Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

A battery-free microorigami robotic arm.

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Soft robotic VAD concept.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Fluorescence-based in vivo imaging of MSP.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Fabrication of bilayer actuator composed of a hygroscopically active layer with aligned nanofibers and an inactive layer. Fabrication of bilayer actuator.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Demonstration of aerial-aquatic locomotion and transition.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Gripper that grasps autonomously.

Power-free sterilization of culture plate.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Details of the soft, bistable valve.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.

Experimental setup for HIL Bayesian optimization.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. (A)

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Photographs of the device in diastole (A) and in systole (B). Ultrasound images of the septal anchor and brace bar assembly in vivo: (C) the device in diastole and (D) the device in systole. (E to G) Aortic flow, LV, and LA pressure profiles of the LV device at baseline, at HF, and with the device actuating after 5 min of continuous operation. Christopher J. Payne et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan6736 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works