Fig. 3. Mice which experienced MS or MSEW did not exhibit impairments in hippocampal and amygdala-dependent fear-related emotional memories. In the acquisition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancement of auditory fear conditioning after housing in a complex environment is attenuated by prior treatment with amphetamine Lisa A. Briand, Terry.
Advertisements

BNST lesions aggravate behavioral despair but do not impair navigational learning in rats Pezük, Göz, Aksoy, Canbeyli Brain Research Bulletin-2006.
Discriminative Auditory Fear Learning Requires Both Tuned and Nontuned Auditory Pathways to the Amygdala Raquel Antunes and Marta A. Moita Champalimaud.
Electrical Synapses Control Hippocampal Contributions to Fear Learning and Memory Stephanie Bissiere, Moriel Zelikowsky, Ravikumar Ponnusamy, Nathan S.
Subdivisions of Human Memory DECLARATIVE (EXPLICIT) NONDECLARATIVE (IMPLICIT) FACTS EVENTS PROCEDURAL (SKILLS AND HABITS) PRIMING SIMPLE CLASSICAL.
Powerpoint slides from “Mechanisms of Memory” Class Web site (should be up next week)
Pavlovian, Observational and Instructed Fear Learning: Emotional Responses to Unmasked and Masked Stimuli Andreas Olsson, Kristen Stedenfeld & Elizabeth.
Indelibility of Subcortical Emotional Memories Joseph E. LeDoux Lizabeth Romanski Andrew Xagorasis Laboratory of Neurobiology Cornell University Medical.
Fear Conditioning Michael Davis’ Ponca Symposium Presentation (notes from)
Brian L. Thomas, Ph.D. Baldwin-Wallace College Berea, Ohio USA.
Acquisition curve of Eyeblink CR
LECTURE 19: ANATOMICAL & FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF LEARNING & MEMORY REQUIRED READING: Kandel text, Chapter 62 LEARNING: The process through which an.
Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Emotional Perseveration: The Memory for Prior Extinction Training Maria A. Morgan, Jay Schulkin, Joseph E. LeDoux.
Becoming Extinct. Extinction of Conditioned behavior Extinction is a typical part of the learning process – Pavlovian or Instrumental contingency can.
Olson Lab Group Meeting Charles Benson Paper Presentation – Jan 22, 2016.
 Endocannabinoids: Learning, & Memory Clarissa Staton Endocannabinoids Seminar 2015.
Volume 42, Pages (January 2015)
Prior cocaine exposure disrupts extinction of fear conditioning
Fig. 1. Infarct size and behavioral outcomes in response to single and repeated treatment of hUCB-MSCs after MCAO. (A) Schematic of the time schedule.
Fig. 2. Severities of seizures by durations and daily frequency at different time points. (A) An example of seizure activity in EEG recording. (B) Seizure.
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
Emotional memory: What does the amygdala do?
Elizabeth A. Phelps, Joseph E. LeDoux  Neuron 
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
N. Samuel, A.H. Taub, R. Paz, A. Raz  British Journal of Anaesthesia 
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Impaired fear extinction precedes memory decline in Fmn2 mutant mice
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron 
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Distinct long-term neurocognitive outcomes after equipotent sevoflurane or isoflurane anaesthesia in immature rats  T.M. Ramage, F.L. Chang, J. Shih,
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
An Animal Model of a Behavioral Intervention for Depression
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Patricio T Huerta, Linus D Sun, Matthew A Wilson, Susumu Tonegawa 
Comment on “Multiple repressive mechanisms in the hippocampus during memory formation” by Rebecca S. Mathew, Hillary Mullan, Jan Krzysztof Blusztajn, and.
III. Animal behaviour testing: memory
Genetic Dissection of Presynaptic and Postsynaptic BDNF-TrkB Signaling in Synaptic Efficacy of CA3-CA1 Synapses  Pei-Yi Lin, Ege T. Kavalali, Lisa M.
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 1999)
Fig. 1. MS and MSEW mice did not exhibit depression-related behavior compared to controls. There was no significant difference in the time spent stationary.
