Review of Quench Limits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Ramesh Gupta, BNL D1 Dipole Design / IR Magnet Study LARP Collaboration Meeting, Oct 5-6, D1 Dipole Design Task (terminated in 2005) IR Magnet Study.
Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Overview of Possible LHC IR Upgrade Layouts CARE HHH-2004 Workshop CERN 8-11 November 2004 J. Strait, N.V. Mokhov, T. Sen Fermilab bnl - fnal - lbnl -
Round table magnet discussion and conclusions CARE-HHH IR’07 animated by W. Scandale and F. Zimmermann.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Muons, Inc. AAC Feb. 4, 2009 V. Kashikhin 1 Fermilab AAC  V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team Superconducting Helical Solenoids.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Tertiary Collimators in IP1/IP5 LARP Collaboration Meeting Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 5-6, 2005 Fermilab LARP Collaboration Nikolai Mokhov,
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
LARP Magnet Progress Michael Lamm For the LARP Collaboration bnl - fnal - lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program All Experimenters’ Meeting Monday,
Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova,
Joint IR Studies: Operating Margins Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program LARP Collaboration Meeting SLAC.
Protecting Superconducting Magnets from Radiation at Hadron Colliders Accelerator Magnet Technology CARE Workshop on Beam Generated Heat Deposition and.
4/27/06 1 US LHC ACCELERATOR RESEARCH PROGRAM brookhaven - fermilab – berkeley - slac US LARP Inner Triplet Cryogenics and Heat Transfer LARP Collaboration.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
IR Magnets for Muon Collider Alexander Zlobin and Vadim Kashikhin Muon Collider Physics Workshop, Fermilab November 12, 2009.
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Model magnet test results at FNAL
HL-LHC Aperture Update
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
Superconducting Helical Solenoids
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Q0 magnet, cooling, support ideas
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
Glyn Kirby Magnet AssemblyTechniques.
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Study on Thermal Deposition in the Interaction Region Magnets
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
MQYY: superconducting Quadrupole magnet for Hl-lhc
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Wednesday Summary of Working Group I
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
US-LARP Progress on IR Upgrades
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
Machine-Detector Interface
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
Tertiary Collimators in IP1/IP5: Progress Report
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Presentation transcript:

Review of Quench Limits Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center Review of Quench Limits Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011

Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov OUTLINE Tevatron Experience NbTi and Nb3Sn LHC IR Quads IR Design HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

RADIATION CONSTRAINTS AT COLLIDERS Sustain favorable background conditions in experiments. Maintain operational reliability in stores: quench stability (this talk) and dynamic heat loads on cryogenics. Prevent quenching SC magnets and damage of machine and detector components at unsynchronized beam aborts. Minimize radiation damage to components, maximize their lifetime. Minimize impact of radiation on personnel and environment: prompt and residual radiation (hands-on maintenance). HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Slow and Fast LOCAL Quench Levels in Tevatron Magnets HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Tevatron Quench Limits Tevatron: Based on measurements and analyses by H. Edwards et al (1977-1978), the following LOCAL energy deposition design limits for the Tevatron NbTi SC dipole magnets (4.4 T, I/Ic=0.9, 4.6 K) have been chosen in the Tevatron design report (1979): Slow loss (DC) 8 mW/g ( ~2 mW/g w/cryo) = 56 mW/cm3 Fast loss (1 ms) 1 mJ/g = 7 mJ/cm3 Fast loss (20 ms) 0.5 mJ/g = 3.5 mJ/cm3 Proven in 25-year Tevatron operation and numerous studies, calculations and machine improvements over that period. HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Justification of QL in 1979-1980 Beam Tests HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

LHC Cable Composition and Density NbTi cable: 90% (0.6 Cu + 0.4 NbTi) + 10% Kapton, density r = 7.0 g/cm3 quench limit (mW/cm3) = 7×quench limit (mW/g) Nb3Sn cable: 15.3% Nb3Sn + 15.3% Bronze + 36.7% Cu + 1.2% StSt + 24.4% Ceramic Insulation + 7.1% Epoxy, density r = 6.8 g/cm3 quench limit (mW/cm3) = 6.8×quench limit (mW/g) HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

