The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
Advertisements

Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.
PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
Evaluating Loftus (1979) ‘The weapon effect’
EWT Other Factors that Affect EWT. BARTLETT AND THE EFFECT OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY. War of the Ghosts Anybody?
EWT
LOFTUS & PALMER (1974) Starter: Here is an introduction to Loftus & Palmer (1974)…what information is missing…  Loftus carried out an experiment where.
Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.
Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
Eye-witness testimony
LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.
Thanks for the Memories! Gabby Feltner and Caroline Vierod.
EWT and Anxiety. How will I know if I am learning? By the end of the lesson… E Will be able to define weapon focus. C Will be able to explain how anxiety.
EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY. WHAT IS EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY? Question – write your answer on your mini-whiteboards – What is an Eyewitness Testimony? AQA Definition:
Contents Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Cognitive Psychology - Loftus and Palmer.
Reliability of one cognitive process
AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.
NEY T i. Factors affecting eyewitness testimony: misleading information “Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: misleading information.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
Evaluate, including the relative strengths and weaknesses, of Field experiments including their use in criminological psychology with regard to : Evaluate,
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.
Loftus and Palmer (1974).  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory  Field of psychology:
Memory Bingo! HypothesisIndependent variable Dependent variable Weapon focusDecaySensory store CapacityEncodingPeterson and Peterson LoftusCentral ExecutivePhonological.
Pop Quiz Define the following key terms: Social rolesUnanimity Agentic state Authoritarian personality Locus of Control Minority influence CodingCapacity.
Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
How reliable is your memory? PART 2
Loftus and Palmer Study one Study two Aim Reconstructive memory is….
MEMORY FALLIBLITY OF MEMORY.
Multiple choice questions
The effect of the expert witness on jury perception of EWT
Cognitive Psychology PSYA1 Revision.
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
Lesson objectives Starter: Identifing different types of validity
Cognitive Interview.
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge
RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting.
Cognitive Psychology Memory
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
1. Post-event information
Starter: how good is your memory?
Answers June 2017 AS.
Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Interviewing witnesses
what have we learned from past two lessons?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Sour Nice Candy Honey Pie Toffee Taste Cake Tooth Tart Sugar Pop
The Bugs Bunny Effect
L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.
The cognitive area.
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
G © Copyright The PiXL Club Ltd, 2017.
Natural and Field experiments
Starter Create a mind map with EWT placed in the middle, I would like you to write down all the things you have learned this lesson about EWT.
Memory.
Presentation transcript:

The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony L.O: To know the outline of 2 studies into the effect of anxiety on EWT. To understand what they show. To be able to compare them by methodology

1. Loftus and Palmer 1974 35 participants 45 participants

2. Loftus and Palmer 1974 how did they retrieve ps responses Questionnaire Interview Video feedback

3. Loftus and Palmer 1974 what was the ‘critical question’ about? The stop sign The speed of the car The barn

4. Loftus and Palmer 1974 fastest estimate Approx 61 mph Approx 51 mph Approx 41 mph

5. Loftus and Palmer 1974 slowest estimate Approx 10 mph Approx 20 mph Approx 30 mph

6. Loftus and Palmer 1974 type of experiment lab field natural

7. Loftus 1975 what was the control group asked? How fast was the white sports car going when it was travelling along the country road? How fast was the white sports car going when it passed the stop sign whilst travelling along the country road? How fast was the white sports car going when it passed the barn whilst travelling along the country road?

8. Loftus 1975 what was the experimental group asked? How fast was the white sports car going when it was travelling along the country road? How fast was the white sports car going when it passed the stop sign whilst travelling along the country road? How fast was the white sports car going when it passed the barn whilst travelling along the country road?

9. Loftus 1975 % in the experimental group who reported seeing a barn? 14% 18% 17%

10. Loftus 1975 type of experiment lab field natural

What role does Anxiety play in EWT? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmskTb ZIAms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc36eI2J AYI

Do you think anxiety would improve or impair recall?

Contradictory Evidence! Johnson and Scott (77) The Weapon Effect Christianson and Hubinette (1993) Real Life Robberies Read the studies and identify the features.

Anxiety: Anxiety leads to decreased accuracy... Loftus Lab experiment More anxiety=less accurate recall Anxiety leads to increased accuracy... Christianson and Hubinette (1993) 110 people, 22 real bank robberies! Greatest anxiety=most detailed recall.

Explain the solution to the contradiction

AO3 Discussions/Evaluation Loftus Weapon Effect Lab Experiment Christianson and Hubinette Natural Experiment

Anxiety and EWT: Comparing the two studies... Loftus’ Weapon Effect Christianson and Hubinette (1993) Ecological validity Ethics Consequentiality

Outline and Evaluate research into how anxiety can influence the accuracy of EWT (16 Marks) AO1- Johnson and Scott 1977 (Weapon Effect) AO1- Christian and Hubinette 1993 (real-life robberies) Aim: Aim: Procedure Procedure Findings Findings Conclusions Conclusions AO3 P E L Ecological Validity Which is higher in the two studies and why? Why is this an issue? On the other hand, high ecological validity can lead to low internal validity. Explain why. Consequentiality Which is more likely to fall foul to this issue and which is not? What are the real life implications of an issue such as this when getting testimony from witnesses? Ethics Which is the most unethical and why?

Picking out of a line up... Pick the bomber... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EpYlKa BM8&feature=related

1. EWT stands for… Everyone’s worst testimony Ear witness testimony Eye witness testimony

2. A major researcher in this area is… Annabel Loftus Elizabeth Loftus Eleanor Loftus

5. Loftus (1975) found out that… Participant’s recollections of a car crash were influenced by the wording of subsequent questions Participant’s recollections of a bank robbery were influenced by the wording of subsequent questions Participant’s recollections of a car crash were influenced by the wording of pre-experimental questions

6. The variables of the Loftus(1975) were as follows… IV The different verb used for the question ‘How fast was the car going?’ DV-reported speed IV- The different verb used for the question ‘How fast was the car going?’ DV-whether they said ‘yes’ to-’was there any broken glass?’ IV- Reported speed DV-The different verb used for the question ‘How fast was the car going?’ reported speed

7. The variables of the Loftus & Palmer study (1974) were as follows… IV The different verb used for the question ‘How fast was the car going?’ DV-reported speed IV- The different verb used for the question ‘How fast was the car going?’ DV-whether they said ‘yes’ to-’was there any broken glass?’ IV- Reported speed DV-The different verb used for the question ‘How fast was the car going?’ reported speed

8. How may a weapon affect EWT… Make it less reliable due to anxiety Make it less reliable due to distraction of the weapon Both of the above

1. Which of these is not a factor that would affect EWT… Questions given by the investigator The actions of the people involved in the event The eye witnesses previous experiences and knoweldge

‘Explain why a jury may not be totally confident in the evidence provided by eye witnesses of an event’ 12 Marks