Fig. 3. OPNpt20 binding to αv integrin in BV2 cells
Fig. 2. High density EEG of anterior and posterior spindles
Genetic inhibition of PKA in the adult impairs memory for contextual fear conditioning. Genetic inhibition of PKA in the adult impairs memory for contextual.
Fig. 2. Induction of F-actin polymerization by OPNpt20
Fig. 3. Relationship between the generalization of conscious feeling induced by fear conditioning and individual anxiety (or depression) level. To determine.
Fig. 4. Activations of FAK, Erk, and Akt pathways by OPNpt20
Fig. 3. Comparing between source localization algorithms
Fig. 1. Changes in hippocampal matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2) expression over time following bilateral common carotid artery.
Fig. 3. GABA content was increased in reactive astrocytes from 3D culture and hippocampal brain slice. (A) Immunostaining of neuron-astrocyte 3D co-culture.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of behavioral procedures
Fig. 3. Effects of RP on SPS-CF stress-induced memory impairment of spatial memory. (A) Latency to find hidden platform in Morris water maze during 5 daily.
Fig. 1. HFD-induced obesity in C58BL/6 mice and decrease of general and motor behavior in HFD-fed mice. (A) HFD-fed, 5-week-old C57BL/6 mice (n=6/group)
Fig. 1. Induction of microglial cell motility by OPNpt20
Fig. 4. Chronic microwave treatment produced changes in glucose and corticosterone levels in blood. (A) Blood glucose levels of mice subjected to chronic.
Fig. 10. Summary of astrocyte specificity and coverage of hGFAP-CreERT2 in various brain regions. (A) Schematic sagittal section diagram shows heterogeneous.
Fig. 4. A theoretical model of a neural interfacing system to recover neural functions after brain injuries by neuro-prosthetic treatments. A schematic.
Fig. 7 FAE-20 increases hippocampal excitability and leads to more stable contextual fear memory in mice. FAE-20 increases hippocampal excitability and.
Fig. 8. Scriptaid and RGFP966 have no effect on functional recovery, lesion size or demyelinated area after SCI. BALB/c mice were subjected to a T-cut.
Fig. 9. Scriptaid and RGFP966 have no effect on Iba-+1 and CD4+ cell immune cell infiltration after SCI. BALB/c mice were subjected to a T-cut hemisection.
Fig. 4. Dopaminergic signaling pathways are impaired in Ewsr1 KO (−/−) mice at 3 weeks of age. (A) qPCR analysis showed that Th mRNA was significantly.
Irreplaceability of Neuronal Ensembles after Memory Allocation
Fig. 3. hALDH1L1 promoter-driven Cre recombinase-mediated tdTomato expression in BLA. (A) Low magnification images of injection area in amygdala. Each.
Fig. 2. E-LTP is impaired in Rev-erbα KO mice during the subjective night. (A) The input-output relationships at SC-CA1 synapses showed no significant.
Fig. 5. Phagocytosis of zymosan particles by BV2 cells
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Fig. 3. Mice which experienced MS or MSEW did not exhibit impairments in hippocampal and amygdala-dependent fear-related emotional memories. In the acquisition phase of the fear conditioning test, there were no significant difference between (A) MS and MC mice and (B) MSEW and MC mice in the percent freezing time when exposed to the conditioned stimulus (tone) paired with the unconditioned stimulus (foot shock). Habit, Habituation; US, Unconditioned Stimulus; CS, Conditioned Stimulus. Three mice from the MC group in the MSEW cohort were excluded for severe injuries. During the contextual fear recall 24 hours after training, there were no significant differences between (C) MS and MC mice and (D) MSEW and MC mice on percent freezing time. During the cue fear recall 24 hours after training, there was also no significant differences between (E) MS and MC mice and (F) MSEW and MC mice on percent freezing time. One mice from MS and MSEW group were each excluded as outliers for low freezing responses. All values are means±SEM. Fig. 3. Mice which experienced MS or MSEW did not exhibit impairments in hippocampal and amygdala-dependent fear-related emotional memories. In the acquisition phase of the fear conditioning test, there were no significant difference between (A) MS and MC mice and (B) MSEW and MC mice in the percent freezing time when exposed to the conditioned stimulus (tone) paired. . . Exp Neurobiol. 2017 Dec;26(6):390-398. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.6.390