Lab-Specific Gene Expression Signatures in Pluripotent Stem Cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPSC Crowdsourcing: A Model for Obtaining Large Panels of Stem Cell Lines for Screening Mahendra Rao Cell Stem Cell Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October.
Advertisements

Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Average Number of Photons
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
The 3D Genome Shapes Up For Pluripotency
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Robert Passier, Christine Mummery  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Guillaume Richard-Carpentier, Guy Sauvageau  Cell Stem Cell 
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Recreating Pluripotency?
Utf1: Goldilocks for ESC Bivalency
Large-Scale Analysis Reveals Acquisition of Lineage-Specific Chromosomal Aberrations in Human Adult Stem Cells  Uri Ben-David, Yoav Mayshar, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Transcriptional Landscape of Cardiomyocyte Maturation
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Anastasia Baryshnikova  Cell Systems 
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Pluripotent Stem Cells and Disease Modeling
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Mapping Gene Expression in Two Xenopus Species: Evolutionary Constraints and Developmental Flexibility  Itai Yanai, Leonid Peshkin, Paul Jorgensen, Marc W.
Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo
Amar M. Singh, Stephen Dalton  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Microglia
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Direct Conversion Provides Old Neurons from Aged Donor’s Skin
Mark H. Chin, Matteo Pellegrini, Kathrin Plath, William E. Lowry 
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Characterising dermis expansion and gene expression changes during mouse development (related to Fig 1)‏ Characterising dermis expansion and gene expression.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Casey Brewer, Elizabeth Chu, Mike Chin, Rong Lu  Cell Reports 
Erosion of Dosage Compensation Impacts Human iPSC Disease Modeling
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Policy Uncertainty and the Conduct of Stem Cell Research
Rahul Karnik, Alexander Meissner  Cell Stem Cell 
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Presentation transcript:

Lab-Specific Gene Expression Signatures in Pluripotent Stem Cells Aaron M. Newman, James B. Cooper  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 258-262 (August 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.016 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genes Differentially Expressed between Early Passage hiPSC and hESC Lines across Four Laboratories, as Reported by Chin et al. The average log2 iPS/ES expression ratios for the 15 genes found by Chin et al. (2009) to represent a conserved hiPSC signature across four laboratories (their Table S5) is shown on the left, and data from two additional labs (three independent experiments) is shown on the right. We include expression data from Chin et al. Table S2, which has additional ESC and iPSC lines compared to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) microarray data set relating to Chin et al. (GSE16654). All GEO data sets were RMA-normalized together (see Experimental Procedures and Table S1),and were averaged across all probe replicates for each gene and all cell lines for each cell type, hiPSC or hESC. Chin et al. expression data were calculated separately for early passage iPSC (hiPSC Early) and late passage iPSC (hiPSC Late) lines. Differential expression was then computed as the mean iPSC expression over hESC expression. Java TreeView (Saldanha, 2004) was used to render the heat map. See also Figure S1. Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 258-262DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.016) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pluripotent Stem Cell Genes Cluster with Laboratory of Origin (A) Gene expression heat map showing the three largest gene expression clusters obtained from clustering the hiPSC and hESC metadata set (Table S1) have patterns that reflect lab-specific clusters (Soldner et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2009 (Yu1 = GSE15175, Yu2 = GSE15176) and Ebert et al., 2009; Masaki et al., 2007, and Park et al., 2008). The Venn diagram shows that 456 of the 1532 genes found in these three gene clusters are also differentially expressed between hESCs and early passage hiPSCs, a statistically significant overlap as determined by Fisher's exact test (p < 10−11). All 1532 genes are provided in Table S2. For genes that overlap with genes reported by Chin et al., see Table S3. (To construct the heat map, we applied median-centering to the RMA-normalized expression profiles of all 1878 [of 2454] probes with corresponding HUGO gene symbols [identified with the HG-U133plus2 legend]. Java TreeView [Saldanha, 2004] was used to render the heat map.) See also Figure S2. (B) Pearson correlation analysis of all 1878 probes from (A) showing that pluripotent cell lines within lab-specific clusters have correlation values > 0.9, indicating that in vitro context influences gene expression patterns in both human iPSCs and ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 258-262DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.016) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Lab-Specific Differences Rendered as a Fuzzy Cluster Network Whole-transcriptome clustering of hiPSC lines, hESC lines, and fibroblast cell lines from eight reprogramming experiments and nine GEO data sets showing distinct laboratory-specific gene expression patterns of pluripotent stem cells (refer to Table S1 for details of the analyzed metadata set). The fuzzy cluster network of AutoSOME clustering results contains seven pluripotent stem cell clusters (hiPSCs = circular nodes; hESCs = square nodes) and one fibroblast cluster (fibroblasts = diamond nodes). All nodes are numbered by cluster label and are colored by GEO data set (light blue = Yu et al., 2009, GSE15175 data set; medium blue = Yu et al., 2009, GSE15176 data set; yellow-green = Ebert et al., 2009, GSE13828 data set; green = Soldner et al., 2009, GSE14711 data set; pink = Masaki et al., 2007, GSE9709 data set; red = Park et al., 2008, GSE9832 data set; orange = Maherali et al., 2008, GSE12390 data set; dark blue = Kim et al., 2009, GSE16093 data set; purple = Chin et al., 2009, GSE16654 data set). The corresponding authors for each publication and data set are listed in the key. The GSE15175, GSE15176 and GSE13828 data sets are all from the Wisconsin lab, and all three GSE data sets utilize the same embryonic stem cell microarray expression data (see Table S1). Edges between nodes (cell lines) are weighted by the pairwise similarity of cell lines as determined by AutoSOME transcriptome clustering, ranging from low similarity (thin, red edge) to high similarity (thick, blue edge). The cluster network was rendered with Cytoscape 2.6.0 (Shannon et al., 2003). Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 258-262DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.016) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions