Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure-Based Engineering of Angucyclinone 6-Ketoreductases
Advertisements

Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Discovery of Potent and Reversible Monoacylglycerol Lipase Inhibitors
Ambiguous Origin: Two Sides of an Ephrin Receptor Tyrosine Kinase
Ribosome Evolution for Two Artificial Amino Acids in E. coli
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Thomas E. Edwards, Bruce H. Robinson, Snorri Th. Sigurdsson 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Ancestral Protein Reconstruction Yields Insights into Adaptive Evolution of Binding Specificity in Solute-Binding Proteins  Ben E. Clifton, Colin J. Jackson 
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
Highly Efficient Self-Replicating RNA Enzymes
Discovery of Widespread GTP-Binding Motifs in Genomic DNA and RNA
William J. Zuercher, Jonathan M. Elkins, Stefan Knapp 
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Discovery of Potent and Reversible Monoacylglycerol Lipase Inhibitors
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Ribosome Evolution for Two Artificial Amino Acids in E. coli
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Structure-Based Engineering of Angucyclinone 6-Ketoreductases
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
Cristina Esteva-Font, Puay-Wah Phuan, Marc O. Anderson, A.S. Verkman 
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e11 (December 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Ethan B. Butler, Yong Xiong, Jimin Wang, Scott A. Strobel 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
David Rodríguez, José Brea, María Isabel Loza, Jens Carlsson  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Allen R. Buskirk, David R. Liu  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions  Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan,
Peter Man-Un Ung, Rayees Rahman, Avner Schlessinger 
Structure-Based Engineering of Angucyclinone 6-Ketoreductases
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1489-1498 (November 2011) Chemogenomic Discovery of Allosteric Antagonists at the GPRC6A Receptor  David E. Gloriam, Petrine Wellendorph, Lars D. Johansen, Alex Rojas Bie Thomsen, Karina Phonekeo, Daniel Sejer Pedersen, Hans Bräuner-Osborne  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1489-1498 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.012 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2011 18, 1489-1498DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2011 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The 2-Phenyl-Indole Binding Motif Matched against the Protein Sequences of Assayed Receptors Protein sequence alignments of TMH3-6 in GPRC6A (human, mouse, and rat), the 5.24 receptor (goldfish), CaR (human and rat), and 5-HT2C (human). The 2-phenyl-indole binding sequence motif is shown in the top row detailing the residue positions and the moieties they interact with denoted as: indole (I), indole NH (N), and phenyl (P). Position 3.36 has no specific interaction, but should be uncharged. Chemistry & Biology 2011 18, 1489-1498DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.012) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Chemical Structures of Molecules 1–4 Chemical structures of mGPRC6A antagonists 1–3 and an inactive N-methyl analog 4. Chemistry & Biology 2011 18, 1489-1498DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.012) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Pharmacological Characterization of Compounds 1, 3, and 4 on Mouse GPRC6A, Rat CaR and Human 5-HT2A Transiently Expressed in tsA201 Cells (A) Concentration-response curves of 3 on the mouse GPRC6A, rat CaR and human 5-HT2C receptors in the presence of 500 μM l-ornithine (l-Orn), 4 mM Ca2+ and 50 nM serotonin, respectively. (B) Schild analysis of 3: concentration-response curves of l-Orn in the presence of various concentrations of 3 at the mouse GPRC6A receptor. (C) Effect of l-Orn and 3 on wild-type and mutated mouse GPRC6A receptors. (D) Pharmacological characterization of 1 and its N-methylated analog 4 on mouse GPRC6A showing that 1 is an antagonist whereas 4 is inactive. The formation of inositol phosphates was determined as described in Experimental Procedures. Results are expressed as counts per minute and are means ± SD (n = 3). Chemistry & Biology 2011 18, 1489-1498DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.012) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Compound 3 Docked in the Mouse GPRC6A Model Residues are color-coded according to their interacting moiety in the 2-phenyl-indole binding sequence motif; Green: Indole, Red: Indole NH and Blue: Phenyl. Residues are indexed using Ballesteros-Weinstein nomenclature (Ballesteros and Weinstein, 1995). Chemistry & Biology 2011 18, 1489-1498DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.012) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of Evolutionary and Chemogenomic Receptor Relationships A comparison of evolutionary and chemogenomic receptor relationships based on the full TM region (left) or the 2-aryl-indole binding site (right). The trees include 27 Family A GPCRs (black) with known 2-aryl-indole containing ligands and the Family C receptors GPRC6A and CaR (red). Branch lengths indicate receptor (dis)similarities. The trees were produced with Neighbor of the Phylip package using the JTT substitution matrix. Chemistry & Biology 2011 18, 1489-1498DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.012) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions