PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) status and plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

IHEP,Protvino,Russia 1 Current status of a gas luminosity monitor Sergei Erin † † For the LCAL group V.Bezzubov,S.Erin, A.Ferapontov, Yu.Gilitsky,V.Korablev,
Proton test facilities Uppsala, TSL, GWC, B-line (Blue hall): Energy ±0.80 MeV. Flux reduced from normal 2·10 8 s -1 to 900 s -1 with a profile as.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Proposal for IHEP participation in CBM ECAL
The HyCal Calorimeter A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  The crystal modules  The frame and transporter  Temperature stability.
INSTR-08, BINP, Novosibirsk 1 Belle calorimeter upgrade B.Shwartz, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk on behalf of BELLE calorimeter.
Status of EIC Calorimeter R&D at BNL EIC Detector R&D Committee Meeting January 13, 2014 S.Boose, J.Haggerty, E.Kistenev, E,Mannel, S.Stoll, C.Woody PHENIX.
PWO/APD Activities at Hiroshima U. Kenta Shigaki (Hiroshima University) 20 July 2004 at CERN.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Shashlik type calorimeter for SHIP experiment
PANDA electromagnetic calorimeters Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group INSTR08 28 Feb - 05 Mar 2008.
PWO/APD/CSP Development at Hiroshima U. Hiroshima ALICE-PHOS Group (T.Sugitate, K.Shigaki, et al.) 17 August, 2004, at CERN.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
Ondřej Svoboda for the ECAL group HADES collaboration meeting XXV, 19 – 23 November 2012 GSI.
0 The LHCb Hadron Calorimeter Rustem Dzhelyadin, (IHEP, Protvino) INSTR02 Conference, BNPI, Novosibirsk, Russia Contents: Œ Design overview  Trigger with.
ECAL LED monitoring system upgrade Pavel Shatalov ITEP, Moscow, Russia Yuri Guz IHEP Protvino, Russia.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Status and R&D development of Photon Calorimeter G. Atoian, S. Dhawan, V. Issakov, A. Poblaguev, M. Zeller, Physics Department, Yale University, New Haven,
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100 Pavel Tlustý, NPI Řež Motivation Plans Current status Tests Outlook HADES Collaboration Meeting, Sesimbra,
PbWO 4 crystals Calorimeter Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
TDR for the PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino PANDA Collaboration Meeting, Giessen 20 March 2015.
Status of the PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino PANDA-Russia Workshop FRRC, Moscow 27 May 2015.
Sergey BarsukElectromagnetic Calorimeter for 1 Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the LHCb experiment Perugia, Italy March 29 – April 2, 2004 ECAL CALO Sergey.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) Status Dmitry Morozov, IHEP (Protvino) PANDA LV Collaboration Meeting Nov 30 – Dec Vienna, Austria.
Shashlyk DAQ and FEE Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA DAQ and FEE Workshop, Rauischholzhausen Castle.
1 SoLID Collaboration Meeting, July 9-10, 2014 Electromagnetic Calorimeters (EC) for SoLID The SoLID EC Working Group SoLID Collaboration Meeting July.
HADES collaboration meeting XXX, Lisbon, 7-10 October, 2015,
for the HADES Collaboration
Activities and Results from PNPI GATCHINA
Oleksiy Dolinskyy December 1st, 2014
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
P.Kooijman, UVA-GRAPPA, UU, Nikhef
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics
The ATLAS Zero Degree Calorimeter Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA
EUDET JRA3, Activity Obninsk State University
NRC Kurchatov Institute, ITEP I. Korolko, M.Prokudin, Yu.Zaitsev
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
IHEP group in PANDA physics: status and requests
CLAS12 software workshop
LHCC referees’ questions, comments, requests
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
 Results from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector
CMS Goal of the experiment
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Tutorial in Mechanical Properties
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
LHCb HCAL: performance and calibration
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Mechanical Properties: 1
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
Jerzy Pietraszko, HADES at SIS100 - status GSI Darmstadt, Germany
Presentation transcript:

PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) status and plans 28 Jan 2005 PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI 8 June 2016

Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI 28 Jan 2005 Outline FSC TDR status FSC new prototype tests DCS and monitoring system development Possible FSC production schedule 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI FSC TDR status Two rounds of questions-answers with ECE panel at the beginning of the 2016 Simulations results Load on the bottom layer of the modules Details of the modules manufacturing process and QA Final acceptance of FSC TDR: March of 2016 Formal request was send to the FAIR management to assign Collaboration Contract for the PANDA FSC construction to IHEP Protvino 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

ECE panel questions on simulation results Fig 7.6 of the TDR showed invariant mass spectrum of the photon pairs from pi0 decays with the energy of pi0 up to 15 GeV into the FSC acceptance. The question on origin of the low energy tail. Additional simulation showed the origin of the tail is from the large numbers of the registered at FSC clusters, which increases with energy. It seems, the reason is an EM-shower formation somewhere before the FSC. If we select the events with number of clusters below seven, the low energies tail background disappears 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

ECE panel questions on simulation results To prove the reconstruction performance at low energies a set of simulations was done for the pi0 energies 20-50 MeV (=14 MeV) , 50-100 MeV (=13 MeV) , 100-1000 MeV (=7 MeV) an 1-15 GeV (=5 MeV) At least one photon goes to the FSC 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI Bottom module load Since the FSC modules are placed over each other as a stack it was a worry about the stability of the bottom module optical properties. The stress is distributed uniformly over the module surface, which resulted in pressure to the bottom module of 0.046 MPa (average). Taking into account the holes in the tile one can calculate the effective average pressure increase up to 0.053 MPa. Stress concentration at holes is three times more – 0.16 MPa. Comparing this stress with tensile strength and ball indentation hardness from the table of BASF-143 properties, provided by manufacturer, we can see the safety factor of several orders of magnitude. Density 1.043 g/cm3 Tensile Modulus (Young Modulus) 3.30 GPa Poisson ratio 0.22 Tensile Strength, Ultimate 46 MPa Flexural Strength, Ultimate (Yield?) 72 MPa Elongation at Break 2 % Ball indentation Hardness : H at 358N/30c (Ball diameter D=5 mm, Fm=358 N, Time=30c) 150 MPa (indentation depth 0.167 mm) 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

FSC new prototype (no Tyvek) tests The complete readout chain in triggerless mode, trigger at software level as a coincidence of 4 cells signals Signal sampling by one SIS3316‐250‐14 ADC utilizing feature extraction algorithm Study long-term stability and longitudinal homogeneity Quality control for production (24 modules at once – requires 3 ADCs and 48 PMTs 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI 7

Light Monitoring System development In the frame of developments for the DCS (Sofia Bukreeva’s report at DCS session) one more task for the FSC DCS was added - to watch the LMS LED stability. Electronics prototype (stable photodiode detector with microcontroller system and interface to EPICS IOC) was developed and tested The precision is about 2-3% which is not enough for the high precision monitoring system, but we still have room for improvement 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI CW bases modification To measure actual HV set we are going to include ADC chips in the CW HV bases (Sofia Bukreeva’s talk on DCS session) To avoid radiation damage problems with ADC we’ve selected rad.hard ADC chips (gamma and neutrons irradiation) ADC chips from TI was selected Irradiation up to 56 krad Recovery 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI

Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI Schedule End of 2016 - get a signed Collaboration contract of IHEP-Protvino with FAIR to produce the FSC at IHEP Protvino; January 2017 - December 2020 - the four years Collaboration contract of IHEP with FAIR on the FSC by using the Russian contributed money into FAIR; January 2017-June 2017 materials procurement, tooling production July 2017 – Decemeber 2017 Pre-series prototype build and test January 2018- December 2019 - manufacture parts,assemble and test all modules, ship it to Germany July 2017 – December 2018 - manufacture all the mechanical support parts in Russia and ship it to Germany; 2018 - purchase the photomultipliers and ship them directly from the manufacturer to Germany; 2018 - purchase the readout electronics (Uppsala University) and ship it to Germany; 2020 installation at PANDA hall and comissioning 8 June 201 Pavel Semenov, PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI