Impacts on CMAQ Peak Ozone Predictions from using Different BEIS Biogenic Emissions Options April 22, 2019.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.

Advertisements

Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of CMAQ with FAQS Episode of August 11 th -20 th, 2000 Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Maudood Khan and Armistead.

Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.

Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.

GEOS-Chem Simulations for CMAQ Initial and Boundary Conditions 1 Yun-Fat Lam, 1 Joshua S. Fu, 2 Daniel J. Jacob, 3 Carey Jang and 3 Pat Dolwick.

Bay breeze enhanced air pollution event in Houston, Texas during the DISCOVER-AQ field campaign Christopher P. Loughner (University of Maryland) Melanie.

Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.

Sensitivity to changes in HONO emissions from mobile sources simulated for Houston area Beata Czader, Yunsoo Choi, Lijun Diao University of Houston Department.

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Revised CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation December.

1) Summary of climate change model and Green house gases; 2) Introduction to kinematics.

4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)

THE IMPACTS OF TRANS-BOUNDARY TRANSPORT OF AEROSOLS ON THE REGIONAL AIR QUALITY: A case study of Mexican wildland fire on May 1998 Hee-Jin In 1, Daewon.

Ozone Production Efficiency in the Baltimore/Washington Urban Plume Presentation by Linda Hembeck Co-Authors: Christopher Loughner, Timothy Vinziguerra,

Update on biogenic and soil emissions modeling for DYNAMO Daniel Cohan, Rui Zhang, Quazi Rasool, and Arastoo Pour Biazar AQAST 9 meeting, St. Louis University.

Modelling the impact of three sets of future vehicle emission standards on PM concentrations in the Lower Fraser Valley Weimin Jiang, Éric Giroux, Dazhong.

The Maryland State Implementation Plan By Russell Dickerson, Tim Canty, Dan Goldberg, Xinrong Ren, Tim Vinciguerra et al., The University of Maryland 1145.

CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.

Modeling the Co-Benefits of Carbon Standards for Existing Power Plants STI-6102 Stephen Reid, Ken Craig, Garnet Erdakos Sonoma Technology, Inc. Jonathan.

Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.

Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.

New York City Case Study: Methods of Analysis David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Syracuse, NY.

Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory | Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division| A Tale of Two Models: A Comparison.

Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.

Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,

Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.

1 DISCLAIMER Please note that this is a summary of a draft report of TERC Research Project H60. In order to fully respond to comments on the draft report.

Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Simulation of London air quality during June 2006 and the effects of emission control scenarios Andrea Fraser NCAS funded.

OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments--Round 3 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.

Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.

Climate Change and Ozone Air Quality: Applications of a Coupled GCM/MM5/CMAQ Modeling System C. Hogrefe 1, J. Biswas 1, K. Civerolo 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn.

Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.

OTC Modeling Committee April 2015 Update Presented by: Dan Goldberg Thursday April 9 th, 2015.

Effects of Emission Adjustments on Peak Ground-Level Ozone Concentration in Southeast Texas Jerry Lin, Thomas Ho, Hsing-wei Chu, Heng Yang, Santosh Chandru,

May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.

Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.

Air Quality Modeling of PM2.5 Species Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium & Midwest RPO 10/21/2002.

Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.

The Role of Background O 3 in the NAAQS Review George T. Wolff Air Improvement Resource, Inc.

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.

Updates to model algorithms and inputs for the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) model Jesse Bash, Kirk Baker, George Pouliot, Donna Schwede,

Reference Simulation Settings

Daniel Tong NOAA Air Resources Lab & George Mason University

Dynamic Evaluation of CMAQ-Modeled Ozone Response to Emission Changes in The South coast air Basin Prakash Karamchandani1, Ralph Morris1, Andrew Wentland1,

Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan

SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.

Recent Updates in v6.40 Chris Emery, Bonyoung Koo, Prakash Karamchandani, Gary Wilson, Greg Yarwood March 2, 2017.

Kenneth Craig, Garnet Erdakos, Lynn Baringer, and Stephen Reid

Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.

16th Annual CMAS Conference

Mingwei Li Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences

Modification of Tracegas Scenarios

C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder

2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.

Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.

The Double Dividend of Methane Control

Heather Simon, Kirk Baker, Norm Possiel, Pat Dolwick, Brian Timin

Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast

Increasing Canopy Cover in Urban Areas

SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH

CMAQ Developers’ Guidance

Overview of WRAP 2014 Platform develop and Shake-Out project update

Georgia Institute of Technology

Good afternoon, everyone. I am Momei, a postdoc from Georgia Tech.

PGM Boundary conditions

Science Panel Perspective

Presentation transcript:

Impacts on CMAQ Peak Ozone Predictions from using Different BEIS Biogenic Emissions Options April 22, 2019

This study is looking into The impact on CMAQ peak ozone predictions from using BELD water fix vs using the original BELD The impact on CMAQ peak ozone predictions from using inline BEIS biogenic emissions vs offline BEIS biogenic emissions

CMAQ version 5.2.1 2016 beta emissions (2016ff) for anthropogenic surface 2D emissions and 8 inline point sources emissions Four CMAQ simulations were conducted for the period of May to August 2016: Inline BEIS with original BELD Inline BEIS with BELD water fix Offline BEIS with original BELD Offline BEIS with BELD water fix

CMAQ4 Offline BEIS with BELD water fix CMAQ2 Inline BEIS with BELD water fix Two runs are with identical GSPRO (B10C6) and B3GRD files

Summary CMAQ using BEIS biogenic emissions with BELD water fix can have nontrivial (30+ ppb) DMA8 ozone reductions, especially over Long Island Sound and along northeast shoreline. CMAQ using offline BEIS biogenic emissions tends to have higher DMA8 ozone over water, compared to using inline BEIS biogenic emissions.