EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HM and PM10 monitoring with LVS and HVS in R.Macedonia Aleksandra Nestorovska-Krsteska, MEIC, MOEPP Ministry of environment and physical planning.
Advertisements

Yoojung kim Air Pollution Modeling Lab. Dept. Environmental Engineering, Konkuk Univ. Seoul, Korea.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Chemical Coordinating Centre EMEPs contribution to a multi-purpose monitoring capasity for atmospheric composition in Europe.
Derwent R.G. et al., 1998, “Observation and interpretation of the seasonal cycles in the surface concentration of ozone and carbon monoxide at Mace Head,
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Cooperation of EMEP/CCC and EEA on near real-time air quality data. Presented by Wenche Aas Though most of the work is done by: Tim Haigh, Bernt Rondell,
/tfmm3 EMEP Chemical Coordinating Centre Measurements of particulate matter in EMEP Current implementation Kjetil Tørseth, Wenche Aas, Michael.
1 Pollutants in air, soil, and living organisms Eiliv Steinnes Department of Chemistry Norwegian University of Science and Technology NO-7491 Trondheim.
Air Quality Surveillance Branch Air Monitoring Operations l Manual and Non-criteria Samplers » Reggie Smith » Special Purpose Monitoring & Data Support.
Relevant activities in EMEP Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU) EMEP Monitoring programme Expansion to the EECCA region, HTAP QA/QC.
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC.
Bulgarian National Emission Inventory System Assoc. Prof. N.Miloshev – Geophysical Institute BAS St. Tzonev – National Statistical Institute E. Nikolova.
October Project Aims related to Monitoring and QA/QC Overall Aim To assess the quality and variety of air quality data collected across Scotland.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
EMEP Monitoring programme Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU)
Key parameters needed for Forecasting 1.All Global NWP variables (e.g., PBL + Tropopause height) and others yet to be determined by WMO/GAW, cloud top/bottom,phase,
Trend analysis of HMs and POPs on the basis of measurements and modelling data Victor Shatalov and Oleg Travnikov, MSC-E.
EMEP Monitoring Strategy Status and challenges, with main focus on the EECCA region Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris [EMEP,ACTRIS,HELCOM,CAMP and more/NILU]
European moss survey 2010/11: heavy metals, nitrogen and POPs ICP VEGETATION 30 th  Progress HM & N  New: Pilot study POPs  Review: mosses as biomonitors.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
30th WGE, September 2011Berit Kvaeven, chairwoman ICP Waters International Cooperative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring Effects of Air Pollution.
Control by existing protocols and current work under the Convention Richard Ballaman Chairman of WGSR Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape.
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
Département Surveillance de la Qualité de l’Air AIR QUALITY DATA FLOWS IN FRANCE Souad Bouallala Patrick Tisserant ADEME (French environment and Energy.
EMEP WGSR, EMEP Progress on HMs, 2006  Review and evaluation of the MSCE-HM model (TFMM)  Atmospheric pollution in 2004 (emissions, monitoring.
Sandro Fuzzi National Research Council Bologna, Italy
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
Chemical Formula Stoichiometry Review
Environmental monitoring at EARS
Harald Dovland, Ministry of Environment, Norway
Air Transport and Fate Research Partnership Meeting,
French groundwater monitoring networks
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Measuring Atmospheric N Inputs
Pollution of the atmosphere of Earth
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level
EMEP stations as part of National Monitoring System in Poland
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
Preparation of the Heavy Metals Protocol Ratification by Ukraine
Concentrations of particulate matter in France : results and key findings Olivier Le Bihan, François Mathe, Jean-Luc Houdret, Bertrand Bessagnet, Patrice.
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
EMEP Monitoring Strategy
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
Monitoring strategy, technical issues
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
MSC-E contribution concerning heavy metals
Use of non-Party estimates in EMEP modelling: HMs and POPs
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
Heavy metal emissions, measurements and needs for modelling in Croatia
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
First Approach to the EMEP Assessment Report – Slovak Republic
Implementation of the new emep monitoring strategy
Lessons learnt from the EMEP intensive measurements
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Wish list for modelling (first priority)
Wenche Aas Status of EMEP measurements today Field intercomparison
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E
Update on activities of Bulgaria within/related to EMEP
Welcome TFMM workshop on the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy Introduction to the monitoring strategy QA/QC activities of EMEP organisation.
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Presentation transcript:

EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME Implementation of the EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME with the collaboration of S. Bouallala (ADEME), P. Coddeville (EMD), P. Laj (LaMP/CNRS)

General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy A “level” approach: levels 1 and 2 = mandatory requirements level 3 = a voluntary component

General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy A “level” approach: levels 1 and 2 = mandatory requirements level 3 = a voluntary component Recommendations for each level: a suggested number of sites a list of parameters a minimum time resolution a reference methodology

General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy The French “official” EMEP network (MERA) coordinated by the ADEME (Agency for Environment and Energy Management) in place of the Ministry of Environment standard methodologies and adequate quality assurance procedures Collaborations with other programmes and researchers

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP inorganic compounds = 8 Ozone = 8 heavy metals (prec) = 4 PM (mass) = 4  A large country a lot of stations suggested

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP inorganic compounds = 8 = 9 (+1) Ozone = 8 heavy metals (prec) = 4 PM (mass) = 4 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP inorganic compounds = 8 = 9 (+1) Ozone = 8 = 8 (+1) heavy metals (prec) = 4 PM (mass) = 4 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP inorganic compounds = 8 = 9 (+1) Ozone = 8 = 8 (+1) heavy metals (prec) = 4 = 1 PM (mass) = 4 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP inorganic compounds = 8 = 9 (+1) Ozone = 8 = 8 (+1) heavy metals (prec) = 4 = 1 PM (mass) = 4 = 0 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring requirements: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring requirements: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h X 8 X 4 technical and financial difficulties

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring actual situation: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h  AbSO2 replaced by Filter packs 2 stations equiped in 2004 measurement of (NH3+NH4+) twice a week frequency

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h  Should be implemented in 2005 in 2 stations

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h Not the main issue in France, low levels Technical and cost difficulties 1 station with a 2 weeks time resolution 

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 1 (all parameters are required to be monitored) Inorganic compounds in precipitation SO4-, NO3-, NH4+, H+ (pH), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- (cond) 24h Inorganic compounds in air SO2, SO4-, NO3-, HNO3, NH4+, NH3, HCl, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Gas particle ratios NH3, NH4+, HCl, HNO3, NO3- monthly NO2 in air NO2 Ozone in air O3 1h Meteorology RR, T,dd,ff,rh, pr HMs in precipitation Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Daily/weekly PM mass in air PM2.5, PM10 1h/24h PM = 1st priority … but: gravimetric method: difficult + expensive need of NRT data (PM obs & forecasts on www.prevair.org) monitors 

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP acid and eutro = 1 photooxidant = 1 heavy metals = 1 POP = 1 Particulate matter = 1

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP acid and eutro = 1 photooxidant = 1 = 3 heavy metals = 1 POP = 1 Particulate matter = 1 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP acid and eutro = 1 photooxidant = 1 = 3 heavy metals = 1 = 1 POP = 1 Particulate matter = 1 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP acid and eutro = 1 = 0 photooxidant = 1 = 3 heavy metals = 1 = 1 POP = 1 = 0 Particulate matter = 1 = 0 actual number IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Monitoring requirements PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 2: acidification and eutrophication “super-site” (in addition to level 1) gas particle ratio NH3/NH4, HNO3/NO3 1h/24h Ammonia in emission areas NH3 monthly Core sites level 2: photochemical oxidants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) NOx NO, NO2 1h Light hydrocarbons C2-C7 1h/twice a week carbonyls Aldehydes and ketones 8 hourly twice a week Core sites level 2: Heavy metals “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Mercury in precipitation Hg weekly Mercury in air 1h/daily HMs in air Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Monitoring requirements Core sites level 2; Persistant organic pollutants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) POPs in precip. PAH, PCB, HCB, chlordane, a-HCH, DDT/DDE weekly POPs in air daily/weekly Core sites level 2; Particulate matter “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Major inorganics in both PM2.5 and PM10 SO4, NO3, NH4, Na, K, Ca, Mg (Cl) 1h/daily Mineral dust in PM10 Si Daily/weekly Elemental and organic carbon EC, OC

