCN’s Global Priorities supporting BIOPAMA Trevor Sandwith
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Comprehensive M&E Systems
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
The Joint Research Centre and the power of data to support decision making on protected and conserved areas Gran Paradiso National Park, Cogne, Aosta,
Piotr Białowolski, Paolo Roggeri Carlo Paolini
The View from Gran Paradiso
BIOPAMA - IMET Overview and clinics.
Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR)
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected and Conserved Areas Results of workshop facilitated by PJ Stephenson © PJ Stephenson

Examples of Challenges Identified: Capacity Monitoring often only happens when projects are present and is therefore timebound, unsustainable and lacks continuity Too much reliance on external/expatriate expertise No culture of monitoring and data use for decision-making Monitoring schemes are sometimes too ambitious and try to do too much Funding and capacity are inadequate and short-term Monitoring is often seen as extra work - not part of the management norm   Indicator selection Lack of appropriate, measurable thresholds Unclear how much time is needed to collect data for different indicators

Examples of Challenges Identified: Data collection Multiple, disparate, unharmonized and non-comparable methods for data collection within and between countries Lots of plans and protocols that are not used Monitoring not integrated across taxa, land/seascapes etc Hard for managers to choose appropriate tools and methods (or even know what is available) Monitoring often not participatory or collaborative Lack of baselines Effort biased towards certain species.

Examples of Challenges Identified: Data storage and analysis Data collected are not properly assessed or analysed Researchers do not always share their data No integration between data portals.   Data presentation and reporting Unwillingness to share data for various reasons Assumptions made that PA management effectiveness equates to biodiversity outcomes No systematic capture and sharing of lessons. Data use in decision-making Poor communication between data collectors and managers Focus on management outcomes rather than conservation outcomes Analyses not well synthesized for decision-makers No process in place for data to inform decisions.

Examples of Potential Opportunities and Solutions: Prioritize monitoring needs Keep in mind the need to develop systems that: Are easy to maintain and sustainable Are simple and effective Can be implemented by park managers and allow analyses at the site level. Build on what is there: Build on existing initiatives, tools and data portals (e.g. regional BIOPAMA observatories and resource hubs; Coral Reef Monitoring Network; IUCN Commissions tackling issues around monitoring; State of Protected and Conserved Areas Reports; GBIF BID project, etc etc) Map existing tools and identify those most relevant for monitoring Green List criteria (in relation to thresholds, indicators, data collection, data storage and analysis, identifying partners and building capacity). Break silos by developing platforms and tools to link different systems.  

Examples of Potential Opportunities and Solutions: Define systems and ways of operating: Identify the questions that need answering with monitoring Streamline and simplify monitoring processes, indicators and systems Develop integrated PA monitoring systems across species, ecosystems and land/seascapes with local adaptations that take account of PA goals and species Adopt an ecosystem approach and think ecologically Develop and implement relevant partnerships Build on projects and institutionalize monitoring (data collection, analysis, sharing) by incorporating it into the roles of national governments and relevant departments as well as PA staff Make better use of law enforcement staff for data collection Ensure all research data are fed back to government departments Identify local agencies able to collect and share data Develop citizen science initiatives where they are appropriate and effective.  

Examples of Potential Opportunities and Solutions: Key guidelines and support needed for capacity building: Develop standardized methods for monitoring species and habitats in PAs of different sizes in different biomes Collect and share all relevant papers and guidelines relating to monitoring Provide links to monitoring tools from the IUCN Red List website Develop a decision-support system to help people choose between the different tools and methods available Produce and share case studies and good examples of successful monitoring Provide guidance for developing data management plans at different levels Develop templates for monitoring assessments (defining options for monitoring and what they each take in terms of capacity needed, time, cost, what you get out of it, etc).    

Examples of Potential Opportunities and Solutions: Next steps Assess priority actions identified by participants Share draft report for further input Develop guidelines, tools and case studies for monitoring biodiversity.   StephensonPJ@gmail.com www.speciesmonitoring.org