CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 ENVISAT Calibration Review, ESTEC 9-13 Sept 2002, DORIS & ORBIT, Berthyl Duesmann.
Advertisements

Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
POD/Geoid splinter March 14, 2007 J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March 2007.
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
POD/Geoid Splinter Summary OSTS Meeting, Hobart 2007.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
Impact of SLR tracking on GPS Position Paper presented at the ILRS Workshop on SLR tracking of GNSS constellations September 14-19, 2009 Metsovo, Greece.
DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.
International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October
ESOC Navigation Support Office ILRS Workshop 2008 Poznan, Poland ESOC IGS, IDS, ILRS (Re-) processing T. Springer, M. Otten, I. Romero, J. Dow.
Assessment of SLR observation performance using LAGEOS data Gang ZHAO, You ZHAO, Mingguo Sun, Huanhuan YU Changchun Observatory, NAOC, CAS, China 16 th.
ILRS Workshop, Poznan, Poland, October Status of ITRF Development and SLR Contribution Zuheir Altamimi Xavier Collilieux David Coulot IGN France.
Homework 3 will include a Helmert Transformation Estimation problem. Specifically interested in scale. Started on January 29, 2010.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
Jim Ray & Jake Griffiths NOAA/National Geodetic Survey STATUS OF IGS ORBIT MODELING & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Earth radiation pressure (albedo) accelerations.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 37: SNC Example and Solution Characterization.
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC New Developments and Innovations T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, M. Otten, I. Romero,
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC IGS Reprocessing T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, I. Romero, J. Tegedor, F. Pereira,
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
IGS Workshop 2008, June 2-6, Miami Beach First activities of the IGS Antenna Working Group — Comparison of ground- and space-based satellite antenna maps.
International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 2008, Poznań (Poland) Quality assessment of the ILRS EOP „Daily” Product G. Bianco Agenzia Spaziale.
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
Site Surveys at HartRAO NERC Space Geodesy Facility, Herstmonceux ILRS Fall 2005 Workshop 3 October 2005 Ludwig Combrinck HartRAO Space Geodesy Programme.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008 Combination of the Analysis Centers Reprocessed “SINEX” Solutions Rémi Ferland Geodetic Survey Division.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Terrestrial Reference Frame Effects on Global Sea Level Rise determination from TOPEX/Poseidon altimetric data Laurent Morel a, Pascal Willis b,c a Ecole.
NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Jason-1 POD reprocessing at CNES Current status and further developments L. Cerri, S. Houry, P. Perrachon, F. Mercier. J.P. Berthias with entries from.
Investigations on (radial) offsets between different Swarm orbit solutions 8 September th Swarm Data Quality Workshop, IPGP, Paris Heike Peter (PosiTim),
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Aurore Sibois and Shailen Desai
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
ACC/GPSR Splinter Summary
Force models for GPS Orbit modeling
CNES/CLS AC (GRG), IDS CC
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
ACC and GPS summary Christian Siemes, QWG and Cal/Val team Copenhagen, Denmark 18/06/2014.
Impact of the Antenna Model Change on IGS Products
EGU2007-A-10154, NP6.04 Tuesday 17 of April, Vienna 2007
Unified Analysis Workshop, July 2017, Paris
Real-Time Working Group
Analysis Center + Reference Frame Working Group
Presentation of Public ESA Multi-GNSS Products
Validation Activities for Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon Precise Orbits
Characterization and Impact of DORIS scale variations
ESOC IGS Reprocessing T. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann,
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
WHY DOES THE IGS CARE ABOUT EOPs?
Numerical evidence for the inconsistent separation
Reference Frame Working Group Report
Motivation Time Series Analysis Spectra and Results Conclusions
Combination of reprocessed orbit, clock and ERP products
Presentation transcript:

CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits and SLR Residuals Sylvain Loyer (CLS) Félix Perosanz (CNES) Hugues Capdeville (CLS) IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Miami, USA

CNES-CLS IGS Analysis Center: igsac-cnes.cls.fr GRGS IERS/CRC GINS software GPS IGN CNES CLS IGS BDL OMP DORIS IDS OCA UPF SLR ILS INSU SHOM VLBI OB IVS ESGT OP Submission & evaluation started July 2007 joined officially IGS ACs week 1478 IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

