Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Advertisements

Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
CD4+CD25+ Immunoregulatory T Cells
Retinoic acid inhibits Th17 polarization and enhances FoxP3 expression through a Stat-3/Stat-5 independent signaling pathway by Kevin M. Elias, Arian Laurence,
Differentiation of CD4+ T Cells to Th1 Cells Requires MAP Kinase JNK2
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Feedback Regulation of Pathogen-Specific T Cell Priming
Inhibition of Th1 Differentiation by IL-6 Is Mediated by SOCS1
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
by Éric Aubin, Réal Lemieux, and Renée Bazin
Preactivation with IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 Induces CD25 and a Functional High-Affinity IL-2 Receptor on Human Cytokine-Induced Memory-like Natural Killer.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Live Cell Fluorescence Imaging of T Cell MEKK2
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Biochemical Mechanisms of IL-2–Regulated Fas-Mediated T Cell Apoptosis
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Ananda W Goldrath, Michael J Bevan  Immunity 
Giandomenica Iezzi, Klaus Karjalainen, Antonio Lanzavecchia  Immunity 
NKT Cells Inhibit the Onset of Diabetes by Impairing the Development of Pathogenic T Cells Specific for Pancreatic β Cells  Lucie Beaudoin, Véronique.
Jürgen Ruland, Gordon S Duncan, Andrew Wakeham, Tak W Mak  Immunity 
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
James I Kim, I-Cheng Ho, Michael J Grusby, Laurie H Glimcher  Immunity 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
A Two-Step Process for Thymic Regulatory T Cell Development
Elevation of Intracellular Cyclic AMP in Alloreactive CD4+ T Cells Induces Alloantigen- Specific Tolerance That Can Prevent GVHD Lethality In Vivo  Matthew.
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Semaphorin 7A Is a Negative Regulator of T Cell Responses
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
C5a Negatively Regulates Toll-like Receptor 4-Induced Immune Responses
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
T Cell–Mediated Elimination of B7.2 Transgenic B Cells
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
B7h, a Novel Costimulatory Homolog of B7. 1 and B7
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
SOCS1 Prevents Potentially Skin-Reactive Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes from Gaining the Ability to Cause Inflammatory Lesions  Galaxia Maria Rodriguez, Dante.
The CD28 Signaling Pathway Regulates Glucose Metabolism
Luk Van Parijs, Alexander Ibraghimov, Abul K. Abbas  Immunity 
Semaphorin 7A Is a Negative Regulator of T Cell Responses
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Memory CD8+ T Cells Undergo Peripheral Tolerance
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation Todd N Eagar, Qizhi Tang, Michael Wolfe, Yiping He, Warren S Pear, Jeffrey A Bluestone  Immunity  Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 407-415 (April 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0

Figure 1 Notch Engagement Inhibits T Cell Proliferation (A) T cell proliferation in the presence of Jagged 1. Latex beads were coated with anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and anti-Myc. The beads were incubated in culture supernatants from control or soluble myc-tagged Jagged 1 producing cultures. The beads were washed and added in equal numbers to freshly isolated CD4+ T cells. T cell proliferation was determined. (B) Antigen-specific proliferation in the presence of Delta-1. A20 cells were transfected with control vector or murine Delta-1. The transfectants were FACS purified, treated with mitomycin C, and used as APCs for DO11.10 TCR transgenic T cells. The APCs and T cells were incubated in the absence or presence of OVA 323–339 peptide at 0.1 μg/ml, and T cell-proliferative responses were determined. (C) T cell proliferation and treatment with anti-Notch 1. Bulk splenocytes were isolated, and T cell proliferation was stimulated with anti-CD3. Control Ig or anti-Notch 1 was added at the indicated concentrations. (D) Purified T cell proliferation in the presence of crosslinked Notch 1. Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated by flow cytometry and stimulated with beads that had been previously coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 with either control Ig or anti-Notch 1 in a 72 hr proliferation assay. (E and F) Cytokine production in the presence of Notch 1 engagement. Naive T cells were isolated and stimulated with bead-bound anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and either control Ig or anti-Notch 1. Culture supernatants were taken at 48 hr of stimulation, and interferon γ and IL-2 concentrations were determined by ELISA. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)

