Jurga Arustiene, Lithuanian Geological Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Advertisements

1 Prevention and Remediation In Selected Industrial Sectors: Small Sites in Urban Areas Athens, Greece June 3-5, 2006 NATO/CCMS PILOT STUDY.
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
St. Johns River Water Supply Impact Study by Getachew Belaineh Ph. D., P.H. 1 Brian McGurk P.G. 1 Louis Motz Ph. D., P.E 2 Follow up Review meeting March,
Is it worth decontaminating groundwater ? Lessons from a cost benefit analysis in a French case study Stéphanie Aulong and Jean-Daniel Rinaudo Economic.
Geological Survey of Slovenia Characteristics of geothermal potential, current utilization and its future (challenges) in Slovenia Andrej Lapanje, Nina.
| Slide 1 Establishing Threshold Values for Groundwater Johannes Grath Andreas Scheidleder 26 June 2007.
The phased approach to the groundwater monitoring programme for the Drini River Basin.
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities environmental objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 S.I. 9. of 2010 Colin Byrne Water Inspector.
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
JOHN ILIMA MSCIV (Candidate) College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology MAKERERE UNIVERSITY- KAMPALA.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
GROUND WATER MONITORING TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY Mike Trojan Erin Eid Jennifer Maloney Jim Stockinger Minnesota Pollution Control.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Remco van Ek Saltwater intrusion in the Netherlands in relation to the WFD Seminar on Ground- and surface water monitoring Smardzewice,
Sign env. Risk Human uses What is the (weighted) extent of exceedance of a GW-QS or criteria’s value in a GWB? Further assessments verify GWB is of good.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Horizontal Guidance on Water Bodies.
A Saltwater Upconing Model to Evaluate Wellfield Feasibility Gregory W. Council Christopher J. Richards June 2008 Salt Water Intrusion Meeting (SWIM) Naples,
Aquifers of the Scheldt basin Testing the guidance document WATECO & IMPRESS groups Gabrielle Bouleau (ENGREF) & Arnaud Courtecuisse (AEAP)
Groundwater bodies, chemical characterisation and monitoring for the Water Framework Directive C.R. Meinardi, RIVM.
| Slide 1 Chemical Status Assessment 9:00 – 11:00 3 July 2007.
TRANSBOUNDARY GROUNDWATER ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND THEIR RESOLUTION IN ROMANIA Dr. eng. Mihai BRETOTEAN HEAD OF GROUNDWATER DEPARTMENT NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
National Administration “Apele Romane”
Recommendations for the management and monitoring
GEF Project Integrated Natural Resources Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystems UNESCO Project Output 1.3 Groundwater resources assessment.
Threshold values - revisited
CLIMATE - HYDROGEOLOGY
Groundwater Dependent Terrestrial Ecosystems…
Type of presentation/visualisation
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
GWB Visualisation – GIS
The EU WATER POLICY.
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Groundwater area protection plans in water management
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR THE WFD UK approach
GWB delineation in Finland
Expert Advisory Forum on
The inventory of Finnish groundwater resources
WGC-2 DG Meeting Towards a Guidance on Groundwater Chemical Status and Threshold Values 14:00 – 16:00 21 April 2008 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
V G 222nd Working Group C Plenary Meeting March 2012 Groundwater bodies delineation in France Susanne Schomburgk, BRGM, Water Division
at Umweltbundesamt GmbH Wien
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Germany
Draft topic report on WS&D aspects in a selection of EU RBMPs
GWDTE Threshold Value development in UK
Proposal for Visualisation of Groundwater Bodies
Umweltbundesamt, Austria
Garrett Kilroy EPA Research Fellow Shannon PRB
WGC - GROUP 2 PROTECTED AREAS
Kestutis Kadunas & Juozas Mockevicius Geological Survey of Lithuania
Deriving groundwater quality thresholds in the Vouga river basin (Portugal) applying BRIDGE methodology M. T. Condesso Melo, C. M. Ordens, C. Sena, M.
Drought in Sweden Jenny McCarthy WG Groundwater, Vienna.
Juhani Gustafsson, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
Characterisation of groundwater bodies in the Scheldt pilot river basin district Ph. Meus* ICS-SCALDIT, P08 « Groundwater » * Ministère.
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Drinking Water Protected Areas: Luxembourg Experiences
32nd CIS Groundwater Working Group Meeting, Malta
Lærke Thorling and Klaus Hinsby
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Good groundwater chemical status
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Jurga Arustiene, Lithuanian Geological Survey Assessment of chemical status in fresh/salt groundwater transition zones - Lithuania Jurga Arustiene, Lithuanian Geological Survey

