Accountability Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For Middle and K-8 Schools September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
Advertisements

Florida School Accountability Dr. Karen Schafer Accountability and Testing Adapted from Presentation June, 2014 by Ed Croft Bureau Chief, Accountability.
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
Test Chairpersons Meeting September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
Testing and Accountability Update: Legislation, School Grades July, 2013 Dr. Karen Schafer Director, Office of Accountability and Testing.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Rule Development Workshop: School Grades Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division of Accountability,
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
October Principal Meeting Proposed Framework for the School Grading System for and Beyond Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research.
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
A Survival Guide 13/23/2010.  Today’s Presentation  Presenters & Support Personnel  Handouts  Questions  Follow-Up School Visits 3/23/
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Testing and Accountability Update: Legislation, School Grades July, 2013 Dr. Karen Schafer Director, Office of Accountability and Testing.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update Florida Charter School Conference November 20, 2014.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Florida’s School Grading System Updates District Assessment and Accountability.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Technical Assistance Workshop March,
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Student Services Meeting September 2012 Gisela Feild 1.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C. Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum Contact Meeting Adapted.
1.  Non-FCAT Components  Review FCAT Components 2.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement School Grade Changes for All Schools in FCAT Writing Standard is set at 3.5. (in rule) Reading performance.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida’s School Grading System Overview and Updates 1.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. School Accountability Rules.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Fall Conference 2013 Lake Mary, Florida November 14, 2013.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Lake Mary, Florida May 8,
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
1 Status on the Proposed Changes to School Grades and the ESE and ELL Task Force A-1.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Accountability Update
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
FY12 Accountability Updates
School Accountability Rules
Accountability Update
Overview of School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress,
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
Gisela Feild Administrative Director
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
AYP and Report Card.
Revising High School Grading Requirements
Spencer County Public Schools
It’s A Whole New World Assessment and Accountability Updates
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
Presentation transcript:

2012-2013 Accountability Presentation Test Chairpersons Meeting September 2012

State Board Adoption of School Grades Changes for 2012 On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered extensive changes to the school grades rule. On that date, the Board also established a task force to make recommendations on implementing inclusion of students with disabilities, English Language Learners, and students with disabilities at ESE center schools. The Board met again on May 10, 2012, and adopted additional changes to the school grades rule based on the task force’s recommendations. The Board met once again in an emergency session on May 15, 2012, to address the FCAT Writing criterion. A 90-day emergency rule was adopted for the writing change (expires 90 days after it goes into effect). Leading up to the SBE meeting on February 28, 2012, the Department of Education met several times in the preceding year with advisory and stakeholder groups, including AAAC and LPAC, and garnered input on changes that were being considered. Key drivers of the changes included requirements in statute, scheduled changes in rule, and requirements for USED approval of Florida’s ESEA waiver application.

School Grade Models by School Type Text in red [underscored] indicates a new or changed requirement.

Elementary Schools Reading Math Writing Science Performance FCAT 2.0, FAA (100 points) FCAT, FAA Learning Gains All Students Low 25% Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 (300 points) Additional Requirements: For 2011-12 only, the adequate progress requirement for the Low 25% will not be applied. Test at Least 90% of students, 95% to earn an “A.” Beginning in 2012-13 – A performance threshold in Reading (25%) will be applied - Grade lowered one letter grade if not met .

High School EOC’s (Industry Certifications Middle Schools Reading Math Writing Science Civics Acceleration Performance 2011-12 High School EOC’s (Industry Certifications 2012-13) (100 points) FCAT 2.0, FAA FCAT 2.0, EOCs, FAA FCAT, FAA 2014-15 EOC Learning Gains All Students Low 25% Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 EOCs (300 points) Additional Requirements: For 2011-12 only, the adequate progress requirement for the Low 25% will not be applied. Test at Least 90% of students, 95% to earn an “A.” Beginning in 2012-13 – A performance threshold in Reading (25%) will be applied - Grade lowered one letter grade if not met .

High Schools Assessment Components – 50% “Other” Components – 50% Reading Math (Algebra, Geometry) Writing Biology (Science) Acceleration Grad Rate College Readiness US History Performance Participation (150 points) 2013-14 (100 points) Overall (200 points) 100 - Federal 100 - Modified 5-year EOC (100 points) FCAT 2.0, FAA EOC, FAA FCAT, FAA Learning Gains All Students At-Risk 50 – Federal 50 – Mod 5 Yr Math Low 25% Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 EOC (300 points) (0 points in 2011-12) (300points) (200 points beginning 2013-14) Additional Requirements: For 2011-12 only, the adequate progress requirement for the Low 25% will not be applied. Test at Least 90% of students, 95% to earn an “A.” Meet the at-risk graduation rate target - 65% or improvement targets. Beginning in 2012-13 - Performance threshold in Reading (25%) - Grade lowered one letter grade if not met.

Combination Schools (K-12, 6-12) Assessment Components – 80% for K-12’s, 70% for 6-12’s “Other” Components – 20% for K-12’s, 30% for 6-12’s Reading Math (Algebra, Geometry) Writing Science Civics HS Acceleration Grad Rate College Readiness Middle School Acceleration US History Performance Participation (150 points) 2013-14 (100 points) Overall (200 points) Participation (50 points) Performance (50 points) 2013-14 EOC FCAT 2.0, FAA FCAT 2.0, EOC, FAA FCAT, FAA FCAT, EOCs, FAA (100 pts.) (2014-15) EOC Learning Gains All Students At Risk Math FCAT 2.0, EOC, FAA Low 25% Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 FCAT 2.0, EOC (300 points) (300points) (200 points beginning 2013-14) Additional Requirements: For 2011-12 only, the adequate progress requirement for the Low 25% will not be applied. Test at Least 90% of students, 95% to earn an “A.” Meet the at-risk graduation rate target of 65% or improvement targets. Beginning in 2012-13 - Performance threshold in Reading (25%) - Grade lowered one letter grade if not met.

Changes for School Grading 2012-2013

School Grades Changes for 2013 FCAT Writing Standard State Board review in October 2012 Scores credited back from students at alternative schools Reading performance threshold (25%) begins. One-letter-grade drop limit expires (unless renewed by the State Board). Adequate progress requirement for the Low 25% in reading and math resumes.

School Grades Changes for 2013 New assessments (EOCs) and achievement levels – Biology, Geometry Additional EOCs and Industry Certifications are included in middle school acceleration. Geometry and Biology EOCs are included in math and science performance measures. Biology provides points for science for high schools. Geometry is included in learning gains calculations for math. Algebra 1 is included in determining Low 25% group for math. Increased grade scale values for high schools in 2013 (points for an A, for a B, etc.)? Contingent on HS grades for 2012 – whether 75% make A’s or B’s.

School Grades Changes for 2013 Issues still unresolved: Five-year graduation rate – special diplomas in numerator – ongoing discussion with USED Adequate progress calculation for the Low 25%: If rule is not changed, calculation would be based on percent making learning gains rather than learning gains points. Lowest 25% composition (math): Algebra 1 scores included in ranking of prior-year scores One ranking for FCAT 2.0 scores (by grade level); another ranking for Algebra 1 scores (all); then the Lowest 25% from each are combined Algebra 1 to Algebra 1 learning gains (comparison of achievement levels)

School Grades Changes for 2013 Issues: A Closer Look at Select Areas (continued) Industry Certifications in middle school acceleration: Reported IC outcome(s) would add a student to the participation denominator if not already included. Would count for full weight in the numerator if the student isn’t already represented in the numerator. Counts as extra 0.1 in numerator if the student is already represented in the numerator.

School Grades Changes for 2013 Issues: A Closer Look at Select Areas (continued) Cell size for high school math performance and learning gains/Low 25 gains: At least 20 test scores, based on any combination of Algebra 1, Geometry, and FAA scores, including banked EOC scores for performance (but not for gains). Learning Gains for Geometry: Algebra 1 in prior year compared to Geometry in current year. Same criteria for gains as currently applied for FCAT 2.0 Math to Algebra.

