Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Design options

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
D2 conceptual design and field quality optimization Ramesh Gupta, BNL Slide No. 1 Nov. 13, 2013 D2 Conceptual Design and Field Quality.
Advertisements

A.KOVALENKO SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS for NICA BOOSTER & COLLIDER NICA ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION - 3 JINR, Dubna, November 05, 2008.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
1 Task particle simulations studies: preliminary results of D2 field quality M. Giovannozzi Setting up of simulations Results Outlook NB: numerical.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Update J. Rysti and E. Todesco 1 4/11/2014.
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
D2 CONFIGURATIONS P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova  Starting from previous studies done at CERN, BNL and BLNL, possile cross sections of D2 dipole.
FCC week March 2015 Marriott Georgetown Hotel D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore INFN Genova D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
SBS Magnet and Support Status Robin Wines June 2013.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
Cosine-theta configurations for S.C. Dipole Massimo Sorbi on behalf of: INFN LASA & Genova Team Giovanni Bellomo, Pasquale Fabbricarore, Stefania Farinon,
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
E. Todesco HL LHC LAYOUT FROM Interaction POINT TO SEPARATION DIPOLE E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R.
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013D2 Status and Plans – G. Sabbi 1 D2 Conceptual Design Status and Next Steps G. Sabbi, X. Wang High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Update on the CCT Option
Preliminary Magnetic Analysis of the CCT Magnet for HL-LHC
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
D2 and Q4 orbit corrector status
16T Cosθ Dipole Configuration
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project
DESIGN OPTIONS FOR ORBIT CORRECTORS IN D2 and Q4
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project (v2) F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT, March 7th, 2013.
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
IR Beam Transport Status
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Design options J. Rysti and E. Todesco 17/09/2014 xxx

Requirements Integrated field 4.5 Tm. Multipoles below 10 units at all operational fields and configurations. First-guess layout (baseline): 3 T field, two units 1.5 m long, one H and one V. 105 mm diameter apertures Cross-talk problem Not enough iron between apertures 17/09/2014 xxx

How to fix the problem? Here we have tried to see how to optimize the field quality with the given constraints in a twin aperture configuration. This is not a detailed design proposal. Reduce aperture diam. 105 mm -> 100 mm. H/V configuration For H/H: B3 > 120 units at 2.7 T and for H/V: ~10 units). 17/09/2014 xxx

Various designs studied 17/09/2014 xxx

Best found design 17/09/2014 xxx

H/H vs. H/V 17/09/2014 xxx

Best found design 17/09/2014 xxx

Multipoles in aperture 1 (left) All other multipoles are below 1 at all fields 17/09/2014 xxx

Multipoles in aperture 2 (right) All other multipoles are below 1 at all fields 17/09/2014 xxx

The other magnet turned off 17/09/2014 xxx

Low field, changing other magnet 17/09/2014 xxx

How to implement this design Collars from soft iron or thin steel collars? Iron strong enough, but pre-stress lost in cooling. Thin steel collar (6 mm) not strong enough and difficult to make. No collars, compress entire yoke? Challenging & cannot test magnets individually. Increase collar thickness: At 6 mm: max field 2.73 T At 10 mm: max field 2.65 T At 15 mm: max field 2.56 T 17/09/2014 xxx

15 mm collars 6 mm ”collars” 17/09/2014 xxx

6 mm vs. 15 mm collar/spacer 17/09/2014 xxx

Laminated iron/steel collars? Make the ”floating collars” from iron. Using stacking factor 0.5 in ROXIE iron file. Preliminary results not very good (B3 > 100). Fessia & Perini, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 12, 202 (2002). 17/09/2014 xxx

Other options Nested H & V dipoles in a single aperture. Staggered magnets (double required length). Exotic possibilities: NbTi sheets between apertures to shield fields? 17/09/2014 xxx

Conclusions Requirements fulfilled up to 2.7 T. 15 cm per magnet more length copared to baseline (1.5 m). Mechanically difficult. With realistic collars (15 mm) max field down to around 2.5-2.6 T. 25-30 cm per magnet more length compared to baseline (1.5 m). 17/09/2014 xxx

Remarks If aperture 1 goes from 3 T to 0 T, aperture 2 changes 0.02 T (0.8 %). If aperture 2 goes from 3 T to 0 T, aperture 1 changes 0.03 T (1 %). In aperture 1, ~15 units of A2 at 3 T. In aperture 2, >20 units of A3 & B3 at 3 T. Some constant multipoles around or above 10 units (B7/A7 ~11 units, B5/A5 ~8 units). These may be possible to correct with further optimization of the configuration. 17/09/2014 xxx

Extra slides