Groundwater bodies Upper Devonian Stipinai (1), Kėdainiai-Dotnuva (2) and Suvalkija (3) located in central part of Nemunas RBD Main reason for delineation of these groundwater bodies is fresh/salt groundwater transition zones, which naturally occurs in aquifers used for drinking water supply. The historical data indicates that groundwater abstraction in fresh/salt water transition zones is risky because it can disturb the natural equilibrium existing in not-pumped aquifers and could deteriorate groundwater quality

The abnormally high concentrations of two problematic indicators - sulphates and chlorides, exceeding TV’s set in drinking water standard, are observed in part of the wellfields: Upper Devonian Stipinai (1) – 24%, Kėdainiai- Dotnuva (2) – 42% and Suvalkija (3) – 76%. Chemical and quantitative status of these groundwater bodies was assessed as good, but they were identified as groundwater bodies potentially at risk. As there was lack of data in order to access trends in groundwater quality, program of measures foresaw operational monitoring of problematic quality indicators in all wellfields.

Pressures In Nemunas river district 3 groundwater bodies were identified as potentially at risk due to same reason – occurrence of fresh/salt groundwater transition zones and possible risk of groundwater quality deterioration due to groundwater abstraction -  but situation in each of groundwater body is different and has to be assessed separately. Taking into account natural background levels of sulphates and chlorides TVs for chemical status assessment were set higher than drinking water standard - 500 mg/l and 350 mg/l.

Upper Devonian Stipinai groundwater body Groundwater body is comprised from Quaternary, Permian and upper Devonian aquifers. Upper Devonian Stipinai aquifer is main aquifer used for drinking water supply. Current groundwater abstraction rate is low, makes 14% from available groundwater resources. Due to irregular distribution of gypsum layers within this aquifer high concentrations of sulphates are observed in part of wellfields (24%)

Historical monitoring data from one of the largest wellfield (Bubiai) located within groundwater body, indicate impact of groundwater abstraction to groundwater quality. During the period of the most intensive groundwater abstraction average concentration of sulphates increased from 120 mg/l in 1970 to 310 mg/l in 1999, currently, due to groundwater abstraction decrease, concentrations of sulphates are stable ~ 280 mg/l. Same situation – stable concentrations of sulphates - is observed within entire groundwater body.

Kėdainiai-Dotnuva groundwater body was delineated in the periphery of Upper-Middle Devonian aquifer system. Groundwater body is comprised of 2 different aquifers of Upper Devonian and main productive aquifer of Upper-Middle Devonian. Only the upper part of this thick groundwater system contains fresh water.

Groundwater abstraction rate from this groundwater body is moderate - makes 27% from available groundwater resources. Special evaluation was made for a biggest wellfield of Kedainiai. Estimated salt water input into the budget from below is 16–23 %, and from above, 13–20 %. These inputs regulate Cl and SO4 trends. Production wells, installed in the middle part of this aquifer system already provide groundwater with concentrations of Cl and SO4 close to TV values. Groundwater quality in the upper part of the exploited aquifer system was and is good and resources are enough to ensure drinking water need for a nearest future.

Suvalkija GWB Groundwater body Suvalkija was delineated in the part of Upper-Middle Cretaceous system, where anomalies of chlorides occur. In the areas of faulty zones, the most often in river valleys, salt water ascends from deeper aquifers, resulting high concentration of chlorides. Wellfields, where average concentration of chlorides exceeds drinking water standard (250 mg/l) makes 76 %. As current groundwater abstraction rate is low – 12 % from available groundwater resources, monitoring data indicates some decrease of chlorides.

Measures As there was lack of data in order to access trends in groundwater quality, program of measures foresaw operational monitoring of problematic quality indicators in all wellfields, extracting more than 10 m3/day located in groundwater bodies at risk and now is carried out from 2013 and is foreseen till the end of the 2nd Nemunas RBD management plan. Currently, with no evidence of groundwater quality deterioration within entire groundwater bodies at risk, groundwater quality in wellfields is considered as drinking water supply issue, even if increase of sulphates and/or chlorides are observed.

Justification for applying Article 4(4) or 4(5) WFD Articles 4(4) or 4(5) are not currently applied, but if groundwater abstraction will increase in the future it could be case. Due to complicated hydrogeological conditions of wellfields located close or within fresh/salt groundwater transition zones prevention of groundwater quality from deterioration could be challenging.

Conclusions and lessons learned The five-year period of groundwater monitoring was not enough to decide if risk of groundwater quality deterioration due to groundwater abstraction exists. One of the reason is current groundwater abstraction rate, which makes only 12-27% of available groundwater resources. Each groundwater body due to different hydrogeological and economic conditions is unique and should be assessed separately. Dual standards are applied to the wellfields in fresh/salt groundwater transition zones, because TV’s of sulphates and chlorides were set based on NBL’s and are higher than TV’s for drinking water standard. This makes confusion when representing data to public. Currently going on projects of drinking water infrastructure development not always count natural hydrogeological conditions.