Promoting in Tandem: The Promoter for Telomere Transposon HeT-A and Implications for the Evolution of Retroviral LTRs  O.N Danilevskaya, I.R Arkhipova,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Advertisements

Recurrent inversion breaking intron 1 of the factor VIII gene is a frequent cause of severe hemophilia A by Richard D. Bagnall, Naushin Waseem, Peter M.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
RHD gene deletion occurred in the Rhesus box
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
by Takashi Kasukabe, Junko Okabe-Kado, and Yoshio Honma
Mutation Spectrum of the Survival of Motor Neuron 1 and Functional Analysis of Variants in Chinese Spinal Muscular Atrophy  Yu-jin Qu, Jin-li Bai, Yan-yan.
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Consequences of T‐DNA insertion on SWP expression in swp mutant.
by Jean-Michel Cayuela, Betty Gardie, and François Sigaux
EM Visualization of Transcription by RNA Polymerase II
LINEs Mobilize SINEs in the Eel through a Shared 3′ Sequence
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Base-Pairing between Untranslated Regions Facilitates Translation of Uncapped, Nonpolyadenylated Viral RNA  Liang Guo, Edwards M. Allen, W.Allen Miller 
Sequencing of t(2;7) Translocations Reveals a Consistent Breakpoint Linking CDK6 to the IGK Locus in Indolent B-Cell Neoplasia  Edward P.K. Parker, Reiner.
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Dragony Fu, Kathleen Collins  Molecular Cell 
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Analysis of Telomerase Processivity
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Short Telomeres in Yeast Are Highly Recombinogenic
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
High Frequency Retrotransposition in Cultured Mammalian Cells
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Structure of the GM2A Gene: Identification of an Exon 2 Nonsense Mutation and a Naturally Occurring Transcript with an In-Frame Deletion of Exon 2  Biao.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Extra chromosomal Agents Transposable elements
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Zongliang Gao, Elena Herrera-Carrillo, Ben Berkhout 
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Sex-Linked period Genes in the Silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Jeremy E. Wilusz, Susan M. Freier, David L. Spector  Cell 
Telomere Dysfunction Increases Mutation Rate and Genomic Instability
Michael J Dye, Nick J Proudfoot  Molecular Cell 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Jingwei Ni, Amy L Tien, Maurille J Fournier  Cell 
Identification of TSIX, Encoding an RNA Antisense to Human XIST, Reveals Differences from its Murine Counterpart: Implications for X Inactivation  Barbara.
Multiple RNA Surveillance Pathways Limit Aberrant Expression of Iron Uptake mRNAs and Prevent Iron Toxicity in S. cerevisiae  Albert Lee, Anthony K. Henras,
Andrew Peters, Ursula Storb  Immunity 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Danna K Morris, Victoria Lundblad  Current Biology 
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Promoting in Tandem: The Promoter for Telomere Transposon HeT-A and Implications for the Evolution of Retroviral LTRs  O.N Danilevskaya, I.R Arkhipova, M.L Pardue, K.L Traverse  Cell  Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages 647-655 (March 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8

Figure 1 HeT-A Elements Form Polar Arrays of Complete and Partial Elements on the Ends of Chromosomes (A) A complete HeT-A repeat (∼6 kb) showing 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR), overlapping open reading frames (ORFs), 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR), and 3′ oligo(A) sequence. HeT-A elements are always found with the 3′ end of the coding strand toward the interior of the chromosome, as expected if reverse transcription is primed by the end of the chromosomal DNA. (B) Documented example of the formation of a polar array of HeT-A on healed chromosome ends. The terminally deleted X chromosome in the RT394 stock had been healed by transposition of a HeT-A element. When first analyzed (DNA from 1987), this chromosome had ∼3 kb of the 3′ end of HeT-A attached by an (A)4 junction to a break in the yellow gene (Biessmann et al. 1990). In 1990, starting with a stock that had only 450 bp of that first HeT-A element remaining on the chromosome, Biessmann et al. 1992 isolated new transpositions onto this end over a period of several generations. The chromosome shown is one from their study. The