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Monitoring actual situation PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 2: acidification and eutrophication “super-site” (in addition to level 1) gas particle ratio NH3/NH4, HNO3/NO3 1h/24h Ammonia in emission areas NH3 monthly Core sites level 2: photochemical oxidants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) NOx NO, NO2 1h Light hydrocarbons C2-C7 1h/twice a week carbonyls Aldehydes and ketones 8 hourly twice a week Core sites level 2: Heavy metals “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Mercury in precipitation Hg weekly Mercury in air 1h/daily HMs in air Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Monitoring actual situation Core sites level 2; Persistant organic pollutants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) POPs in precip. PAH, PCB, HCB, chlordane, a-HCH, DDT/DDE weekly POPs in air daily/weekly Core sites level 2; Particulate matter “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Major inorganics in both PM2.5 and PM10 SO4, NO3, NH4, Na, K, Ca, Mg (Cl) 1h/daily Mineral dust in PM10 Si Daily/weekly Elemental and organic carbon EC, OC

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 2: acidification and eutrophication “super-site” (in addition to level 1) gas particle ratio NH3/NH4, HNO3/NO3 1h/24h Ammonia in emission areas NH3 monthly Core sites level 2: photochemical oxidants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) NOx NO, NO2 1h Light hydrocarbons C2-C7 1h/twice a week carbonyls Aldehydes and ketones 8 hourly twice a week Core sites level 2: Heavy metals “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Mercury in precipitation Hg weekly Mercury in air 1h/daily HMs in air Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Monitoring needs Core sites level 2: Persistant organic pollutants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) POPs in precip. PAH, PCB, HCB, chlordane, a-HCH, DDT/DDE weekly POPs in air daily/weekly Core sites level 2: Particulate matter “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Major inorganics in both PM2.5 and PM10 SO4, NO3, NH4, Na, K, Ca, Mg (Cl) 1h/daily Mineral dust in PM10 Si Daily/weekly Elemental and organic carbon EC, OC

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 2: acidification and eutrophication “super-site” (in addition to level 1) gas particle ratio NH3/NH4, HNO3/NO3 1h/24h Ammonia in emission areas NH3 monthly Core sites level 2: photochemical oxidants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) NOx NO, NO2 1h Light hydrocarbons C2-C7 1h/twice a week carbonyls Aldehydes and ketones 8 hourly twice a week Core sites level 2: Heavy metals “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Mercury in precipitation Hg weekly Mercury in air 1h/daily HMs in air Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri)  Monitoring needs will be implemented in 2005 Core sites level 2: Persistant organic pollutants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) POPs in precip. PAH, PCB, HCB, chlordane, a-HCH, DDT/DDE weekly POPs in air daily/weekly Core sites level 2: Particulate matter “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Major inorganics in both PM2.5 and PM10 SO4, NO3, NH4, Na, K, Ca, Mg (Cl) 1h/daily Mineral dust in PM10 Si Daily/weekly Elemental and organic carbon EC, OC

