Sustainability and scalability Croatian Institute of Public Health

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
Advertisements

Implementing NICE guidance
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Health Promotion Model
From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.
Key Findings : Paying for Self-Management Supports as Part of Integrated Community Health Care Systems July, 2012.
INCREASING HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE IN THE INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT SETTING.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Patient Information Recall Systems. Learning objectives Understand the link between population health data and chronic disease care Know what information.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
The Annual Quality Report A dynamic tool for quality management and accountability.
Presentation to the Virtual Ward June 7 th, 2011 Physician eHealth Program David Banh eHealth Ontario.
Module 3. Session Clinical Audit Prepared by J Moorman.
EVALUATION OF THE TEACHING PROCESS Marta Ljubešić National Council for Higher Education Zagreb - Croatia.
INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR IMMUNIZATION SERVICES IPV Global Workshop March 2014.
Chronic Disease Strategy Rural and Remote. Learning objectives Be familiar with the Chronic Disease Strategy in rural and remote settings Understand the.
The future use of Electronic Health Records for reshaped health statistics: opportunities and challenges in the Australian context Denise Carlton Director.
EMR Optimization in a Medical Clinic Environment: An Analysis of IT Support By Lydia Maples Senior Thesis Fall 2014.
RACMA Quality demystified RACMA candidates RACMA candidates.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
NHS Cambridgeshire (formerly Cambridgeshire PCT) Visit our web site: EVALUATION OF NHS HEALTH CHECKS.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Improving health worldwide Implications for Monitoring of the HIV Care Cascade? Jim Todd MeSH Satellite Session IAS Durban, Monday 18 th.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Working effectively as a team.
Research Fairness Initiative (RFI)
Cost Effective Mobile Base Health Monitoring System Under Cloud Environment. To interpret health from their mobiles under cloud environment and creating.
One Approach to Bundled Payments
Transgender/Trans* Health
SNOMED CT Education SIG: Strategic Plan Review
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Data Quality Assurance
The e-Health landscape in 2019 in Belgium: Strategy and actions
Improving performance measurement in Primary Health Care
Implementing the guideline
COMPGZ09 Project Management Definitions Lecture 1 Graham Collins, UCL
Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
MODULE 24 – EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND GENDER BALANCE
Jack Millaway and Melody Robinson LPHI
eHealth in the Region of the Americas:
CMMI – Staged Representation
TCPI Project Pathway: Session 3 of 8 Staff Engagement: Teamwork and Joy # 6 and 19 (24) To QIA for possible use: Thank you for taking my call and listening.
Roadmap to an Organizational Culture of QI
Engaging and Empowering People and Communities
Edit Nemeth, Vice Chair of IACOP
Edit Nemeth, Vice Chair of IACOP
Improving Outcomes by Helping People Take Control
Global Gender Statistics Programme
Accountable care organizations
SRH & HIV Linkages Agenda
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
Reporting in CRC screening
Understanding Equity Gaps for Roma Children in Croatia
High level seminar on the implementation of the
Capacity building on the use of Geospatial Data and Technologies
Introduction to geospatial data management and technologies for PHDs
Component 11 Unit 7: Building Order Sets
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Module 3: Part 1 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Understanding the QI Plan Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
CHRODIS PLUS Croatian pilot – Baseline analysis of indicators
CHRODIS + Croatian pilot from the MoH perspective
Key performance indicators
CROATIAN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
Tamara Poljičanin, MD, PhD Croatian Institute of Public Health
Celebrating Success and Making a Plan for Sustainability
Module 1.1 Overview of Master Facility Lists in Nigeria
Performance management in public institutions
Impact of quality on day-to-day efforts of PHC
Presentation transcript:

Sustainability and scalability Croatian Institute of Public Health CHRODIS PLUS Sustainability and scalability The title and the main topic of this presentation is sustainability and scalability of the pilot. Marija Švajda Croatian Institute of Public Health Zagreb, 26th-27th March 2019

Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats GOVERNANCE PRACTICE DESIGN TARGET POPULATION EMPOWERMENT EDUCATION AND TRAINING SUSTAINABILITY AND SCALABILITY Strengths Weaknesses You wouldn’t say so when you see this schema, would you? To get to sustainability and scalability we have to go through all quality criteria first, and detect strengths, opportunities, weaknesses and threats for each of them. Because only through knowing our strong sides, and our weaknesses and threats, we can build sustainable project. Opportunities Threats

Governance MDS aligned with international standards and mutually between systems Clearly defined institutional responsibilities and mandates regarding eHealth and health information systems in Croatia 3 years of available routine data collected from EHRs in GPs S W O T Unclear institutional mandates in health information standards in Croatia Our goal, when it comes to governance dimension, is to align our minimum data set with international standards, and to clearly define institutional responsibilities regarding eHealth and health information systems in Croatia. The good thing is we have, for past 3 years, available routine data collected from electronic health records in GPs, and we have decision supporting tools in GPs. However, institutional mandates in health information standards are still unclear, and implementation of new technical solutions in GPs goes relatively slow. To be successful we have to make institutional mandates more clear, and speed up the implementation of technical solutions. Decision supporting tools in GPs Relatively slow implementation of new technical solutions in GPs