Figure 2 Notch Signaling Inhibits T Cell Activation The effects of Notch engagement on the expression of surface activation markers were determined by flow cytometry. Naive CD4+, CD25−, CD62Lhi T cells were sorted from the lymph nodes and spleens of donor mice. The T cells were incubated for 24 hr in the presence of plate-bound anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and either control Ig (top panels) or anti-Notch 1 (bottom panels). Following stimulation the cells were stained for flow cytometry with antibodies to CD4, CD25, CD69, and IL-2. The analysis shown is based on forward and side scatter gates. The numbers indicate the percentage of cells in each quadrant. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)

Figure 3 Effects of Notch 1 Engagement Require Antibody Immobilization Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated and labeled with CFSE. T cells were incubated in the presence of plate-bound and soluble antibodies. (A) Wells were coated with control Ig, and control Ig was added to the media. (B–D) The culture wells were precoated with anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and either control Ig (B and D) or anti-Notch 1 (C). To the media in each well was added control Ig (B and C) or anti-Notch 1 (D). CFSE dilution was determined by flow cytometry at 72 hr using forward and side scatter gates. The numbers shown indicate the percentage of cells that have divided (in box) relative to total gated events. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)

Figure 4 Effects of Notch 1 Engagement Require Presenilin and Induce HES 1 Expression (A) Effects of Notch 1 engagement are dependent on presenilin activity. CD4+ T cells were isolated and stimulated with beads previously coated with anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and either control Ig or anti-Notch 1. In replicate wells, vehicle alone or compound E (10 nM) was added. (B) Blocking presenilin enhances T cell proliferation. Purified CD4+ T cells were stimulated in round-bottomed culture plates that had been previously coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Vehicle or compound E (10 nM) was added to each well. (C) Diverse effects of presenilin inhibitors in T cell stimulation. Purified T cells were stimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (upper panel) or APCs and soluble anti-CD3 (lower panel) in the presence of vehicle or compound E (10 nM). (D) Engagement of Notch 1 induces expression of HES-1. Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated by flow cytometry. 108 cells per group were stimulated for 48 hr in the presence of beads coated with anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and either control Ig or anti-Notch 1. At the end of culture, the cells were lysed, and immunoprecipitation and Western blotting were performed for HES-1. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)

Figure 5 Biochemical Analysis of T Cell Activation Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated and stimulated for 5, 10, or 30 min with beads coated with anti-CD3 and B7-1Ig and either control Ig or anti-Notch 1 (A) or antibodies to CD3, CD28, and either control or anti-Notch 1 (B). Cell lysates were made and Western blotting performed using antibodies directed to phosphorylated epitopes on (A) ERK 1, 2 (T202, Y204), and (B) GSK-3α/β (S21/9), AKT (S473). To demonstrate equal loading for GSK and AKT, parallel Western blots were performed for total AKT. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)

Figure 6 Notch-Stimulated T Cells Have Reduced Proliferative Capacity (A) Stimulation of T cells in primary proliferation. Naive T cells were isolated and stimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and either control Ig or anti-Notch 1. Recombinant IL-2 (20 U/ml) was added to the indicated wells. (B) Proliferation of Notch 1-stimulated T cells in secondary responses. T cells were stimulated for 24 hr with plate-bound antibodies to CD3, CD28, and either control Ig or Notch 1. At 24 hr the cells were isolated from the plate and washed in fresh media, and then rested for 7 days. On day 7, the same number of live cells were added to each well and stimulated with APCs and anti-CD3. IL-2 (20 U/ml) was added as indicated. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)

Figure 7 Treatment with Anti-Notch 1 Inhibits T Cell Expansion In Vivo CD4+ T cells were isolated from DO11.10 TCR transgenic mice and labeled with CFSE. The T cells were transferred into BALB/c recipients. The mice were treated with hamster control Ig or anti-Notch 1 and either vehicle alone or vehicle containing the presenilin inhibitor DAPT. The mice were then immunized with OVA 323–339 peptide dissolved in PBS containing 5 μg/ml LPS. Three days following immunization, in vivo proliferative responses were determined by flow cytometry. The shown results are gated on forward scatter, side scatter, and CD4+ events. Immunity 2004 20, 407-415DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00081-0)