LHC IR Quad Design: Local Quench Limits at I/Ic=0.8 LHC IR quads (NbTi): 1.41 mW/g (~10 mW/cm3) DC; design goal 0.47 mW/g (3.3 mW/cm3) Used since 10 years ago in design of LHC inner triplets Nb3Sn IR quads (Nb3Sn): 5.9 mW/g (40 mW/cm3) DC; design goal 1.9 mW/g (13.3 mW/cm3) Used currently in our analysis for HL-LHC HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

FNAL 250 T/m IR Quad Designs (A. Zlobin et al) NbTi Nb3Sn 70-mm bore, 15-mm wide graded cable insulated with kapton (MQXB). 90-mm bore, 15-mm wide cable insulated with thick S-2 glass epoxy. In both designs, magnet cold mass (coil, collar and yoke) is cooled with He-II at 1.9K. HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

MARS15/ANSYS Temperature Profiles HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Quench Limits at 1.9K in NbTi & Nb3Sn IR Quads Inner layer, mid-plane turns NbTi Quench limit (and corresponding magnet operation margin) for Nb3Sn is ~4 times larger than for NbTi FNAL measurements with special 2-m long NbTi quad designed to provide AC loss level and radial profile similar to those calculated for LHC IR quads. Similar measurements were performed with 90-mm Nb3Sn TQ LARP 1-m long quad with mid-plane heaters: same level of agreement between thermal model and data. HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

LHC IR Protection: Design Constraints LHC: Nominal luminosity of 1034 cm-2 s-1; HL-LHC: 5×1034 cm-2 s-1. Geometrical aperture: keep it larger than “n1 = 7” for injection and collision optics, including closed orbit and mechanical tolerances. Quench stability: keep peak power density emax (local one in mW/g, never linear loss density in p/m/s or W/m) which can be as much as an order of magnitude larger than the azimuthal average, below the quench limit with a safety margin of a factor of 3. Quench limit: 1.41 mW/g = 10 mW/cm3 (NbTi) and 5.9 mW/g = 40 mW/cm3 (Nb3Sn). Radiation damage: with the above levels, the estimated lifetime at hottest spots exceeds 7 years (LHC) and TBD (HL-LHC with Nb3Sn). Most efficient protection is inner absorbers (liners), e.g. with high-Z segments at horizontal and vertical planes, with enlarged coil aperture as a price. Other measures (absorbers in interconnect regions, low-Z inserts in the coils) might be needed, but effect on emax is modest. Dynamic heat load: keep it below ~20 W/m. Hands-on maintenance: keep residual dose rates on component outer surfaces below 0.1 mSv/hr. Engineering constraints must always be obeyed. HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov LHC IR5 MARS15 Model HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov Triplet MARS15 Model HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov Example of MARS Studies: Peak Power Density in Cable-1 at 2.5x1034 cm-2 s-1 55-mm aperture TAS LBM-2 (hybrid) SYM-1 (hybrid) 1.9 1.9 0.47 0.47 HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov

Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov Summary Local quench limit (QL) approach and values have been proven in 25-year Tevatron operation and numerous studies, calculations and machine improvements over that period. QL for NbTi of 1.41 mW/g (~10 mW/cm3) DC, with design goal of 0.47 mW/g (3.3 mW/cm3) were derived in calculations and measurements with FNAL quads and are used since 10 years ago in design and construction of inner triplet IRs of LHC. QL for Nb3Sn of 5.9 mW/g (40 mW/cm3) DC, with design goal of 1.9 mW/g (13.3 mW/cm3) were derived on the basis of thermal analysis of LARP IR quads and are currently used in our studies for HL-LHC. HL-LHC/LARP CM1 - CERN, Nov. 16-18, 2011 Quench Limits - N.V. Mokhov