Practice design Info to general practitioners on the current and expected use of diabetes control check-list as a minimum dataset within diabetes registry “Diabetes panel” module is a useful decision-making tool which meets the administrative needs of Croatian Health Insurance Fund All GPs are using “diabetes panel” module within their EHRs S W O T “Diabetes panel” module doesn’t provide an insight into the health history of the patient GPs have no control over their work in the “diabetes panel” module MDS of diabetes panel is not aligned with CroDiab From practice design point of view, we should inform GPs on the current and expected use of diabetes control check-lists. On the positive side, diabetes panel module is useful tool which meets the administrative needs of NHI fund, and all GPs are using it. The opportunity for change lays in its modifiable data structure. But we are aware of its weaknesses as well. It doesn’t provide an insight into the health history of the patient, GPs don’t have a control over their work in the panel, and MDS of diabetes panel is not aligned with our diabetic patients registry. Threats are relatively low awareness of the importance of standardised clinical practice and health information system, and some parameters in diabetes panel are not equally available for all GPs. Easily modifiable data structure of diabetes panel module within EHR in GPs Relatively low awareness of the importance of standardised clinical practice and health information systems Some parameters in the “diabetes panel” module are not equally available for all GPs

Target population empowerment Info on available services at primary health care level (GPs) and the expected benefits and empowerment for their regular use GPs are motivated to participate in development of tool to help them in efficient monitoring of diabetic patients S W O T Some GPs are not informed on what the panels are and how to use them GPs are generally overworked The practice should actively promote the empowerment of the target population. We would do that by informing GPs on available services and expected benefits, and encouragement for their regular use. GPs are motivated to participate in development of a tool which would help them in efficient monitoring of diabetes patients, and that strength should be used for our goals. The opportunity lays in strong evidence of efficiency of interventions with help of diabetes registers. However, the weakness is that some GPs are not informed on what the panels are and how to use them, and they are generally overworked. The threat is potentially low motivation for basic clinical practice topics. Strong evidence of efficiency of interventions with help of diabetes registries Potentially low motivation due to topics that are covering basic clinical practice (such as “proper washing hands”)

Education and training Education and feedback to data sources on their performance and QI There is system of continuous health professionals education in place that can be used for the pilot purpose General practitioners are educated through various educational platforms which regularly cover diabetes topics Diabetes patients are generally highly motivated to attend regular check-ups S W O T Diabetes is only until recently in the domain of GPs Guidelines for the GPs are constantly changing Diabetes patients are generally poorly aware of their rights and responsibilities as a diabetes patient The importance of diabetes registry in quality of care not perceived by patients In an attempt to reshape the practice (increase panel usage) we will give feedback to our GPs on their performance and quality indicators. There is a system of continuous health professionals education in place that can be used for the pilot purpose, GPs are educated through various educational platforms which regularly cover diabetes topics and diabetes patients are generally highly motivated to attend regular check-ups. These are strong sides which are going to contribute to our education and training efforts. Opportunity lays in potentially high interest in insight of personal health history, status, goals and achievements of diabetic patients. On the other hand, we have a few obstacles here: diabetes is only until recently in the domain of GPs, guidelines for the GPs are constantly changing, diabetes patients are generally poorly aware of their rights and responsibilities, and the importance of diabetes registry in quality of care is not perceived by patients. Relatively low interest of patients in „internal” organisational issues within health care system might be a threat here. Potentially high interest in insight of personal health history, status, goals and achievements of diabetic patients Relatively low interest of patients in „internal” organisational issues within health care system

Sustainability and scalability Ensured sustainable check lists usage and diabetes registry holding CIPH has an important role in strategic planning and implementation of pilot good practices S W O T Unclear institutional responsibilities and mandates regarding eHealth and health information systems The continuation of the practice is the key and we are supposed to ensure sustainable check lists usage and diabetes registry holding. The strengths lay in the fact that CIPH has an important role in strategic planning and implementation of pilot, has long experience with other, similar registries, and has a sustainable source of funding. However, unclear institutional responsibilities and mandates regarding eHealth and health information systems might be an obstacle in maintaining sustainability. We also have to take care of data quality over time, because it may have a tendency to decrease. CIPH holds diabetes registry and has a sustainable source of funding Decrease in data quality over time (coverage, timeliness, accuracy etc.) due to lack of feedback from reporting authorities

Number of patients in CroDiab and yearly number of applications Number of patients in CroDiab registry (from 2013 CEZIH, from 2015 Panels) The pilot has very high sustainability potential, because panels are already contributing to CroDiab registry very much – since their introduction yearly number of applications to CroDiab registry has tripled. However, panels are not aligned with indicators which need to be tracked in order to improve the quality of care. Some important elements are missing from panels, like hypoglycaemia or feet examination. One of the goals of the pilot is aligning panels with MDS. 39925 39772 42282 41362 37825 35643 32572 28964 23650 26238 23082 15495 4474 Yearly number of applications to CroDiab registry Yearly number of applications from Panels

THANK YOU!