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 2: acidification and eutrophication “super-site” (in addition to level 1) gas particle ratio NH3/NH4, HNO3/NO3 1h/24h Ammonia in emission areas NH3 monthly Core sites level 2: photochemical oxidants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) NOx NO, NO2 1h Light hydrocarbons C2-C7 1h/twice a week carbonyls Aldehydes and ketones 8 hourly twice a week Core sites level 2: Heavy metals “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Mercury in precipitation Hg weekly Mercury in air 1h/daily HMs in air Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri)  denuder-filterpack tested: difficult to apply expensive Monitoring needs Core sites level 2: Persistant organic pollutants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) POPs in precip. PAH, PCB, HCB, chlordane, a-HCH, DDT/DDE weekly POPs in air daily/weekly Core sites level 2: Particulate matter “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Major inorganics in both PM2.5 and PM10 SO4, NO3, NH4, Na, K, Ca, Mg (Cl) 1h/daily Mineral dust in PM10 Si Daily/weekly Elemental and organic carbon EC, OC

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites PROGRAMME PARAMETERS time resolution Core sites level 2: acidification and eutrophication “super-site” (in addition to level 1) gas particle ratio NH3/NH4, HNO3/NO3 1h/24h Ammonia in emission areas NH3 monthly Core sites level 2: photochemical oxidants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) NOx NO, NO2 1h Light hydrocarbons C2-C7 1h/twice a week carbonyls Aldehydes and ketones 8 hourly twice a week Core sites level 2: Heavy metals “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Mercury in precipitation Hg weekly Mercury in air 1h/daily HMs in air Cd, Pb (1st pri.), Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni (2nd pri) Monitoring needs technical and financial difficulties  Core sites level 2: Persistant organic pollutants “super-site” (in addition to level 1) POPs in precip. PAH, PCB, HCB, chlordane, a-HCH, DDT/DDE weekly POPs in air daily/weekly Core sites level 2: Particulate matter “super-site” (in addition to level 1) Major inorganics in both PM2.5 and PM10 SO4, NO3, NH4, Na, K, Ca, Mg (Cl) 1h/daily Mineral dust in PM10 Si Daily/weekly Elemental and organic carbon EC, OC

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 3 sites Parameters suggested to be monitored: dry deposition flux of S and N species dry deposition flux of O3 hydrocarbons C6-C12 (C6-C9) NOy chemistry speciation of OC BC measurements particle size/number distribution aerosol optical depth vertical profiles of O3 and aerosols Hg speciation congener-specific POPs multi-compartment POPs and Hg

The EMEP ”level” approach: level 3 sites Parameters already measured in French EMEP stations: dry deposition flux of S and N species dry deposition flux of O3 hydrocarbons C6-C12 (C6-C9) NOy chemistry speciation of OC BC measurements particle size/number distribution aerosol optical depth vertical profiles of O3 and aerosols Hg speciation congener-specific POPs multi-compartment POPs and Hg IRATY (1 300 m) MONTANDON (836 m) DONON (775 m) REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) MONFRANC (810 m) MORVAN (620 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m)

General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy The EMEP new strategy for France is extremely ambitious (many sites and super-sites) The French “official” EMEP network (MERA) a lot is already done or will be done in a near future impossible to meet all the requirements (too much human and financial ressources) Collaborations with other programmes and researchers

General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy The EMEP new strategy for France is extremely ambitious (many sites and super-sites) The French “official” EMEP network (MERA) a lot is already done or will be done in a near future impossible to meet all the requirements (too much human and financial ressources) Collaborations with other programmes and researchers

Collaborations with other programmes and researchers PAES research programme (CNRS/ADEME) dry deposition flux of S and N species dry deposition flux of O3 hydrocarbons C6-C12 (C6-C9) NOy chemistry speciation of OC BC measurements particle size/number distribution aerosol optical depth vertical profiles of O3 and aerosols Hg speciation congener-specific POPs multi-compartment POPs and Hg + O3, PM mass, meteo PIC DU MIDI (2877m) DONON (775 m) PUYS DE DOME (1465m) PAES

Collaborations with other programmes and researchers French contributions to international programmes GAW OSPAR ... GAW OSPAR