Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Passenger Rail Presentation Transportation Finance Advisory Committee presented by: Mn/DOTs Passenger Rail Office May 18, 2012.
Advertisements

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan February 2010 presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation and Cambridge.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
First Statewide Comprehensive Rail Plan for MN Commissioned by 2008 Legislature Compliant with 2008 PRIIA Federal Rules 6 Months to prepare, 10 Months.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Section 209 Activity Report September 12, 2011 Federal Railroad Administration.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
Passenger Rail – Plan & Opportunities Engineer Contractor Conference Middleton, WI January 21, 2010.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
WELCOME ! 2011 Indiana State Rail Plan. Why is INDOT Completing a State Rail Plan? Provide guidance for future freight, passenger rail planning, investments,
1 SCORT 2010 September 21, 2010 David Valenstein Federal Railroad Administration State Rail Planning.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
HSRD Systems Diagram Ten FRA Criteria 1.Ridership Forecasts: Calculated using a logit model that incorporates the reliability, cost, and travel time of.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
M IAMI F ORT L AUDERDALE W EST P ALM B EACH O RLANDO Addresses Florida’s demand for express, intercity rail travel. Is designed to serve tourists, business.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
o The Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT), in conjunction with the Wyoming Business Council, is developing a Statewide Rail Plan (SRP). o The.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
Midwest High Speed Rail Case StudySeptember 29th, 2004 Andy Inserra, Kristin Thompson, T.J. Thurlow, Natalie Villwock.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Corridor Electrification Environmental Process SVLG Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
April 29,  Investment in new and improved services, with a strong focus on customer experience  Investment focused on improving efficiency  Shorter.
Northern Lights Express High Speed Rail: MN APA Conference September 2011.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March 15, 2011.
May 25, 2010 Wisconsin High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail From vision to reality MADISON COMMUNITY MEETING John Oimoen, High Speed Passenger Rail Program.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
September 19 & 20, 2007 Items 4.11a,b, & c Tabs 15, 16, & 17 Proposition 1B Intercity Rail Bond Program.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
Oregon Passenger Rail Leadership Council Meeting June 6, 2012.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
SCORT PRESENTATION CURRENT PASSENGER RAIL INITIATIVES MARCH 15, 2011 MARK IMHOFF, DIVISION DIRECTOR Colorado Department of Transportation Division of Transit.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #5 MARCH 12 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM Northern Service Center.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting November 8, 2005?? Item No. xx Supp. Meeting Date:
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance December 16, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Colfax Corridor Connections (Denver) & 15/15L Transit Priority Study (RTD) RTD Board - Planning & Development Committee August 6, 2013.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
Regional Roads Committee
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Michigan Update Michigan Association of Rail Passengers
HSR Crossing Safety Update Elliot A
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Complete Streets: Making Connections
Ohio Rail Development Commission November 15, 2017 Meeting
Capital Programming Committee South Coast Rail Phase 1 Service
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Environment Committee November 29, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha Regional Passenger Rail Planning Study Add date here

What is the study? The Iowa Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)and Illinois Department of Transportation, is studying the feasibility of expanding existing passenger rail service and developing a new regional passenger rail service from Chicago, Ill., to Council Bluffs, Iowa, and Omaha, Neb. This study will be a major step in assessing the viability of a regional intercity passenger rail system serving Iowa and the Midwest through this corridor.

Purpose of the study The purpose of this study is to: Evaluate potential route alternatives. Evaluate levels of service and ridership. Analyze environmental impacts. Determine a preferred Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha passenger rail route alternative for regional intercity passenger rail service.

Study costs Overall cost of the planning study: $2 million Costs are allocated between the State of Iowa and FRA. Implementation costs will be identified during the study.

Collaboration – collecting input Right now, during the planning and study phase of the project, the FRA and Iowa DOT are collecting input from federal, state and local agencies along with communities and other interested individuals, and the railroad companies that may host the passenger service.

Collaboration – between states Iowa and Illinois DOTs have a strong partnership to study and evaluate the potential Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha regional passenger rail service.

Collaboration – rail groups The Midwest High-Speed Rail Steering Group, representing nine Midwestern states, executed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2009 supporting Midwest routes connecting to the Chicago hub. Add local rail groups if applicable

Route evaluation This study is the first step toward evaluating potential route alternatives between Chicago and Council Bluffs-Omaha for their: Costs of construction and operation. Travel times. Population and urban areas served. Ridership and revenue potential. Environmental impacts.

Routes under consideration Need legend here

Service goals Once a preferred passenger rail route is identified: The number of round-trips will be determined by comparing ridership and revenue forecasts to construction and operating costs. The mileage and trip duration will be determined. All route alternatives being reviewed are approximately 500 miles long.

Service goals The final speed will be determined by assessing how higher speeds might improve demand for the passenger service versus the costs to obtain higher speeds. The study is based on initial maximum speeds of 79 to 90, or 110 mph. The estimated cost for a round-trip ticket will be determined. To provide a reference, a typical fare for the 300-mile trip between Chicago and St. Louis ranges from $48 to $104 per person.

Public and economic benefits It is anticipated that if the project is implemented it will: Help create jobs. Improve our nation’s transportation infrastructure, which is used for both freight and passenger transportation. Assist in providing transportation alternatives to the citizens of Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska.

Public and economic benefits It is anticipated that if the project is implemented it will: Generate business revenues within Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska, including: Materials supply (steel, fuel). Services (housing, food, utility). These numbers will be forecast during the study using standardized methods approved by the federal government. Encourage transit-oriented development.

Public and economic benefits It is anticipated that if the project is implemented it will: Provide upgrades to highway-railroad crossings, including improved grade-crossing signal systems that will improve motorist and railroad safety. Provide reliable, all-weather transportation to travelers between Chicago and Council Bluffs- Omaha.

Environmental benefits It is anticipated that this project will: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Contribute to fuel savings. Reduce vehicle miles traveled by automobiles. Reduce highway congestion. Incorporate Iowa and Illinois DOTs’ “GreenLine” vision – a program advancing innovative, sustainable practices.

What is happening now? As part of the study, development is in process for the following documents. Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Service Development Plan (SDP)

Tier 1 EIS A Tier 1 EIS is a corridor-wide, broad or “service level” environmental document used to: Evaluate potential route alternatives. Determine preferred route alternative. Identify cities for potential station stops. Prepare draft EIS and obtain public and agency input. Identify future “project level” (Tier 2) environmental studies.

Tier 1 EIS Environmental impact analysis, including: Compile geographic information system database of environmental resources. Evaluate feasible route alternatives. Corridor-level environmental impact analysis (wetlands, waterways, regulated materials, historical properties, protected resources, threatened and endangered species and environmental justice). Noise and vibration analysis. Energy consumption analysis.

SDP The Service Development Plan is a document that lays out the overall scope and approach for the proposed service.

Tier 1 EIS and SDP timing The Tier 1 EIS and related SDP will require approximately 18 months to complete. Completing these elements will result in the selection of a preferred route alternative and initial definition of the potential passenger rail service.

Tier 1 EIS Public involvement schedule

Following Tier 1 EIS and SDP If the State of Iowa decides to move ahead with implementing the project and if funding for implementation and operation is established, Tier 2 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) studies (project-specific study for one or more sections of the preferred route) will need to be completed.

Following Tier 1 EIS After any project-specific Tier 2 NEPA studies are completed and a final service design of the Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha passenger service is determined, the next steps are: Infrastructure construction Equipment procurement Operations

Provide your input to the study Log on to www.iowadot.gov/chicagotoomaha/ Call the hotline at 800-488-7119 Send an email to email@chicagotoomaha.com Attend an in-person or online, open house meeting