broken end of the yellow gene is indicated (right). Attached to this end by an (A)4 junction is a small box representing the remaining sequence of the first HeT-A element. A new transposition is joined to nt 260 of the old element with an (A)17 junction. (Other transpositions differed in the site of joining and in the length of the (A)n junction; e.g., one joined to nt 395 with (A)4 and another joined to nt 428 with (A)1. Chromosomes in this study acquired 3–12 kb of new DNA, but distal regions were not analyzed.) This figure shows what we suppose was the initial step in the second transposition on each chromosome, a complete repeat of HeT-A attached to the truncated element already on the chromosome. The question mark at the 5′ end of the new element represents important questions about HeT-A: What happens at the very end? How is the second strand of HeT-A DNA initiated, since reverse transcription of the first strand is primed off the end of the chromosome? For an example of an array of complete HeT-A elements, see Figure 2. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 2 Constructs Used for Analyses of Promoter Activity in HeT-A Sequences (Top) The Drosophila DNA cloned in λ23Zn, showing the complete central HeT-A element, 23–1, flanked by the 5′ end of truncated element 23–2 and the 3′ end of a third truncated element upstream. Hatched boxes represent 5′ noncoding sequences; open boxes with arrows represent coding regions; and dotted boxes represent 3′ noncoding regions. Arrowheads represent the oligo(A) sequences at the 3′ end of each element. Arrowheads are double because each of the junctions in this clone has two oligo(A) tails separated by tiny 3′ HeT-A ends. (Bottom) Shown below the cloned fragment are sequences tested in the reporter construct. The length of each tested fragment is indicated by the number of the terminal nucleotide on either end. (Oligo(A) tails are not included in this numbering.) The distance measured 3′ to 5′ in element 23–1 begins with the first nucleotide 5′ of the 23–1 oligo(A) tail and is given as a negative number; the distance measured 5′ to 3′ in element 23–2 begins with the first nucleotide after the upstream oligo(A) tail and is given as a positive number. The largest construct was taken from the junction of elements 23–1 and 23–2 and contained bp −590 to +646. Cells transfected with this construct were included in every experiment, and all measurements are given relative to the activity of this large construct in the same experiment (see Table 1). Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 3 Analyses of Promoter Activity of HeT-A Elements in the λT-A Clone This clone differs from others studied by much sequence rearrangement and decay of the coding sequence, suggesting that it represents very old transpositions. Sequences on both sides of the junction between T-A1 (downstream) and T-A2 (upstream), analyzed in reporter constructs, are diagrammed. Conventions as in Figure 2. Activity is expressed relative to the construct used to normalize activity in Table 1. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 4 Northern Blot Hybridization Analyses of RNA from Constructs Carrying Segments of HeT-A Sequence (Top) Total RNA was fractionated on an agarose gel, transferred to a membrane, and probed for the bacterial lacZ sequences. The goal was to measure the length of the transcripts. Because miniprep RNA was used, lanes were not loaded exactly equally. Bands above the 7.5 kb RNA size marker are plasmid DNA. Bands between 4.4 and 7.5 kb are the transcripts of those plasmids. Plasmids differed only in the promoter sequences; therefore the length of each RNA permits a rough estimation of the site of transcript initiation (assuming no systematic variation in the length of poly(A) added). Lane M, RNA markers in kilobases. Lane C, control RNA from cells expressing pC188lacZ101–14 (Cherbas et al. 1991). Because the start site is known, this RNA can be calculated to be 4450 nt in length. Lane 1, RNA from the cells carrying construct bp −590 to −1 (see Figure 2). From the experiment in Figure 5, the RNA is calculated to be 4480–4510 nt long (depending on the transcription start site used). Lane 2, RNA from cells expressing construct bp −590 to +97. RNA can be calculated to be 4633–4663 nt long if transcription start sites are as for other constructs. Lane 3, RNA from cells expressing construct bp −590 to +646. This RNA should be 5180–5210 nt long according to the experiment in Figure 5. Lane 4, RNA from cells expressing construct bp −590 to −320, which lacks the presumed transcription start site (see Figure 5). This construct yields no RNA product. RNA lengths in lanes 2–4 are consistent with the supposition that all of these promoters use the same start sites. (Bottom) HeT-A sequences in constructs used for lanes 1–4. Conventions as in Figure 2. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 5 Results of Primer Extension Analyses of RNA from HeT-A Constructs (a) The primer for these experiments was complementary to the 5′ noncoding sequence of HeT-A. It detected RNAs initiated at nt −31 and −62 in the 3′ end of the upstream HeT-A in total RNA from cells transfected with the bp −590 to +646 construct (lane 1, RNAs indicated by arrowheads). The sequencing lanes (A, G, C, and T) show the sequence generated from the bp −590 to +646 construct with the primer used for the RNA in lanes 1 and 2. This sequence gives a precise assay for the start site of RNA transcribed from this construct. This primer also extends an RNA that appears to be 5 nt longer than the transcript beginning at nt −62. This RNA is from endogenous HeT-A elements and is also found in nontransfected Schneider line 2 cells (lane 2). Because different HeT-A elements differ in the number of A residues in the oligo(A) junction and because RNAs starting with the same nucleotide in the 3′ region therefore differ in length if transcribed from different elements, we cannot determine the exact start site of the endogenous RNA from this assay. Note that the sequence in lane A fades, and the upper part of the lane shows only shadows from adjacent lane G. Fading occurs because the sequence extended from this promoter is very biased, leading to early exhaustion of the dideoxynucleotide for this lane in the kit used for the DNA sequencing. The G, C, and T lanes are identical to other sequencing gels of this region, which have complete A lanes. (b) Extension with primer complementary to the 5′ coding sequence of lacZ. This primer did not give an extension product on RNA from nontransfected cells (lane 1) or from cells transfected with the inactive promoter, bp −560 to −320 (lane 2). However, with the bp −560 to −1 construct (lane 3), primer extension showed transcripts initiated at nt −31 and −62 (indicated by arrowheads). Thus, two different promoter constructs and two different primers give the same two sites of transcription for HeT-A. (c) Partial sequence for the primer extension shown in (a). Shown are nt −69 to +204 from the construct directing transcription in the transformed cells (the bp −590 to +646 construct). The two transcription start sites at nt −62 and −31 in the sequence of the upstream element are indicated. −1 denotes the last nucleotide in the sequence of the upstream element. This is followed by a 19 nt repeat of the 3′ end (see Figure 6) flanked by two oligo(A) tails and then 204 nt of the 5′ end of the downstream HeT-A element. The last 17 nt of the sequence shown are complementary to the primer used for extension on the RNA. The primer sequence is shown in bold. (d) Partial sequence for the primer extension shown in (b). Shown are nt −69 to −1 from the construct directing transcription in the transformed cells (the bp −590 to −1 construct). The two transcription start sites at nt −62 and −31 in the sequence of the upstream element are indicated. −1 denotes the last nucleotide in the sequence of the upstream element. This is followed by 101 nt of the plasmid running from the polylinker insertion site for HeT-A into the lacZ sequence. The last 16 nt of the sequence shown are complementary to the primer used for extension on the RNA. The primer sequence is shown in bold. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 5 Results of Primer Extension Analyses of RNA from HeT-A Constructs (a) The primer for these experiments was complementary to the 5′ noncoding sequence of HeT-A. It detected RNAs initiated at nt −31 and −62 in the 3′ end of the upstream HeT-A in total RNA from cells transfected with the bp −590 to +646 construct (lane 1, RNAs indicated by arrowheads). The sequencing lanes (A, G, C, and T) show the sequence generated from the bp −590 to +646 construct with the primer used for the RNA in lanes 1 and 2. This sequence gives a precise assay for the start site of RNA transcribed from this construct. This primer also extends an RNA that appears to be 5 nt longer than the transcript beginning at nt −62. This RNA is from endogenous HeT-A elements and is also found in nontransfected Schneider line 2 cells (lane 2). Because different HeT-A elements differ in the number of A residues in the oligo(A) junction and because RNAs starting with the same nucleotide in the 3′ region therefore differ in length if transcribed from different elements, we cannot determine the exact start site of the endogenous RNA from this assay. Note that the sequence in lane A fades, and the upper part of the lane shows only shadows from adjacent lane G. Fading occurs because the sequence extended from this promoter is very biased, leading to early exhaustion of the dideoxynucleotide for this lane in the kit used for the DNA sequencing. The G, C, and T lanes are identical to other sequencing gels of this region, which have complete A lanes. (b) Extension with primer complementary to the 5′ coding sequence of lacZ. This primer did not give an extension product on RNA from nontransfected cells (lane 1) or from cells transfected with the inactive promoter, bp −560 to −320 (lane 2). However, with the bp −560 to −1 construct (lane 3), primer extension showed transcripts initiated at nt −31 and −62 (indicated by arrowheads). Thus, two different promoter constructs and two different primers give the same two sites of transcription for HeT-A. (c) Partial sequence for the primer extension shown in (a). Shown are nt −69 to +204 from the construct directing transcription in the transformed cells (the bp −590 to +646 construct). The two transcription start sites at nt −62 and −31 in the sequence of the upstream element are indicated. −1 denotes the last nucleotide in the sequence of the upstream element. This is followed by a 19 nt repeat of the 3′ end (see Figure 6) flanked by two oligo(A) tails and then 204 nt of the 5′ end of the downstream HeT-A element. The last 17 nt of the sequence shown are complementary to the primer used for extension on the RNA. The primer sequence is shown in bold. (d) Partial sequence for the primer extension shown in (b). Shown are nt −69 to −1 from the construct directing transcription in the transformed cells (the bp −590 to −1 construct). The two transcription start sites at nt −62 and −31 in the sequence of the upstream element are indicated. −1 denotes the last nucleotide in the sequence of the upstream element. This is followed by 101 nt of the plasmid running from the polylinker insertion site for HeT-A into the lacZ sequence. The last 16 nt of the sequence shown are complementary to the primer used for extension on the RNA. The primer sequence is shown in bold. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 6 Sequences of Very Truncated Elements at 5′ Ends of Complete Elements Each truncated element is believed actually to represent the 5′ terminal redundancy of the RNA reverse transcribed to give the element just 3′ of it. That RNA would have initiated at nt −62 or −31, and therefore, in each case, the reverse transcript has lost some nucleotides, either during reverse transcription or while this sequence was the extreme end of the chromosome, before transposition of the next HeT-A element. (First line) For comparison, this line shows sequence from the 3′ end of a complete HeT-A element, 23–1, beginning at nt −38. (This region of the HeT-A sequence is strongly conserved in all elements sequenced to date.) nt −1 is followed by an oligo(A)6 in 23–1. (Second through fourth lines) Sequences of the two truncated elements found between elements in the λ23Zn clone (the sequences between double arrowheads at each junction in Figure 2) and the one in the λT-A clone. For each, the 3′ oligo(A) tail is shown at right and the 3′ oligo(A) tail of the element immediately upstream is shown at left. The short element between A3 and A20 comes from the junction between elements 23–3 and 23–1. The short element between A6 and A19 comes from the junction between elements 23–1 and 23–2 and has the A6 tail of 23–1 seen in the top line. The short element between A8 and A3 comes from λT-A. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)

Figure 7 The Downstream Promoter of HeT-A Has Features of a Proto-LTR Two tandem HeT-A elements, using conventions indicated in Figure 1. The region of the downstream element with maximal promoter activity is outlined by an arrowhead, and the equivalent region of the element that will be transcribed is marked similarly to indicate the formal similarity to an LTR. The start of HeT-A transcription within the upstream element is shown. In the RNA transcript, the black segments on either end indicate terminal redundancy produced because transcription starts in sequence identical to that at the 3′ end of the element. Cell 1997 88, 647-655DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81907-8)