Quality, Risk Management, and the Future of Higher Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MSCHE Standards: Institutional Effectiveness (7) and Student Learning (14) Dr. Jo Allen, Senior Vice President & Provost Widener University.
Advertisements

Strategy One Provide needs-based, relevant, quality programs, training, and services to individuals and businesses that compete in a global economy.
A Presentation Dr. Joseph G. Burke Fulbright Specialist, Thailand June
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
What’s driving the need for flexible curricula? How are our learners changing and what are their needs/expectations for flexible curricula? QAA Enhancement.
Students’ Involvement in University Administration: The Role of students’ Satisfaction Survey. By: Paul Kwadwo Addo Solomon Panford SEMINAR FOR SENIOR.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Ron Strauss Lynn Williford Jim Dean Office of the Provost.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Building Bridges for Student and Institutional Success Stephen Roche, VP for Student Services Dr. Don Williams, Senior VP for Academic NASPA International.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
A Presentation Dr. Joseph G. Burke Fulbright Specialist, Thailand June 2013.
Importance of Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing Education into Professional Nursing Practice American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Commission.
The Academic Dimension: Geoscience Workforce Crisis P. Geoffrey Feiss, Provost College of William and Mary 2008 GSA Annual Meeting Session
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Developmental Intervention Model Use for student or institution Can be planned or responsive Planned (Disable Student Services) Responsive (Teacher notices.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Vice Provost for Global Affairs and International Studies
Principles of Good Governance
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Ghazala Hashmi, PhD Coordinator Center for Faculty Engagement
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Assessment: Will It Be a “We Have To?” or “We Get To?”
EMU Computer Engineering Dept.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Clinical Sites – Established Programs
Thailand’s Country Report
Higher Education’s 2016 Top 10 IT Issues: Divest, Reinvest,
Addressing Curricular Barriers to Completion
INTEGRATING STUDENT SUCCESS THROUGHOUT YOUR COLLEGE: ARE YOUR SYSTEMS, PROCESSES AND EMPLOYEES ALIGNED?
The 2017 Survey of CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICERS
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Overview of Learning Outcomes
Curriculum and Accreditation
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Curriculum and Accreditation
Essentials of Managing Human Resources 5ce
Strategic Planning: Intentional Stakeholder Engagement Strategies
Helping students know what they know
Illinois Public University Trustees Conference
Understanding the Managed Services Model
Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President
Working with Student Success Data
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Assessment and Accreditation
Engaging Institutional Leadership
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Assessing Student Learning
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Using Learning Gain Data as Evidence for Enhancement
Careers in teaching physical education
February 21-22, 2018.
2009 Student Opinion Survey Results
EMU Computer Engineering Dept.
Fort Valley State University
Navigating Institutional Improvement and Accreditation
US Perspectives on Educational Quality, Assessment, and Accreditation
Learning Strategies WHO BELIEVES: ACADEMIC ADVISING IS TEACHING
Presentation transcript:

Quality, Risk Management, and the Future of Higher Education A Presentation Dr. Joseph G. Burke Fulbright Specialist, Thailand June 2013

Association of Governing Boards (AGB) 2,000 colleges, universities, boards/councils 36,000 individual members Board/Council Members Presidents and Senior Administrators Others Areas of Research Focus Composition, Attitudes and Needs Governance-Administrative Relationships “Best Practices”

Outline Questions and Answers Provide US Education Context Review Quality Movement Dream about Future Identify Ultimate Risk Assessment Questions and Answers

US Higher Education No powerful ministry of education Highly diverse & decentralized Overlapping and sometimes inefficient governing structures Federal State Non-government commissions/agencies University governance board/council Yet system: “best in the world” reputation protects academic freedom Encourages innovation, critical thinking, entrepreneurial behavior © Copyright 2013 | Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges

Core Functions of US Quality Universities #1 Set Ambitious and Clearly Articulated Education Goals #2 Gather Evidence of Student Learning #3 Use Evidence to Improve Student Learning #4 Share Evidence with All Constituencies

Comparison of US and Other Approaches to Quality US tends to disaggregate quality and risk management functions US has far more diversified and de- centralized approach Key concerns are quality, competitiveness, effectiveness of meeting changing occupational requirements

Key Questions for All Universities How Good is our Product What a student knows and can do upon graduation? What is the “value added” by the learning process? How good are we at producing our product? retention, graduation rates, academic performance Are our customers satisfied? alumni satisfaction and performance employer satisfaction Do we have the right mix of majors? Do we make the grade? (Accreditation)

Why Quality Assessment? Prepare our institutions for tomorrow’s world Prepare to do better tomorrow than today

What Will Tomorrow Look and Be Like? The Ultimate Risk Assessment

Challenges Accommodating Technology Innovations Rising Costs & Declining Resources Decreasing Governmental Support Conflict Between Education V Health Care Rising Demands: Lower cost Increase Accessibility, Retention, Graduation Rates Increase Educational Quality Expand Research & involvement Better Prepare Students for Careers Accommodating Technology Innovations

Technological Impacts New technologies allow us to gather, store, analyze, and present more data on an almost exponential basis Hard to keep up with expanding knowledge base Analytics fastest growing technology career Pace of change greatly affects higher education Roles and costs faculty curriculum delivery systems and instructional strategies students classrooms, libraries, and other learning facilities

Ultimate Risk Assessment Key Questions What will the world that we are preparing our students for look like 10, 25, and 50 years from now? How to change university components to best prepare graduates? Graduate learning outcomes Curriculum; Instructional strategies and delivery systems; Faculty; Facilities What to do now to insure changes made in time?

Current Technology Issues Thai tablet distribution policy What kind of students must we prepare for? Different types of learners? Motivation? Learning strategies, pedagogies, and delivery modes? Faculty and staff change? Preparation steps? Facilities? MOOCs Curricula impact?

Conclusion We live in exciting times caused by increasing rate of change and emerging technologies!!! We are fortunate to be educators Our mission in life is extremely important – to educate the next generation of citizens for our nation and our world Life doesn’t get any better than this! Good luck and have fun!!!!

Thank You For Listening!!! Question and Answers Thank You For Listening!!!