High School Grades Non-FCAT Components 14

Summary, High School Grades (Non-State-Assessment Components) GRADUATION ACCELERATION College READINESS GROWTH/DECLINE Overall Rate 200 100 for 4-Year Federal 100 for 5-Year Modified Participation 150 Reading 100 For each component schools may earn up to 10 additional points for GROWTH (20 points for a factor worth 200 points) At-Risk Rate 50 for 4-Year Federal 50 for 5-Year Modified Performance Mathematics For each component schools may lose 5 additional points for DECLINE (10 points for a factor worth 200 points) Total Graduation Points 300 Total Acceleration Points Total Readiness Points Total Non-Assessment Points Possible 800 All component values are capped at their maximum values. That is, if a school earns points in excess of the total for a particular component – through the growth adjustment or the escalating weights in the acceleration components – the school will receive the maximum points for that component. 15

Components Outside State Assessments (50% of High School Grade) Graduation rate. [200 points] Federal 4-year rate (100). Modified 5-year rate (100) Graduation rate of at-risk students. [100 points] Federal 4-year rate (50). Modified 5-year rate (50) Accelerated curriculum participation (AP, IB, Dual Enrollment, AICE, Industry Certification) [150 points] Accelerated curriculum performance [150 points] 16

Components Outside State Assessments (50% of High School Grade) Postsecondary readiness of students as measured by the SAT, ACT, or the CPT. [100 points, Math; 100 points, Reading] Growth or decline in the data components of these measures from year to year. Additionally, to receive an “A”, a school must demonstrate that at-risk students in the school are making adequate progress. 17

Graduation Rate [200 points] The graduation rate measure will consist of two rates: Four-year federal uniform rate (100 points) Required under ESEA (34 CFR §200.19). Only standard diploma recipients count as graduates. Modified five-year rate (100 points) Counts special diploma recipients as graduates. Calculated as follow-up to prior-year federal 4-year rate. Uses same denominator as prior-year 4-year rate but adds 5th year graduates to the numerator. For new schools that do not have enough students for a five-year cohort rate, we will substitute a modified four-year rate (counting special diploma recipients as graduates). 18

Postsecondary Readiness Components Cut Scores CPT   Math 72 Reading 83 SAT Verbal 440 ACT 18 19 P.E.R.T. 104 113 19

Additional Requirement for “A” High Schools In order for a high school that earns enough points for an “A” to be awarded an “A”, the school’s at-risk graduation rate must meet a certain threshold to ensure “adequate progress.” Threshold: 65% (based on 4-year federal rate component); or 1 percentage point improvement over the prior year if percentage is within 10 points of the target 5 percentage point improvement over the prior year if percentage is more than 10 points lower than the target 20

High School Grade Scale Grading Scale for High Schools = 1,600-point scale: A = At least 1,050 points, B = 990 to 1,049 points, C = 870 to 989 points, D = 790 to 869 points, F = Fewer than 790 points. Combination schools that serve high school grades (graded on a 1,700 point scale) receive a grade that re-weights the FCAT measures and the new high school measures: Grade K-12 schools are weighted 80% on the state- assessment based measures, and 20% on the other measures (vs. 50/50 for regular high schools). Grade 6-12 schools are weighted 70% on the state- assessment based measures, and 30% on the other measures. The new middle school component is grouped with the “other” measures when weighting is applied. 6-12 Schools:  Weighting Factor for State-Assessment-Based Points = 1.4875 1,700 points x .70 = 1,190 rescaled points basis for state-assessment based measures 1,190 ÷ 800 (unweighted max points for state-assessment measures) = 1.4875   Weighting Factor for Points Based on Other Measures = 0.5667 1,700 points x .30 = 510 rescaled points basis for other measures 510 ÷ 900 (unweighted max points for other measures) = 0.5667 Weighting factors for K-12 schools (80/20 weighting) are 1.7 for state-assessment based points and 0.3778 for the points based on other measures. 21

Data Reporting for High School Grading, Key Points: Deadline for submission of amended/new Survey 5 records for use in the 2012 HS grades is October 12, 2012. Non-appealable. Deadline for submission of corrected files for the cohort graduation rate for use in the 2011 HS grades is October 12, 2012. (Sept. 28, 2012, for five-year rate files) Non-appealable. A separate corrections/review period will be set in October/November 2012 for AP, IB, ACT, SAT, CPT/PERT data to focus on maximizing records matching. 22 Accountability Research and Measurement