Motivation of this study Several months of evaluation of CNES-CLS products indicate that the main discrepancies are on orbit products : around 3.5 – 4 cm WRMS3D vs IGS final orbits a systematic scale of around 1 ppb (~2.64 cm at GPS altitude) exhibits between CNES-CLS and IGS orbits Pole and station coordinate solutions are very comparable to any other AC. We wanted to investigate the source of the scale vs IGS : dynamic parameters modeling (i.e. SRP parameterization) dynamic modeling (i.e. ALBEDO force model) using SLR observations. IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA SLR tracking of SV35 and 36 SLR residual analysis is supposed to give an independent evaluation of the precision and accuracy of the computed orbit (up to a level of ~ 5 mm) In the framework of GRGS team activities SLR data are routinely processed using the GINS software (ILS, EIGEN gravity field modeling,…) Questions : Origin of a systematic bias between SLR data and IGS and ACs orbits solutions ? What is the impact on GPS orbits of considering or not ALBEDO forces in the orbit computation ? Is the orbital precision derived from the statistical distribution of SLR residuals consistent with the expected value ? IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

Dynamical model and processing strategy Full description available at : http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/center/analysis/grg.acn (see also Jim Ray’s presentation in this session) Main significant differences: 48h Arc length ; 15mn data rate ; real ambiguities Radiation pressure : Solar direct + Earth albedo and IR flux GINS Box and wing model (19 planar surfaces) Nominal satellite attitude (no yaw steering model) Empirical parameters (6+6 per arc) : 1 scale/arc in factor of solar pressure 1 {Y}-bias/arc 1/rev. sin & cos in {X’} {D} Albedo and IR : Systematic ~ 5. 10-10 m/s/s mainly in {Z} Flux from ECMWF 6h grids Include overcast and umbra effects IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

SLR data set and SLR processing strategy Data from 10 October 2007 to 10 may 2008 ; (2099/1983) valid normals points for GPS(35/36). Data weigthing : station quality factor + from LAGEOS residuals analysis + uncertainties from ITRF2005 coord. Fixed IGS or GRG orbits + one SLR bias per station IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA SLR CoM offset CoM offsets : XY values : 862.6 mm / -524.5 mm (values in millimeters) GPS35 GPS36 ILRS Z axis (radial)(recomanded) (see also A. Davis & J. Trask, 08/2007). 669.5 671.7 Used Z axis (« old » values) used in this study. 658.4 Differences 11.1 13.3 IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA Statistics on SLR residuals (cm) GRG IGS GPS35 2.88 (1983) 2.44 (1983) GPS36 2.45 (2099) 1.98 (2099) Global 1.72 (1516) 1.46 (1516) 1.97 (1656) 1.77 (1656) Non-eclips periods 4.65 (467) 3.57 (467) 3.65 (459) 2.27 (459) Eclips periods IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Miami, USA SLR adjusted biases SLR bias differences : IGS=GRG -2.4 cm (0.91 ppb) GRG bias nearest from 0 cm (i.e. compatible with Laser Station calibration) IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Miami, USA

Dynamic impact of Albedo force. 1.6 cm (0.6 ppb) in syst. radial with nearly no change for other statistics. IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Miami, USA All values together… CoM offsets } Albedo JPL ESA and GRG use an Albedo model in their orbit processing. (Scales computed by G. Gendt & T. Nishan) IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Miami, USA

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA CONCLUSIONS SLR bias still not compatible with IGS scale Discrepancies between ACs remain large (1 ppb) CNES-CLS orbit closer to « old » CoM offset value Albedo forces explain 0.6 ppb of the scale and maybe part of scale discrepancies between ACs. CNES-CLS scale is less than 0.5 ppb relatively to Laser data ACs with Albedo modeling (except EMR) are closer to current laser CoM offset value Radial error of CNES-CLS orbits increase SLR RMS by 2.5 mm IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 May 2008, Miami, USA

=> Main discrepancy concern orbits scale and WRMS. Orbits vs IGS Combined orbit: TX = 2 +/- 1.5 mm ; TY = 0.3 +/- 1 mm ; TZ = -2 +/- 3 mm RX = -17 +/- 35 uas ; RY = -75 +/- 65 uas ; RZ = 38 +/- 60 uas Scale = 1 + /- 0.05 ppb ; WRMS3D : 3.2 +/- 0.35 cm Stations vs IGS05 (bias + rms) Nord = 0 +/- 2.5 mm ; Est = 0 +/- 1 mm ; Up = 0 +/- 6 mm Pôle vs IGS solution (bias + rms) Xp = 5 +/- 25 uas ; Yp = 43 +/- 30 uas ; LOD = -1.5 +/- 32 usec Xprate = -56 +/- 90 uas/day ; Yprate = -6.5 +/- 90 uas /day => Main discrepancy concern orbits scale and WRMS. IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Miami, USA