Examining ASL interpretations of the National Anthem: how have the interpretations changed from the 1990’s to now? By Devon Lyons Introduction This research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MASTER ASL! IMPORTANT THINGS TO KNOW….
Advertisements

Sign Language SIGN LANGUAGE Used primarily by hearing-impaired people, Uses a different medium: hands, face, and eyes (rather than vocal tract or ears).
Sign Language.
Linguistic Transference and Interference: Interpreting Between English and ASL Jeffrey Davis Davis, Jeffrey E Linguistic transference and interference:
Assessing Reading: Meeting Year 3 Expectations
ASL I RICHLAND HS J. PARMLEY BIRDVILLE ISD The Structure and Function of ASL.
LAS LINKS DATA ANALYSIS. Objectives 1.Analyze the 4 sub-tests in order to understand which academic skills are being tested. 2.Use sample tests to practice.
Unit 6 Notes. Fingerspelling and Numbers First, using fingerspelling as part of your language gives you the fluency needed to understand fingerspelling.
Sign Language – 5 Parameters Sign Language has an internal structure. They can be broken down into smaller parts. These parts are called the PARAMETERS.
ASL Children’s Story. The goal is to enhance your skills with the storytelling genre of ASL literature.
What is American Sign Languague? Mrs. McClure. Introduction to ASL It is NOT universal It is NOT English There are several different sign languages but.
Lesson EIGHT Study Guide. Vocabulary Practice vocab one vocab two vocab three vocab four vocab five vocab six vocab seven vocab eight vocab nine vocab.
Writing a literature review, Stewart McKinney,2008.
Practice Quiz. A Lesson on Language One of the features that make language unique is the set of symbols that can be broken down into smaller parts.
Linguistics of ASL ASL is a very complex language capable of expressing intricate and abstract ideas thanks to its completeness and also its flexibility.
Semester 1 Final Test Review
Introduction to Aural Rehabilitation Lisa Bowers, Ph.D. CCC-SLP.
By Jennifer Smith Discussion/Conclusion Introduction
Miss Amorin Language Arts SAT
Gallaudet University INT 492, Spring 2017
Fingerspelling Differences:
Pre-Kindergarten Scope & Sequence Unit 8: Spring is in the Air
Do numbers spoken in the source language impact the amount of time it takes interpreters to process the source information before they can produce it?
The Five Parameters of ASL
PSSA ELA Item Type Training Text-Dependent Analysis
Non-Manual Signals (NMS): What they mean and how do we interpret them?
Jovana Milosavljevic Ardeljan PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
INT 492, Spring 2017 by India Hitchcock Introduction
(things that make one sign different from another)
By Sheila Jackson, INT , Spring 2016 LITERATURE REVIEW
By Lola Phan INT 492 SPRING 2016 INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Introduction Interpreting still in its infancy as a profession
Types of Repairs Used During ASL-to-English Voiced Interpretations
Discussion Data CollecHon Literature Review Conclusion Findings
Processing Time in Medical Settings
An investigation of educational interpreters in the classroom:
Kenneth Baclawski et. al. PSB /11/7 Sa-Im Shin
Chapter 15 Gestures and Sign Languages
Structure and Planning
Parts of an Academic Paper
American Sign Language
Waiting on the World to Change
Guidelines for Green Computing projects
Unit 4 Introducing the Study.
Are there any Interpreter Education Programs for Heritage Signers/Coda Learners? Marianne T. Doremus, INT 492 Senior Seminar Project & Portfolio, Spring.
Comparative Essay.
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Limitations & Suggestions
CSc4730/6730 Scientific Visualization
Obj. 2.2 Discuss considerations involved before, during and after an interview To view this presentation, first, turn up your volume and second, launch.
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Conversational ProTactile v. Interpreted ProTactile
By Daisy Jo Robinson, INT492, Spring 2016
Analysis of English “to be” verbs in ASL interpretations
ASL presenters and Hearing Interpreters: Equivalent Pace?
FCE (FIRST CERTIFICATE IN ENGLISH) General information.
By Savannah Hiatt INT 492, Spring 2017 Introduction
Interpreting Strategies when Gestures Occur in the ASL Source
Book Of Choice Final Report
Differentiating Between Depiction Use of DI’s and HI’s
Tabatha Podleiszek INT Spring 2017 Introduction Conclusion Results
CONCLUSION & DISCUSSION
EXPOSITION EXTENDED PLOT STRUCTURE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
Style Sentence Variation.
Requirements Analysis Techniques
Discussion and Findings
The Grammar – Translation Method
Literature Walk Recount/Summarize Fiction SECONDARY WALKS
ASCII and Unicode.
Writing to Discuss / Argue – Steps to Success
Presentation transcript:

Examining ASL interpretations of the National Anthem: how have the interpretations changed from the 1990’s to now? By Devon Lyons Introduction This research focuses on the comparison of five different ASL interpretations of the National Anthem from the Super Bowl. The years of the performances include: Super Bowl XXVII (1993), XXXIII (1998), XLVII (2013), XLVIII (2014) and XLIX (2015). A closer look was taken at how the ASL interpretation of the National Anthem has changed over the years. Traditionally, a frozen text like the National Anthem “is the same each time it is rendered” (Alcorn & Humphrey, p.17). Since ASL does not have a written form (Alcorn & Humphrey, p.190), it could be a contributing factor to the lack of standardization in the interpretation of the National Anthem. Therefore, the performances of the National Anthem in ASL vary much more than the version that it sung. Methodology Dividing the five videos into two eras, the 1990’s and the 2000’s. By choosing a couple videos from each era, the language features that were unique to it’s era would be made more prominent. To begin the search for the videos, different combinations of the key words: “ASL”, “interpretation”, “Super Bowl + (year)” in YouTube were used. When the five videos were analyzed, the lyrics of the National Anthem were typed out along with the ASL gloss of each interpretation. The lyrics and ASL gloss were printed with a color coding system to identify similarities in each era. Thus, configuring a table to display the results (below). Recommendations for further research Looking at a larger number of ASL interpretations may provide stronger evidence of results. Interviews with the interpreters could provide more insight as to why they made the sign choices they did. A researcher with more knowledge of ASL linguistics can better identify ASL features and conclude more valid results. Results Conclusion This research showed plausibility that the 1990’s era incorporated more Signed English and Contact Sign features while the 2000’s era used more ASL features. It seems as though the National Anthem interpretations from the 2000’s era incorporated more ASL features: depiction and blends. Literature Review Alcorn and Humphrey go into great detail about frozen texts: what settings they typically come up in, the vocabulary and sentence structure, turn-taking rules, rate and volume, and common speaker goals. (p. 17-19) References Alcorn, B., Humphries, J. (2007). So You Want to be An Interpreter? An Introduction to Sign Language Interpreting, (4th Ed.). p.17-19, 95, 190. Seattle, WA: H & H Publishing Co. Signed English incorporates “all prepositions, conjunctions, prefixes, suffixes, and verb forms, following the structure of English rather than ASL” (Alcorn & Humphrey, p.95). Edmond, T. (2015). Treshelle Edmond Super Bowl 2015 National Anthem with John Legend. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6iyLwOdi7w Contact sign incorporates similar linguistic features such as: “English word order, the use of prepositions, constructions with that, English expressions, and mouthing of English words, as well as ASL nonmanual signals, body and eye gaze, Flag Watermark Retrieved from: http://www.franciscanmissionaries.com/current-event/election- prayer-2/attachment/waving-american-flag-graphics-4-1/ and ASL use of space” (Valli et al, p. 193). Kramertony. (2015). Superbowl 27 - Anthem - Garth Brooks - (flyover). Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xAlYYZni4 Discussion Depiction is a feature in which signers use the whole upper body – hands, arms, face, etc. – to represent people’s actions (Valli et al, p.142). The ASL interpretations from Super Bowl XXVII (1993) and XXXIII (1998) showed more evidence of Signed English and Contact Sign. Features such as prepositions (THAT and IN) and initialized signs (ROCKET (R) and FREE (F)) appeared in the 1990’s era but not in the 2000’s era. There is a strong correlation between the three videos in the 2000 era and the use of ASL features. Interpretations from Super Bowl XLVII (2013), XLVIII (2014) and XLIX (2015) all used depiction when interpreting “thru the perilous fight,” signing WAR toward their bodies. Blends were also used at other various times in the interpretations. One example would be ROCKET-BURST, this gave a more conceptual feel because the rocket would soar and then burst right away, the proper sequence of a rocket exploding. The signers blended the handshape “1” while swirling up into “the sky” and then having it burst by ending in the “5” handshape. NAD. (2013). Watch NAD: John Maucere Signs National Anthem. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0Yi_0DOgHE SSK1558. (2007). National Anthem. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJgWT8NMPJs “One way to describe how the form of depicting verbs represents aspects of their meaning through blending” (Liddell 2003a, Valli et al, p.138). ASL users take advantage of conceptual blending by using the fingers, hands, arms body, and face as the real “objects” representing scenes (Valli et al, p.139). Valli, C., Lucas, C., Mulrooney, K., & Villanueva, M. (2011). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An Introduction (5th ed.). p.138, 142, 193. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Wanger, K. (2014). Super Bowl XLVIII - National Anthem with ASL. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snpsG7jmUGM