The UMBRA Eight-Step Benefit-Risk Framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ClASS DEBRIEF SESSIONS PROVIDING EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK.
Advertisements

Better Regulation workshop on Rate of Return Guidelines
1 Market Based Instruments Survey and Assessment Framework Ben Henderson and Kate Norris The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Introduction to RIA and the Regulatory Governance Cycle. Improving the Design and Evaluation of Regulation and the Use of Regulatory Impact Analysis Israel.
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CRITICAL ANALYSIS IN ASSESSMENT.
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
Geotechnical & Civil Engineering Studies Future Circular Colliders (FCC)
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Systematic Review: Interpreting Results and Identifying Gaps October 17, 2012.
5. Presentación general de la iniciativa REDD+ SES 5. Presentation of the REDD+ SES Initiative.
Assessments PHASED ASSESSMENTS Assessments. Phased Assessments.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
An Overview on Risk Management
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
STEP INto Healthcare Programme
Scrutiny of RIAs Problem Definition and Objectives
Regulatory agency and pharmaceutical company responses mapped to the 10 Quality Decision Making Practices (n=76) Legend Best practice Needs improvement.
Research methodology.
Patient Involvement in the HTA Decision Making Process
Risk Communication in Medicines
Understand the principles of change management
The Quality of an Emission Inventory
Understand the principles of effective decision making
% CIRS BRAT Benefit-Risk Tool Past 5 years
Comparing the registration to reimbursement pathway for new active substances in Europe Germany Poland To help provide a better understanding of the European.
Cumulative Effects Assessment and Marine Spatial Planning
Planning the Audit Engagement: key ingredients
Working Group Five Indicators and Measurement: demonstrating and improving impact After deliberating the definition of "success" for a transparency regime,
of these basic elements
Goals and documentation of quality decision-making practices
What do we need to learn about the Key Element?
Scientific competence Communication and transparency
Social work and Personalisation Delivering personalisation through
Comparing the registration to reimbursement pathway for new active substances in Europe Germany Poland To help provide a better understanding of the European.
Regulatory Responses (n=11) Company Responses (n=20)
Type and impact of HTA-related scientific advice given during development The variability in HTA organisations and methodologies that are utilised in HTA.
Building quality in HTA process and decision making
Communicating about Risks
CIS workshop : assessment of the ecological status.
Regulatory Responses (n=11) Company Responses (n=20)
NACDEP Annual Conference, June 11, 2018
The slide shows the seven key steps that make up a systematic approach to benefit-risk assessment for medicines. Source: The CIRS Benefit-Risk Research.
WP4 Proposed Structure of the Outcome “Tool Kit and Recommendations”
Adapted from a presentation at the Rwanda First National Workshop on
Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference
Options Appraisal Once you have gathered lots of potential ideas and solutions to your issue or challenge it is important that you use a sound methodology.
Workshop 1: PROJECT EVALUATION
Objectives To outline key principles underpinning BUE’s approach to staff recruitment To outline roles and responsibilities of the recruitment panel.
CIS workshop : assessment of the ecological status.
Preliminary Judgement of Impacts
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
OSH COMMITTEES IN SPAIN AND EUROPE
Focus ELD Standards 1 Exchanging information and ideas with others through oral collaborative conversations on a range of social and academic topics. 3.
Assessment of quality decision making in regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies with QoDoS (Quality of Decision Making Orientation Scheme) Not.
Assessment of current management plan (EoH Tool 5)
Spec Framework Decision Process Alternatives
Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA)
Enhanced transparency framework and examples of flexibilities
And now the Framework WP4.
Table 1. Most effective strategies to teach students to communicate the benefits and risks of medicines Strategy Considered most effective, %
PIR CHANGES.
2019 CIRS survey: Methodologies to improve decision-making documentation during medicines development and review – gap analysis Do you think your current.
STEP INto Healthcare Programme
Waikato Economic Joint Venture Project Overview
Presentation transcript:

The UMBRA Eight-Step Benefit-Risk Framework Framing the decision Step 1: Decision Context Identifying benefits and risks Step 2: Building the Value Tree Step 3: Refining the Value Tree Step 4: Relative Importance of Benefit and Risks Assessing benefits and risks Step 5: Evaluating the Options Step 6: Evaluating Uncertainty The slide shows the common elements of the UMBRA eight-step Benefit-Risk Framework that make up a systematic approach to benefit-risk assessment for medicines. At the 2012 CIRS annual Benefit-Risk Workshop 20-21 June (http://www.cirsci.org/system/files/private/CIRS_June_2012_Workshop_Synopsis.pdf) there was a consensus from those who are developing benefit risk methodologies for assessing medicines that there are four key stages namely Framing the decision; Identifying the benefits and risks; Assessing the benefits and risks and Providing interpretation and recommendation. Underpinning these was an overarching eight-step framework Decision context; Building the Value Tree; Value Tree refinement; Assessing relative importance; Evaluating options; Evaluating uncertainty; Concise presentation of results – visualisation and Final recommendation. All the methodologies currently being developed by regulators and companies have these steps whether they are explicitly or implicitly undertaken. The UMBRA overarching framework therefore, provides the basis for a common agreement on the principles for benefit-risk assessment of medicines. Step 7: Concise Presentation of Results (Visualisation) Step 8: Expert Judgement and Communication Interpretation and recommendations